Cited by 38Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementBiofuel production and bioconversion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conversion of biomass blends (walnut shell and pearl millet) for the production of solid biofuel via torrefaction under different conditions

Abstract

The torrefaction of lignocellulose biomass was conducted to produce biochar with properties compatible with coal. Two lignocellulose biomasses, pearl millet (PM) and walnut shell (WS), were torrefied at different process temperatures (230-300 °C), residence times (30-90 min), and different compositional biomass blends to improve the characteristics of the biochar product. The resulting biochar product exhibited favorable changes in their properties. The pure biomasses and their blends obtained a high biochar yield (41-91%). The gross calorific value (GCV) ranged from 22 to 27 MJ/kg, showing an increase of 22-59% compared to the raw biomass. The torrefaction temperature had the most notable effect on the biochar quantity and quality. The biochar samples obtained from the torrefaction of different blends showed a higher GCV and other physicochemical characteristics than the pure biomasses. Scanning electron microscopy showed that these products might also be used for other applications.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133894

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Abbasi, 2021, Is coal power generation a sustainable solution for energy needs of Pakistan: a Delphi-SWOT paradigm?, Int. J. Energy Econ. Pol., 11
  2. Açıkalın, 2011, Thermogravimetric analysis of walnut shell as pyrolysis feedstock, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 105, 145, 10.1007/s10973-010-1267-x · DOI
  3. Ahmad, 2016, Potential use of natural rubber to produce liquid fuels using hydrous pyrolysis – a review, RSC Adv., 6, 68906, 10.1039/C6RA09085K · DOI
  4. Ahmad, 2018, Liquefaction of natural rubber to liquid fuels via hydrous pyrolysis, Fuel, 218, 227, 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.12.117 · DOI
  5. Anukam, 2015, An investigation into the impact of reaction temperature on various parameters during torrefaction of sugarcane bagasse relevant to gasification, J. Chem., 2015, 1, 10.1155/2015/235163 · DOI
  6. Barbanera, 2020, Effect of the temperature on the spent coffee grounds torrefaction process in a continuous pilot-scale reactor, Fuel, 262, 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116493 · DOI
  7. Cao, 2014, A new absorbent by modifying walnut shell for the removal of anionic dye: kinetic and thermodynamic studies, Bioresour. Technol., 163, 199, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.046 · DOI
  8. Chen, 2020, Upgrading rice husk via oxidative torrefaction: characterization of solid, liquid, gaseous products and a comparison with non-oxidative torrefaction, Fuel, 275, 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117936 · DOI
  9. Chen, 2015, A state-of-the-art review of biomass torrefaction, densification and applications, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 44, 847, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.039 · DOI
  10. Eseltine, 2013, Torrefaction of woody biomass (Juniper and Mesquite) using inert and non-inert gases, Fuel, 113, 379, 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.04.085 · DOI
  11. Finkelman, 2021, The future environmental and health impacts of coal, Energy Geosci., 2, 99, 10.1016/j.engeos.2020.11.001 · DOI
  12. Gupta, 2019, Slow pyrolysis of chemically treated walnut shell for valuable products: effect of process parameters and in-depth product analysis, Energy, 181, 665, 10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.214 · DOI
  13. Hamzenejad Taghlidabad, 2018, Heavy metals immobilization in contaminated soil by grape-pruning-residue biochar, Arch. Agron Soil Sci., 64, 1041, 10.1080/03650340.2017.1407872 · DOI
  14. Han, 2015, Oxygen migration in torrefaction of Eupatorium adenophorum Spreng. and its improvement on fuel properties, Energy Fuel., 29, 7275, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01318 · DOI
  15. Ibrahim, 2013, Physicochemical characterisation of torrefied biomass, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 103, 21, 10.1016/j.jaap.2012.10.004 · DOI
  16. Khan, 2021, Love for the climate in Sino–Pakistan economic romance: a perspective of environmental laws, Clean Technol. Environ. Policy, 23, 387, 10.1007/s10098-020-01938-4 · DOI
  17. Larsson, 2013, Effects of moisture content, torrefaction temperature, and die temperature in pilot scale pelletizing of torrefied Norway spruce, Appl. Energy, 102, 827, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.08.046 · DOI
  18. Lim, 2014, An alternative path for the preparation of triacetylcellulose from unrefined biomass, Adv. Chem. Eng. Sci., 5, 33, 10.4236/aces.2015.51004 · DOI
  19. Mahmoud, 2021, Superiority of modified graphene oxide for enhancing the growth, yield, and antioxidant potential of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) under salt stress, Plant Stress, 2, 10.1016/j.stress.2021.100025 · DOI
  20. Mirza, 2019, Impact of China-Pakistan economic corridor on Pakistan's future energy consumption and energy saving potential: evidence from sectoral time series analysis, Energy Strat. Rev., 25, 34, 10.1016/j.esr.2019.04.015 · DOI
  21. Nunes, 2014, A review on torrefied biomass pellets as a sustainable alternative to coal in power generation, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 40, 153, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.181 · DOI
  22. Peng, 2013, Torrefaction and densification of different species of softwood residues, Fuel, 111, 411, 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.04.048 · DOI
  23. Prins, 2006, Torrefaction of wood: Part 2. Analysis of products, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol., 77, 35, 10.1016/j.jaap.2006.01.001 · DOI
  24. Rago, 2020, Torrefaction of biomass and plastic from municipal solid waste streams and their blends: evaluation of interactive effects, Fuel, 277, 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118089 · DOI
  25. Rashid, 2020, Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from gas, oil, and coal power plants in Pakistan by carbon capture and storage (CCS): a Review, Chem. Eng. Technol., 43, 2140, 10.1002/ceat.201900297 · DOI
  26. Raza, 2020, Analysis of coal-related energy consumption in Pakistan: an alternative energy resource to fuel economic development, Environ. Dev. Sustain., 22, 6149, 10.1007/s10668-019-00468-4 · DOI
  27. Repellin, 2010, Energy requirement for fine grinding of torrefied wood, Biomass Bioenergy, 34, 923, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.039 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Rodrigues, 2018, Torrefaction of woody biomasses from poplar SRC and Portuguese roundwood: properties of torrefied products, Biomass Bioenergy, 108, 55, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.11.005 · DOI
  29. Saeed, 2015, Impact of torrefaction technique on the moisture contents, bulk density and calorific value of briquetted biomass, Pol. J. Chem. Technol., 17, 10.1515/pjct-2015-0024 · DOI
  30. Sami, 2001, Co-firing of coal and biomass fuel blends, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 27, 171, 10.1016/S0360-1285(00)00020-4 · DOI
  31. Shankar Tumuluru, 2011, A review on biomass torrefaction process and product properties for energy applications, Ind. Biotechnol., 7, 384, 10.1089/ind.2011.7.384 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Singh, 2020, Torrefaction of woody biomass (Acacia nilotica): investigation of fuel and flow properties to study its suitability as a good quality solid fuel, Renew. Energy, 153, 711, 10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.037 · DOI
  33. Sohoo, 2021, Biochemical methane potential assessment of municipal solid waste generated in Asian cities: a case study of Karachi, Pakistan, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 135, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110175 · DOI
  34. Sukiran, 2021, A comprehensive study on torrefaction of empty fruit bunches: characterization of solid, liquid and gas products, Energy, 230, 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120877 · DOI
  35. Tran, 2016, Effect of pyrolysis temperatures and times on the adsorption of cadmium onto orange peel derived biochar, Waste Manag. Res., 34, 129, 10.1177/0734242X15615698 · DOI
  36. Tumuluru, 2016, Effect of deep drying and torrefaction temperature on proximate, ultimate composition, and heating value of 2-mm Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) grind, Bioengineering (Basel), 3, 16, 10.3390/bioengineering3020016 · DOI
  37. Ullah, 2017, Recognizing production options for pearl millet in Pakistan under changing climate scenarios, J. Integr. Agric., 16, 762, 10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61450-8 · DOI
  38. Ullah, 2015, Assessing the lignocellulosic biomass resources potential in developing countries: a critical review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 51, 682, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.044 · DOI
  39. Vamvuka, 2020, The impact of a combined pre-treatment on the combustion performance of various biomass wastes and their blends with lignite, Thermochim. Acta, 688, 10.1016/j.tca.2020.178599 · DOI
  40. Varma, 2017, Pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse in semi batch reactor: effects of process parameters on product yields and characterization of products, Ind. Crop. Prod., 95, 704, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.11.039 · DOI
  41. Wang, 2017, Impact of torrefaction on woody biomass properties, Energy Proc., 105, 1149, 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.486 · DOI
  42. Witczak, 2011, Pre-treatment of biomass by torrefaction-preliminary studies, Drewno. Prace Naukowe. Doniesienia. Komunikaty, 54
  43. Yadav, 2019, Characterization of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) waste, Carbohydr. Polym., 212, 160, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.02.034 · DOI
  44. Zhao, 2020, Preparation and water vapor adsorption of “green” walnut-shell activated carbon by CO2 physical activation, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 38, 60, 10.1177/0263617419900849 · DOI
  45. Zheng, 2017, Effect of the torrefaction temperature on the structural properties and pyrolysis behavior of biomass, Bioresources, 12, 3425, 10.15376/biores.12.2.3425-3447 · DOI
  46. Zubair, 2020, Adsorption behavior and mechanism of methylene blue, crystal violet, Eriochrome black T, and methyl orange dyes onto biochar-derived date palm fronds waste produced at different pyrolysis conditions, Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 231, 1, 10.1007/s11270-020-04595-x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Abdullah, I., Ahmad, N., Hussain, M., Ahmed, A., Ahmed, U., & Park, Y.-K.
Affiliations
  • COMSATS University Islamabad (PK)
  • Victoria University (AU)
  • King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
  • University of Seoul (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Ahmad, Nabeel
  • Hussain, Murid
  • Park, Young-Kwon
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
295
Pages
133894
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210934377
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020M1A2A2079801, NRF-2021R1A2C3011274)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
torrefaction, biochar, walnut shell, pearl millet, lignocellulosic biomass, biomass blends, solid biofuels, coal substitute, torrefaction temperature, residence time, higher heating value, biochar yield, physicochemical properties
MeSH terms
Coal, Temperature, Biomass, Juglans, Pennisetum, Biofuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review