Cited by 40Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsUrban Stormwater Management Solutions

Sources and Pathways of PFAS Occurrence in Water Sources: Relative Contribution of Land-Applied Biosolids in an Agricultural Dominated Watershed

Open access
Peter, Lynda Godwin, Lee, Linda S.·2025·Environmental Science & Technology

Abstract

This study evaluated PFAS occurrence in rural well water and surface water relative to land application of biosolids in a tile-drained agriculture-dominated watershed. Spatial data were used to identify potentially vulnerable rural wells based on their proximity to biosolid-permitted land and location with respect to groundwater flow. Water was collected from 103 private wells in Greater Tippecanoe County Indiana and 168 surface water locations within the Region of the Great Bend of the Wabash River watershed. Overall, results indicate that surface water (∑PFAS ≤ 169.4 ng/L) is more vulnerable to PFAS contamination than well water (∑PFAS ≤ 15.7 ng/L). Short-chain perfluoroalkyl acids made up 72% of the ∑PFAS in both water sources. Nonetheless, long-chain homologues were detected more frequently in surface water (94%) than well water (82%). Hierarchical cluster analysis identified biosolid-applied fields, WTTPs, and industrial discharges as PFAS sources in first-order streams with high ∑PFAS. Temporal trends revealed an inverse relationship between streamflow and concentrations in surface water sites impacted by point discharges and vice versa for diffuse sources, thereby providing complementary evidence of potential sources. The well water data set did not show a distinct spatial trend between ∑PFAS and distance from biosolid application or well characteristics.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study evaluated PFAS in 103 private wells and 168 surface-water sites in an agriculture-dominated Indiana watershed to assess whether land-applied biosolids contribute to water contamination. Surface water was more vulnerable than well water, with the highest surface-water PFAS site hydrologically connected to an active biosolid-applied field, while well-water PFAS showed no clear spatial relationship to biosolid application or well characteristics.

Key findings

  • Surface water had higher PFAS than well water: ∑PFAS ≤169.4 ng/L in surface water versus ≤15.7 ng/L in well water (abstract; Results reports a maximum surface-water total of 169.5 ng/L at site N60). At least one PFAS was detected above the LOD in 90% of surface-water and 84% of well-water samples, and 14 of 51 targeted PFASs were above the LOQ in one or more samples.
  • Short-chain perfluoroalkyl acids made up 72% of ∑PFAS in both water sources, but long-chain homologues were detected more frequently in surface water (94%) than well water (82%). PFBS had the highest maximum concentration (87 ng/L), followed by PFPeA (24 ng/L) and PFBA (17 ng/L), all in surface water.
  • Hierarchical cluster analysis identified biosolid-applied fields, WWTPs, and industrial discharges as PFAS sources in first-order streams with high ∑PFAS. Three stream sites draining biosolid-receiving fields (N23, N60, N62) had total PFAS concentrations of 93.6, 169.5, and 79.2 ng/L, respectively; N60 receives tile drainage from an active biosolid-applied field with yearly application for over 20 years.
  • Temporal trends showed an inverse relationship between streamflow and concentrations at surface-water sites impacted by point discharges, and the opposite for diffuse sources. Well-water data showed no distinct spatial trend between ∑PFAS and distance from biosolid application or well characteristics.

Methods

  • The study area was the Region of the Great Bend of the Wabash River watershed, primarily Tippecanoe County, Indiana. Samples included 103 private wells in Greater Tippecanoe County and 168 surface-water locations; surface water was grab-sampled, and private well owners collected untreated well water via a citizen-science network.
  • Unfiltered water samples were processed by solid-phase extraction and analyzed by UPLC coupled to a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer. QA/QC included laboratory blanks, matrix spikes, surrogate standards, LOD/LOQ determination, and exclusion of analytes present in blanks above LOQs.
  • Spatial and statistical analyses included Moran’s I spatial autocorrelation, hierarchical cluster analysis, bivariate correlation after maximum-likelihood substitution of censored data, and ArcGIS-based distance calculations using potentiometric surface maps and IDEM records.

Limitations

  • Stated: the well-water dataset did not show a distinct spatial trend between ∑PFAS and distance from biosolid application or well characteristics; source apportionment remained ambiguous at sites impacted by multiple NPDES discharges; additional data are needed for robust interpretation of temporal trends; and the study area does not adequately capture the combination of industrially impacted biosolids, coarse-textured soils, nonconfining aquifer material, and high water table.
  • Stated: more studies across diverse agricultural landscapes are needed to characterize causative factors driving PFAS transport to groundwater, and future work could sample individual points of release to improve source apportionment.
  • Evident from the text: streamflow was not measured directly; flow conditions were inferred from rainfall data and stream gauges. The paper also reports different targeted PFAS counts in different places (abstract says 48; Results says 51), which is an evident inconsistency in the text.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.est.4c09490

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 44 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Long-chain homologues were detected more frequently in surface water (94%) than in well water (82%).

    “Nonetheless, long-chain homologues were detected more frequently in surface water (94%) than well water (82%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Short-chain perfluoroalkyl acids made up 72% of the ∑PFAS in both surface water and well water.

    “Short-chain perfluoroalkyl acids made up 72% of the ∑PFAS in both water sources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Hierarchical cluster analysis identified biosolid-applied fields, wastewater treatment plants, and industrial discharges as PFAS sources in first-order streams with high ∑PFAS.

    “Hierarchical cluster analysis identified biosolid-applied fields, WTTPs, and industrial discharges as PFAS sources in first-order streams with high ∑PFAS.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The well water data set did not show a distinct spatial trend between ∑PFAS and distance from biosolid application or well characteristics.

    “The well water data set did not show a distinct spatial trend between ∑PFAS and distance from biosolid application or well characteristics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Median total PFAS concentrations in surface water (2.6 ng/L) and well water (1.0 ng/L) are comparable.

    “Nevertheless, in our study, median concentrations in surface water (2.6 ng/L) and well water (1.0 ng/L) are comparable, indicating similarity in concentrations for both water sources except for the hotspot surface water locations that are disproportionately impacted directly by PFAS discharges.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 50
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Surface water is more vulnerable to PFAS contamination than well water, with maximum total PFAS concentrations of 169.5 ng/L in surface water and 15.7 ng/L in well water, and over 90% of wells having total concentrations below 5 ng/L.

    “Overall, results indicate that surface water (∑PFAS ≤ 169.4 ng/L) is more vulnerable to PFAS contamination than well water (∑PFAS ≤ 15.7 ng/L).”
    • Also stated in: § PFAS in Well and Surface Waters · plain
      “The maximum total PFAS concentration in surface water (169.5 ng/L) was higher than well water (15.7 ng/L) with over 90% of the wells having total concentrations <5 ng/L (Figure 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At least one PFAS was detected above the LOD in 90% of surface water samples and 84% of well water samples, and none of the samples had more than 10 targeted PFASs of quantifiable concentration.

    “At least one PFAS was detected above the LOD in 90 and 84% of the surface water and well water samples, respectively; however, none of the samples had more than 10 targeted PFASs of quantifiable concentration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Sixty-six percent of the wells sampled were within 2 km of an application site, with the nearest well located 0.05 km from a biosolid-receiving field.

    “Sixty-six percent of the wells sampled were within 2 km of an application site with the nearest well located 0.05 km from a biosolid-receiving field.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The distribution of PFAAs was similar between water sources, with PFCAs making up 67% of surface water and 63% of well water, and PFSAs comprising 29% of surface water and 27% of well water.

    “The distribution of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAAs) was similar between water sources, with perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFCAs) making up 67 and 63% and perfluorosulfonic acids (PFSAs) comprising 29 and 27% in surface water and well water, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Temporal trends revealed an inverse relationship between streamflow and PFAS concentrations at surface water sites impacted by point discharges, and the opposite relationship at sites impacted by diffuse sources.

    “Temporal trends revealed an inverse relationship between streamflow and concentrations in surface water sites impacted by point discharges and vice versa for diffuse sources, thereby providing complementary evidence of potential sources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among all PFASs across all samples, PFBS had the highest maximum concentration of 87 ng/L, followed by PFPeA at 24 ng/L and PFBA at 17 ng/L, all in surface water samples.

    “Among all the PFASs across all samples, PFBS had the highest maximum concentration of 87 ng/L followed by 24 ng/L for PFPeA and 17 ng/L for PFBA, all of which were in surface water samples.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    PFOA concentrations at N23, N60, and N62 were 1.8, 10.8, and 4.0 ng/L, and PFOS concentrations were 0.7, 3.7, and 1.5 ng/L, respectively.

    “PFOA concentrations were 1.8, 10.8, and 4.0 ng/L, and PFOS concentrations were 0.7, 3.7, and 1.5 ng/L.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Site N60 is 0.05 km from the source, while N23 and N62 are 0.7 and 1.9 km, respectively.

    “Site N60 is 0.05 km from the source, while N23 and N62 are 0.7 and 1.9 km, respectively; therefore, the proximity to the source might explain the differences in concentrations between these three sites.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    PFBS, PFHxS, and PFOS were the major PFSAs in all water samples, with surface water having higher proportions of PFOS (68%) compared to well water (48%).

    “PFBS, PFHxS, and PFOS were the major PFSAs in all water samples with surface water having higher proportions of PFOS (68%) compared to well water (48%).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    FBSA and EtFOSAA were detected in 11% and 3%, respectively, of surface water sampling locations.

    “FBSA and EtFOSAA, two electrochemically derived precursors to PFSAs, were detected in 11 and 3%, respectively, of surface water sampling locations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For surface water in this study, the highest concentration of PFOA was 6.8 ng/L and of PFOS was 4.6 ng/L.

    “For surface water in this study, the highest concentration of PFOA and PFOS measured was 6.8 and 4.6 ng/L, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Hierarchical cluster analysis identified PFAS co-occurrence trends and spatial clustering of sites.

    “Hierarchical cluster analysis identified PFAS co-occurrence trends and spatial clustering of sites (Figure 4).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At N23, N60, and N62, PFOS levels were all below the proposed EPA drinking water standards, and PFOA exceeded the limit in only one location.

    “While these are relatively high concentrations compared to the rest of the watershed, PFOS levels are all below the proposed EPA drinking water standards, and PFOA exceeds the limit in only one location.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Sites associated with AFFF use for fire training activities (N11 and N12) had higher concentrations in spring than summer, possibly due to surface runoff.

    “Sites associated with AFFF use for fire training activities (N11 and N12) also had higher concentrations in the spring than in the summer possibly due to surface runoff.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    PFAS concentrations were highest in summer for 46% of sites sampled temporally, with all sites but one recording approximately 2 times more total concentrations in summer compared to spring.

    “PFAS concentrations were highest in the summer for 46% of sites sampled temporally, with all sites but one recording ∼2× more total concentrations in the summer compared to the spring (Figure 5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Average flow in summer and spring was 2300 and 10000 ft3/s, respectively.

    “Average flow in the summer and spring was 2300 and 10000 f3/s, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Sites associated with point discharges had peak concentrations in summer when low streamflow is expected, while locations impacted by nonpoint source release recorded higher concentrations in spring.

    “Sites associated with point discharges had peak concentrations in the summer when low streamflow is expected, while locations impacted by nonsource point release recorded higher concentrations in the spring.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    For the remaining sites, there were no clear temporal trends, possibly due to increased downstream dilution for sites S78, S81, and S90 or sustained concentrations from year-round equitable flow conditions for sites along the river (R01, R02, R05, and R06).

    “For the remaining sites, there were no clear temporal trends possibly due to increased downstream dilution for sites S78, S81, and S90 or sustained concentrations from year-round equitable flow conditions for sites along the river (R01, R02, R05, and R06).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    PFBS and other PFAAs were detected across all sites due to their ubiquitous use, while concentrations of less-documented FBSA were elevated downstream from a computer hardware manufacturer that is a previously reported novel source.

    “PFBS and other PFAAs were detected across all sites due to their ubiquitous use, while concentrations of the less-documented FBSA were elevated downstream from a computer hardware manufacturer that is a previously reported novel source.47”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The well in this study with the highest total PFAS concentration is approximately 0.9 km from an upstream biosolid-applied field, with a total well depth of 43 m and 1.5 m static water level.

    “For example, the well in our study with the highest total PFAS concentration is ∼0.9 km from an upstream biosolid-applied field, with a total well depth of 43 m and 1.5 m static water level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    PFAS concentrations in wells were relatively low and did not exceed enforceable EPA MCLs.

    “Although PFAS concentrations in wells were relatively low and did not exceed the enforceable EPA MCLs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Observed concentrations in wells near impacted surface water sites associated with known PFAS sources were comparable to other well water samples, indicating that groundwater in this area is generally protected from contamination.

    “Also, observed concentrations in wells near impacted surface water sites associated with known PFAS sources were comparable to other well water samples, indicating that groundwater in this area is generally protected from contamination.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    The field has frequently received biosolids over the past 20 years at a loading rate between 1.0 and 4.8 dry tons/acre, except for an instance where biosolids were applied at approximately 30 dry tons/acre.

    “The field has frequently received biosolids over the past 20 years at a loading rate between 1.0 and 4.8 dry tons/acre except for an instance where biosolids were applied at ∼30 dry tons/acre.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    PFASs released from source zones during weathering and drainage events are delivered either via suspended solids in runoffs to surface waters or via leaching to groundwater.

    “PFASs released from source zones during weathering and drainage events are delivered either via suspended solids in runoffs to surface waters or via leaching to groundwater.11−13”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [13] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Johnson et al. reviewed 96 studies for PFAS distribution in groundwater, of which AFFF-impacted sites made up 32% of known sources, 18% were in locations impacted by PFAS manufacturing and industrial activities, and only 3% were for biosolid application sites.

    “For example, Johnson et al.28 reviewed 96 studies for PFAS distribution in groundwater of which AFFF-impacted sites made up 32% of known sources, 18% in locations impacted by PFAS manufacturing and industrial activities, and only 3% for biosolid application sites.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The relative contribution of biosolids to PFAS in water sources is poorly understood, partly due to knowledge gaps in tracing and connecting diffuse sources of PFAS to contamination of water sources.

    “While several studies have evaluated the environmental occurrence of PFAS, the relative contribution of biosolids to PFAS in water sources is poorly understood, partly due to knowledge gaps in tracing and connecting diffuse sources of PFAS to contamination of water sources.24”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Gottschall et al. detected PFOS and PFOA with maximum concentrations of 17 and 12 ng/L, respectively, in tile drains installed in a biosolid-applied field.

    “Gottschall et al.18 detected PFOS and PFOA with maximum concentrations of 17 and 12 ng/L, respectively, in tile drains installed in a biosolid-applied field.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    PFASs are consistently detected in wastewater treatment influents, effluents, and residuals including biosolids, which present pathways for PFAS redistribution in aquatic environments.

    “The ubiquitous use of PFASs is reflected by their consistent detection in wastewater treatment influents, effluents, and residuals including biosolids,7−9 all of which present pathways for PFAS redistribution in aquatic environments.10”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [7] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [10] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Other non-PFAS tile-drained field studies have shown that agrochemicals including pesticides and inorganic fertilizers bypass the soil network and move horizontally through tile drainage into receiving water bodies.

    “Other non-PFAS tile-drained field studies have shown that instead of vertical migration, agrochemicals including pesticides and inorganic fertilizers bypass the soil network and move horizontally through the tile drainage into receiving water bodies.19−22”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [19] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [20] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The higher FBSA than PFOS at sites S31 and N08 is possibly due to changes in the industrial use of long-chain PFASs over the past decade.

    “possibly due to changes in the industrial use of long-chain PFASs over the past decade.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Site N08 is located approximately 2 km downstream of a computer chip manufacturing company.

    “Site N08 is located ∼2 km downstream of a computer chip manufacturing company.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Dilution might explain the clustering pattern along the Wabash River in which sites with elevated PFOS concentrations (R01 and R02) located between three WWTP outfalls were separated from diluted downstream river sites (R03, R04, R05, and R06).

    “Similarly, dilution might explain the clustering pattern along the Wabash River in which sites with elevated PFOS concentrations (R01 and R02) located between three WWTP outfalls were separated from diluted downstream river sites (R03, R04, R05, and R06).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Site N60 is likely impacted by short-chain PFAAs that leached into tile drains following land application of biosolids in addition to surface runoff of long-chain PFAS sorbed to the soil.

    “The site is likely impacted by short-chain PFAAs that leached into tile drains following land application of biosolids in addition to surface runoff of long-chain PFAS sorbed to the soil.12”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    AFFF use is another potential source at cluster 4 sites N11 and N12, which are located within approximately 0.3 km from a small airport with a nearby undisclosed fire training site.

    “Another potential source is the use of AFFF as observed in cluster 4 sites (N11 and N12) that are located within ∼0.3 km from a small airport with a nearby undisclosed fire training site.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Streamflow was not measured; changes in flow conditions were inferred from rainfall data and stream gauges placed in the Wabash River within the watershed.

    “Although streamflow was not measured, changes in flow conditions were inferred from rainfall data and stream gauges placed in the Wabash River within the watershed (Figure S4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Sites R03 and R04 are flanked by biosolid-receiving fields and thereby impacted by both nonpoint and upstream point sources.

    “Unlike other sampling locations on the river, both sites are flanked by biosolid-receiving fields and thereby impacted by both nonpoint and upstream point sources.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biosolids applied to agricultural fields were linked to PFAS contamination in the upper Moehne River in Heidelberg, Germany, with a maximum total concentration of 4,348 ng/L (seven PFASs with 83% being PFOA).

    “In another study, biosolids applied to agricultural fields were linked to PFAS contamination in the upper Moehne River in Heidelberg, Germany, with a maximum total concentration of 4,348 ng/L (seven PFASs with 83% being PFOA).41”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Contaminated surface water locations could potentially impact downstream public water supplies or provide a pathway for exposure via fish consumption.

    “However, contaminated locations could potentially impact downstream public water supplies or provide a pathway for exposure via fish consumption.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Lindstrom et al. reported total concentrations of up to 30,000 ng/L in surface water associated with land application of industrial-impacted biosolids.

    “Lindstrom et al.40 reported total concentrations of up to 30,000 ng/L in surface water associated with land application of industrial-impacted biosolids.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In spring, high streamflow can dilute PFAS concentrations in point discharges or increase concentrations via surface runoff in locations impacted by nonpoint sources.

    “In the spring, high streamflow can dilute PFAS concentrations in point discharges or increase concentrations via surface runoff in locations impacted by nonpoint sources.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sorption to river sediment and bioaccumulation in biota are other potential attenuation pathways along the river reach.

    “Sorption to river sediment and bioaccumulation in biota are other potential attenuation pathways along the river reach.13”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    In the early 2000s, biosolids were applied at site N60 at approximately 30 dry tons/acre, which is more than 10 times the regular application rate.

    “Additionally, in the early 2000s, biosolids were applied at ∼30 dry tons/acre, which is >10× the regular application rate.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Summer sampling followed periods of little to no precipitation, resulting in insufficient flow to dilute point discharges and thereby higher PFAS concentrations.

    “Summer sampling followed periods of little to no precipitation resulting in insufficient flow to dilute point discharges and thereby resulted in higher PFAS concentrations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    FBSA was reported as a short-chain substitute for PFOS in semiconductor production.

    “In another study, FBSA was reported as a short-chain substitute for PFOS in semiconductor production.48”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    FBSA is a metabolite of N-methyl-perfluorobutanesulfonyl [C4F9SO2N(CH3)], a short-chain fluorinated surfactant used in Scotchgard products as an alternative to N-ethyl-perfluorooctanesulfonyl (a PFOS precursor).

    “Chu and Letcher47 identified FBSA as a metabolite of N-methyl-perfluorobutanesulfonyl [C4F9SO2N(CH3)], which is a short-chain fluorinated surfactant used in Scotchgard products as an alternative to N-ethyl-perfluorooctaneslfonyl (C8F17SO2N(C2H5), a PFOS precursor).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chu and Letcher47

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The high p value and z score of 0.62 signify absence of geospatial clustering for PFAS concentrations in wells, implying a random distribution of concentrations relative to landscape factors.

    “The high p value and z score of 0.62 clearly signify the absence of geospatial clustering for PFAS concentrations in wells, thereby implying a random distribution of concentrations relative to landscape factors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Sites S21 and S22 are likely impacted not by nonpoint sources but by upstream ephemeral headwaters that receive point discharges but only have flowing water in spring, resulting in elevated PFAS levels during spring sampling.

    “Both sites are likely impacted not by nonpoint sources but rather by upstream ephemeral headwaters that receive point discharges but only have flowing water in the spring, hence resulting in elevated PFAS levels during spring sampling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The glacial aquifer system protects groundwater from contamination in the study area, and subsurface drainage systems obscure transport pathways and source attribution, highlighting the importance of incorporating prevailing hydrogeological conditions into PFAS forensic studies.

    “Overall, the glacial aquifer system protects groundwater from contamination in the study area, and subsurface drainage systems obscure transport pathways and source attribution, which highlight the importance of incorporating prevailing hydrogeological conditions into PFAS forensic studies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This particular location is unlikely to be impacted by industrial sources due to absence of NPDES discharges and likely represents the worst case scenario of PFAS contamination from biosolid applications in the study area.

    “This particular location is unlikely to be impacted by industrial sources due to the absence of NPDES discharges and likely represents the worst case scenario of PFAS contamination from biosolid applications in the study area.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such transport models can inform risk assessment at a large scale but sometimes have limitations at capturing location-specific nuances.

    “Such transport models can inform risk assessment at a large scale; however, they sometimes have limitations at capturing location-specific nuances.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The results provide evidence of PFAS transport down the soil profile, but the impact from land application of biosolids and other sources is confounded by multiple interdependent transport factors.

    “our results provide evidence of PFAS transport down the soil profile, but the impact from land application of biosolids and other sources is confounded by multiple interdependent transport factors.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Artificial drainage systems facilitate horizontal transport of porewater from soils to agricultural ditches and surface water bodies and thereby are critical sources of PFASs in the study area.

    “These artificial drainage systems facilitate the horizontal transport of porewater from soils to agricultural ditches and surface water bodies and thereby are critical sources of PFASs in the study area.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Preferential flow through tile drains can increase PFAS export to ditch networks during storm events, resulting in a direct relationship between streamflow and concentrations.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This alteration in drainage might explain why distance from upstream sources as a factor was not apparent in well water.

    “This alteration in drainage might explain why the distance from upstream sources as a factor was not apparent in well water.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Prevalence of subsurface drainage in the study mediates transport of chemicals to groundwater; rather than vertical transport, soil porewater is redirected to ditches and other waterbodies.

    “In addition to geological factors, the prevalence of subsurface drainage in the study mediates transport of chemicals to groundwater; rather than vertical transport, soil porewater is redirected to ditches and other waterbodies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Aquifer characteristics appear more critical than distance to upstream location for the highest-PFAS well, because the well was completed in parts of the Till Veneer aquifer system where protective clay layers are thin or absent.

    “Although the distance to the upstream location might play a role in this case, aquifer characteristics appear to be more critical considering that the well was completed in parts of the Till Veneer aquifer system where protective clay layers are thin or absent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    In such scenarios, concentrations are often highest immediately after source application, which aligns with the spring timeline for biosolid application in the watershed.

    “In such scenarios, concentrations are often highest immediately after source application, which aligns with the spring timeline for biosolid application in the watershed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: In scenarios of intense storm events and biosolid application, concentrations are often highest immediately after source application.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Statistical models that identify drivers of PFAS concentrations in groundwater have been reported in statewide or regional studies.

    “Statistical models that identify drivers of PFAS concentrations in groundwater have been reported in statewide or regional studies.55−57”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [55] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [56] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [57] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The current study area does not adequately capture a combination of factors that could increase contamination risk; therefore, more studies across diverse agricultural landscapes within the region are needed to sufficiently characterize causative factors driving PFAS transport to groundwater.

    “Our current study area does not adequately capture a combination of these factors; therefore, more studies across diverse agricultural landscapes within the region are needed to sufficiently characterize causative factors driving PFAS transport to groundwater.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Differences in PFAS concentrations in this study cannot be explained by a generalized model and transport from potential sources to groundwater is location specific.

    “This suggests that differences in PFAS concentrations in this study cannot be explained by a generalized model and that transport from potential sources to groundwater is location specific.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Gaining streams are prevalent in the watershed; therefore, PFAS-impaired surface water is unlikely to impact groundwater.

    “Moreover, gaining streams are prevalent in the watershed; therefore, PFAS-impaired surface water is unlikely to impact groundwater.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Gaining streams are prevalent in the watershed.
60 of 60
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Surface water in this watershed does not serve as a drinking water source.

    “While these values are above EPA’s MCLs, surface water in this watershed does not serve as a drinking water source.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Indiana Department of Environmental Management spatial data records accurately represent biosolid application permits and historical application.

    “According to Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) spatial data records, 39,055 acres have permits for biosolid application in the watershed, of which only 9430 acres have received biosolids in the past 20 years (Figure S1).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Potentiometric surface maps accurately represent groundwater flow paths for calculating well distance from land application sites.

    “Well distance from the closest upstream land application site was calculated along the path of groundwater flow paths from lines of potentiometric surface maps using ArcGIS.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Preferential flow through tile drains can increase PFAS export to ditch networks during storm events, resulting in a direct relationship between streamflow and concentrations.

    “Preferential flow through tile drains can also increase PFAS export to ditch networks during storm events, resulting in a direct relationship between streamflow and concentrations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In scenarios of intense storm events and biosolid application, concentrations are often highest immediately after source application.

    “In such scenarios, concentrations are often highest immediately after source application, which aligns with the spring timeline for biosolid application in the watershed.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Gaining streams are prevalent in the watershed.

    “Moreover, gaining streams are prevalent in the watershed; therefore, PFAS-impaired surface water is unlikely to impact groundwater.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The potential impact of land application of biosolids on water sources is unclear due to limited studies.

    “The potential impact of other sources such as land application of biosolids on water sources is unclear due to limited studies.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reported maximum surface-water PFOA is below a measured value

    Major

    The results call 6.8 ng/L the highest surface-water PFOA concentration, but later report 10.8 ng/L at one surface-water location.

  • Two different maximum surface-water PFAS totals

    Minor

    The abstract gives the maximum total surface-water concentration as 169.4 ng/L, but the results give 169.5 ng/L at the same reported precision.

  • Number of targeted PFAS differs between sections

    Minor

    The introduction says 48 PFASs were targeted, while the results say 51 were targeted.

  • Surface-water location categories total 164, not 168

    Minor

    The four listed categories sum to 164 locations, leaving four of the stated 168 locations unaccounted for.

    Reported 168 · recomputed 164

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156602 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peter, L. G., & Lee, L. S.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Linda S.
Venue
Environmental Science & Technology
Published
2025-01-08
Volume
59
Issue
2
Pages
1344-1353
ISSN
  • 0013-936X (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5851
OpenAlex
W4406162513
Cited by
40
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 15
FWCI
11.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture (1006516)
  • Hampton Roads Sanitation District
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (G20B113019085, R84008201)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Keywords
PFAS, perfluoroalkyl acids, biosolids land application, surface water contamination, groundwater contamination, tile drainage, agricultural watersheds, point source discharges, river discharge, short-chain PFAS, long-chain PFAS, industrial discharge, source apportionment
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Indiana, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Rivers, Groundwater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review