Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Foliar spray of TiO2 nanoparticles prevails over root application in reducing Cd accumulation and mitigating Cd-induced phytotoxicity in maize (Zea mays L.)

Lian, Jiapan, Zhao, Longfei, Wu, Jiani, Xiong, Hongxia, Bao, Yanyu, Zeb, Aurang, Tang, Jingchun, Liu, Weitao·2020·Chemosphere

Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) pollution is considered one of the global environmental issues due to its adverse effects on plant and human health. With the rapid development of nanotechnology and the practical application of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) in agriculture, the mechanisms underlying the interactions between NPs and heavy metal on their uptake, accumulation, and phytotoxicity in crops are still not fully understood. Therefore, the impact of TiO2 NPs (0, 100, 250 mg/L) and Cd (0, 50 μM) co-exposure on hydroponic maize (Zea mays L.) was determined under two exposure modes. Results showed that root co-exposure to TiO2 NPs and 100 mg/L Cd significantly enhanced Cd uptake and produced greater phytotoxicity in maize than foliar exposure to TiO2 NPs. Meanwhile, plant dry weight and chlorophyll content showed a reduction of 45.3% and 50.5%, respectively, when compared with single Cd treatment. In addition, the accumulation of Ti in shoots and roots increased by 1.61 and 4.29 times, respectively when root exposure to 250 mg/L TiO2 NPs. By contrast, foliar exposure of TiO2 NPs could markedly decrease shoot Cd contents from 15.2% to 17.8% and had a stronger influence on alleviating Cd-induced toxicity via increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) activities and upregulating several metabolic pathways, including galactose metabolism and citrate cycle, alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism, as well as glycine, serine and threonine metabolism. This study provides a new strategy for the application of TiO2 NPs in crop safety production in Cd contaminated soils.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124794

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Lian, J., Zhao, L., Wu, J., Xiong, H., Bao, Y., Zeb, A., Tang, J., & Liu, W.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
239
Pages
124794
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2971905460
Cited by
280
References
2
FWCI
8.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foliar spray of TiO2 nanoparticles prevails over root application in reducing Cd accumulation and mitigating Cd-induced phytotoxicity in maize (Zea mays L.). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124794
The paper
Lian, J., Zhao, L., Wu, J., Xiong, H., Bao, Y., Zeb, A., Tang, J., & Liu, W. (2020). Foliar spray of TiO2 nanoparticles prevails over root application in reducing Cd accumulation and mitigating Cd-induced phytotoxicity in maize (Zea mays L.). Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124794

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.