Cited by 162Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Mechanistic Interaction of Ciprofloxacin on Zeolite Modified Seaweed (Sargassum Crassifolium) Derived Biochar: Kinetics, Isotherm and Thermodynamics

Atugoda, Thilakshani, Gunawardane, Chaminda, Ahmad, Mahtab, Vithanage, Meththika·2021·Chemosphere

Abstract

Modification of biochar for efficient removal of antibiotics from water could be a valuable approach in the environmental applications. In this study, a brown seaweed (Sargassum crassifolium) was pyrolyzed at 500 °C and the obtained biochar (SWBC) was modified with zeolite through the slurry method maintaining the ratio at 1:5 (zeolite: biochar) (SWBC-Z). Batch adsorption experiments were conducted to evaluate the adsorption tendency of SWBC and SWBC-Z for the removal of ciprofloxacin (CPX) from water via pH edge, kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamic experiments. The highest adsorption was in the pH range of 6.5-8, supported by the electrostatic attractions and hydrogen bonding with zwitterionic CPX. Experimental kinetics data was well-fitted to the pseudo-second-order and Elovich models (R 2 of 0.992 and 0.976, respectively), while the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models best described the isotherm data (R 2 of 0.954 and 0.976, respectively). The maximum adsorption capacity of 93.65 mg g-1 was recorded for the SWBC-Z. The models predicted chemisorption and physisorption interactions on the heterogenous biochar surface. Well-defined peaks of silanol groups in the FTIR spectrum of SWBC-Z and its electron microscopy confirmed the incorporation of zeolite minerals. Post adsorption FTIR analysis elucidated the changes in the surface functional groups of the SWBC-Z. Thermodynamic data revealed spontaneous and exothermic reaction between CPX and both the biochars. It was concluded that modification of pristine biochar with zeolite imparted greater surface area and additional active sites, which subsequently enhanced the overall CPX adsorption by the SWBC-Z.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130676

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 83 · Cited by 162

Authors
Atugoda, T., Gunawardane, C., Ahmad, M., & Vithanage, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Sri Jayewardenepura (LK)
  • Quaid-i-Azam University (PK)
Corresponding author
Vithanage, Meththika
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
281
Pages
130676
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159744640
Cited by
162
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 7
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
International Development Research Centre
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
ciprofloxacin, antibiotic removal, biochar, Sargassum crassifolium, adsorption, adsorption kinetics, adsorption isotherms, adsorption thermodynamics, pyrolysis, slurry method, silanol groups, water treatment
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Charcoal, Ciprofloxacin, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Kinetics, Seaweed, Thermodynamics, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Zeolites, Sargassum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review