Cited by 38Process Optimization and IntegrationHeat Transfer and OptimizationIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization

A new approach in pinch technology considering piping costs in total cost targeting for heat exchanger network

Akbarnia, M., Amidpour, M., Shadaram, A.·2009·Chemical Engineering Research and Design

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cherd.2008.09.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akbarnia, M., Amidpour, M., & Shadaram, A.
Affiliations
K. N. Toosi University of Technology (IR)
Corresponding author
Amidpour, M.
Venue
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
87
Issue
3
Pages
357-365
ISSN
0263-8762 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076975854
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Process Safety and Environmental Protection (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Process Optimization and Integration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Keywords
pinch analysis, heat exchanger networks, capital cost optimization, energy costs, pressure rating

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review