The DOI matches its Crossref record; 229 of the 229 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Copper bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and tolerance in plants: A comprehensive review
Abstract
Copper (Cu) is an essential element for humans and plants when present in lesser amount, while in excessive amounts it exerts detrimental effects. There subsists a narrow difference amid the indispensable, positive and detrimental concentration of Cu in living system, which substantially alters with Cu speciation, and form of living organisms. Consequently, it is vital to monitor its bioavailability, speciation, exposure levels and routes in the living organisms. The ingestion of Cu-laced food crops is the key source of this heavy metal toxicity in humans. Hence, it is necessary to appraise the biogeochemical behaviour of Cu in soil-plant system with esteem to their quantity and speciation. On the basis of existing research, this appraisal traces a probable connexion midst: Cu levels, sources, chemistry, speciation and bioavailability in the soil. Besides, the functions of protein transporters in soil-plant Cu transport, and the detrimental effect of Cu on morphological, physiological and nutrient uptake in plants has also been discussed in the current manuscript. Mechanisms related to detoxification strategies like antioxidative response and generation of glutathione and phytochelatins to combat Cu-induced toxicity in plants is discussed as well. We also delimits the Cu accretion in food crops and allied health perils from soils encompassing less or high Cu quantity. Finally, an overview of various techniques involved in the reclamation and restoration of Cu-contaminated soils has been provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants
(1995) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-473542-2.x5000-7 · Cited by 19,181
Trumbo (2001) · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(01)00078-5 · Cited by 4,852
Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review
Nagajyoti, P. C., Lee, K. D., & Sreekanth, T. V. M. (2010) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-010-0297-8 · Cited by 3,962
Wuana, R. A., & Okieimen, F. E. (2011) · ISRN Ecology · doi:10.5402/2011/402647 · Cited by 3,822
Lindsay, W. L. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,292
Baker, A. J. M., & Brooks, R. R. (1989) · Cited by 2,213
Khan, S., Cao, Q., Zheng, Y. M., Huang, Y. Z., & Zhu, Y. G. (2008) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.056 · Cited by 1,946
Heavy metals in food crops: health risks, fate, mechanisms, and management
Rai, P. K., Lee, S. S., Zhang, M., Tsang, Y. F., & Kim, K.-H. (2019) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.067 · Cited by 1,895
Graf, D. L. (1980) · Clays and Clay Minerals · doi:10.1346/ccmn.1980.0280411 · Cited by 1,829
Microbial diversity and soil functions
Nannipieri, P., Ascher, J., Ceccherini, M. T., Landi, L., Pietramellara, G., & Renella, G. (2017) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/ejss.4_12398 · Cited by 1,725
Cited by
Metal and metalloid toxicity in plants: an overview on molecular aspects
Angulo-Bejarano, P. I., Puente-Rivera, J., & Cruz-Ortega, R. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10040635 · Cited by 357
Pasricha, S., Mathur, V., Garg, A., Lenka, S., Verma, K., & Agarwal, S. (2021) · Environmental Challenges · doi:10.1016/j.envc.2021.100197 · Cited by 196
Abidli, A., Huang, Y., Ben Rejeb, Z., Zaoui, A., & Park, C. B. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133102 · Cited by 194
Chen, L., Beiyuan, J., Hu, W., Zhang, Z., Duan, C., Cui, Q., Zhu, X., He, H., Huang, X., & Fang, L. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133577 · Cited by 160
Are Grasses Really Useful for the Phytoremediation of Potentially Toxic Trace Elements? A Review
Rabêlo, F. H. S., Vangronsveld, J., Baker, A. J. M., van der Ent, A., & Alleoni, L. R. F. (2021) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.778275 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, V., Pandita, S., Singh Sidhu, G. P., Sharma, A., Khanna, K., Kaur, P., Bali, A. S., & Setia, R.
- Venue
- Chemosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 262
- Pages
- 127810
- ISSN
- 0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3046808342
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 229
- FWCI
- 13.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Copper bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and tolerance in plants: A comprehensive review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127810
- The paper
- Kumar, V., Pandita, S., Singh Sidhu, G. P., Sharma, A., Khanna, K., Kaur, P., Bali, A. S., & Setia, R. (2021). Copper bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and tolerance in plants: A comprehensive review. Chemosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127810
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.