Cited by 127Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Legacy and emerging per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in Australian biosolids

Moodie, Damien, Coggan, Timothy, Berry, Kathryn, Kolobaric, Adam, Fernandes, Milena, Lee, Elliot, Reichman, Suzie, Nugegoda, Dayanthi +1 more·2021·Chemosphere

Abstract

Biosolids samples were collected from 19 Australian WWTPs during 2018 that cover a range of catchment types (urban, rural, industrial waste discharges) and treatment technologies. Samples were analysed for 44 PFAS using isotope dilution and alkaline extraction coupled with quantification with LC-MS/MS. The Σ 44 PFAS mean concentration was 260 ng/g dry weight (dw) and ranged between 4.2 and 910 ng/g dw. The dominant compound class detected were the di-substituted phosphate esters (Σ 3 PAPs mean 140 ng/g dw; range ND - 730 ng/g dw) which contributed 45% of the total mean Σ 44 PFAS mass, followed by perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (Σ 11 PFCAs mean 39 ng/g dw; range 2.3-120 ng/g dw) contributing 17%, and the perfluoroalkyl sulfonates (Σ 8 PFSAs mean 28 ng/g dw; range 0.9-220 ng/g) which contributed 16%. Using the population data supplied by the participating WWTPs, the mean annual estimated biosolids-associated PFAS contribution is 6 mg per person per year and ranged between 0.6 mg and 15 mg. A similar population normalised concentration regardless of WWTP, region or capacity suggests that the domestic environment provides the baseline PFAS loading. Statistically significant higher Σ 44 PFAS and PFOS concentrations were observed at urban locations. A weak correlation was observed between annual mass of PFAS associated with each individual WWTP and their percentage industrial waste contribution. This may be important for elevated PFAS concentrations observed in WWTPs with higher industrial waste inputs and requires further research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.129143

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 127

Authors
Moodie, D., Coggan, T., Berry, K., Kolobaric, A., Fernandes, M., Lee, E., Reichman, S., Nugegoda, D., & Clarke, B. O.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Water Corporation of Western Australia (Australia) (AU)
Corresponding author
Clarke, Bradley O.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
270
Pages
129143
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3112922809
Cited by
127
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 8
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Water Research Australia
  • RMIT University
  • Agilent Technologies
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, biosolids, wastewater treatment plants, PFOS, phosphate esters, perfluorinated carboxylic acids, perfluoroalkyl sulfonates, industrial waste discharge, PFAS exposure
MeSH terms
Biosolids, Australia, Chromatography, Liquid, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review