Strategies To Improve the Performance of Hydrogen Storage Systems by Liquefaction Methods: A Comprehensive Review
Open accessAbstract
liquefaction cycles. In addition, the substitution of LNG cold recovery for the precooling cycle is associated with the lower SEC and cost compared to its combination with the precooling cycle.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes strategies to improve liquid hydrogen storage via liquefaction, focusing on reducing specific energy consumption (SEC) and cost while considering exergy, economics, safety, and environment. It concludes cost-efficient systems require production rates >100 tonne/day, efficiency >40%, SEC <6 kWh/kgLH2, and investment costs of 1–2 $/kgLH2.
Key findings
- Cost-efficient H2 liquefaction systems are those with production rates >100 tonne/day, efficiency >40%, SEC <6 kWh/kgLH2, and investment costs of 1–2 $/kgLH2; current commercial plants have SEC of 11.9–15 kWh/kgLH2 and price of 2.5–3 $/kgLH2.
- Increasing the stages of ortho- to para-H2 conversion lowers SEC and increases investment costs; using 2–3 reactors can balance SEC reduction and conversion reactor cost.
- Using low-temperature waste heat from industries and renewable energy in absorption cooling cycles (ACCs) for precooling is significantly more efficient than electricity generation in power generation cycles used for H2 liquefaction.
- LNG cold recovery substitution for the precooling cycle is associated with lower SEC and cost compared to its combination with the precooling cycle; one reported case reduced SEC by approximately 47.4% (from 11.7 to 6.15 kWh/kgLH2) and LCOH from 6.08 to 3 $/kgLH2.
Methods
- Design: comprehensive review of approaches to improve H2 liquefaction, including ACCs, ejector cooling, LN2/LNG/liquid air cold energy recovery, cascade and mixed refrigerant systems, integration with other structures, optimization algorithms, renewable energy, and pinch analysis.
- Data/sample: published studies, technical characteristics tables (e.g., Tables 2–12), plant data, and standards/codes; no primary experimental sample is used.
- Analysis: comparative synthesis of energy/exergy efficiency, SEC, capital/operating costs, capacity, complexity, emissions, safety, and standards, with identification of knowledge gaps.
Limitations
- Stated: more research is needed on the economic prospects of ACC replacement and ejector cooling; further study should focus on environmental impacts based on refrigerants, electricity consumption, and equipment type; risk analysis for liquid H2 fueling stations is restricted due to fewer operational stations.
- Evident: as a review, conclusions rely on reported literature and may be constrained by heterogeneous assumptions, scales, and process configurations across cited studies; no new experimental or simulation data are generated.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
22 of 246 cited sources checked · 9 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The main challenge in material-based H2 storage techniques is the development of progressive materials for efficient H2 storage.
“The main challenge in material-based techniques is the development of progressive materials for efficient H2 storage.50”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [50] source
- Premisecitation
The mutation and conversion rates can be enhanced by using proper catalysts such as sodium oxide, iron(III), nickel, chromium, manganese, all metals with paramagnetic properties, rhodium phosphine complex, potassium triphenyl complex, and ruthenium.
“The mutation and conversion rates can be enhanced by using proper catalysts of sodium oxide, iron(III), nickel, chromium, manganese, all metals with paramagnetic properties, rhodium phosphine complex, potassium triphenyl complex, and ruthenium.156”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [156] source
The Catalyst Survey and Activities of Catalysts sections (page numbers unavailable) report ortho–para hydrogen conversion using chromium, iron, nickel, and manganese catalysts, with some outperforming the chromic-oxide reference. The paper does not support sodium oxide, rhodium phosphine complex, potassium triphenyl complex, or ruthenium as catalysts, or the blanket claim that all paramagnetic metals enhance conversion. Its results also show that magnetic susceptibility alone did not ensure an outstanding catalyst. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Special liquid H2 storage tanks can solve the problem of transporting H2, especially over long distances.
“However, special liquid H2 storage tanks can solve the problem of transporting H2, especially over long distances.144”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [144] source
- Premisecitation
Cho et al. found that modification of the liquefaction structure using regasification of LNG and its optimization decreased the SEC from 4.36 to 4.07 kWh/kgLH2.
“The results indicated that the modification of the liquefaction structure using regasification of LNG and its optimization decreased the SEC from 4.36 to 4.07 kWh/kgLH2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [217] source
- Premisecitation
Theoretically, the minimum energy needed in the H2 liquefaction process for gaseous feed H2 at 25 bar is about 2.7 kWh/kgLH2.
“Theoretically, the minimum energy needed in the H2 liquefaction process for gaseous feed H2 at 25 bar is about 2.7 kWh/kgLH2.139”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [139] source
- Findingnone given
Substituting LNG cold recovery for the precooling cycle is associated with lower SEC and cost compared to its combination with the precooling cycle.
“In addition, the substitution of LNG cold recovery for the precooling cycle is associated with the lower SEC and cost compared to its combination with the precooling cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Increasing factory capacity from 5 to 100 TPD can decrease SEC to more than 6 kWh/kgLH2.
“The results revealed that by increasing the factory capacity from 5 to 100 TPD, the SEC could be decreased to more than 6 kWh/kgLH2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingcitation
Using LAC recovery system for precooling in H2 liquefaction leads to reductions in SEC, COP, and exergy efficiency of 6.916%, 22.04%, and 25.65%, respectively.
“Taghavi et al.85 revealed that using the LAC recovery system for the precooling in the H2 liquefaction cycle leads to a reduction of the SEC, coefficient of performance (COP), and exergy efficiency of 6.916%, 22.04%, and 25.65%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] source
- Findingnone given
Currently, the capacity of the H2 liquefaction plants presented in Table 12 is lower than the 100 TPD desired value.
“Currently, the capacity of the H2 liquefaction plants presented in Table 12 is lower than the 100 TPD as a desired value.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Increasing the stages of ortho- to para-H2 conversion increases investment costs.
“Increasing the stages in the conversion of ortho- to para-H2 lowers the SEC and increases the investment costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The main challenge for H2 storage based on physical adsorption is the small amount of H2 adsorbed in porous activated carbon materials, zeolites, organometallic-organic, and covalent frameworks at low temperatures.
“A small amount of H2 adsorbed in porous activated carbon materials, zeolites, organometallic–organic, and covalent frameworks at low temperatures is the main challenge for H2 storage based on physical adsorption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The precooling section of H2 liquefaction is critical in optimization because it has higher degrees of freedom than the cryogenic section.
“The precooling section is critical in optimization because it has higher freedom degrees than the cryogenic section.63”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] source
- Premisecitation
Chemical H2 storage based on ammonia and methanol is compatible with liquid H2 infrastructure.
“Chemical H2 storage based on ammonia (NH3) and methanol (CH3OH) is compatible with liquid H2 infrastructure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Dehydrogenation of ammonia and methanol requires a lot of energy and capital compared to LOHCs.
“However, their dehydrogenation requires a lot of energy and capital compared to the LOHCs.51−55”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
A reduction in pinch point increases the complexity and investment cost of heat exchangers.
“A reduction in pinch point increases the complexity and investment cost of heat exchangers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [101] source
- Premisecitation
Storage and distribution of H2 on a large scale is the main challenge due to its low energy density in the gas form.
“Storage and distribution of H2 on a large scale is the main challenge due to its low energy density in the gas form.26”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] source
- Premisecitation
LNG cold recovery for the precooling section has a promising prospect considering availability and price.
“In contrast, the LNG cold recovery (i.e., liquid methane) for the precooling section has a promising prospect considering availability and price.80”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] source
- Premisecitation
H2 low-temperature compression (cryo-compressed) reduces the problems caused by the volume and pressure required by compression methods and the IBOG losses due to liquefaction.
“H2 low-temperature compression (cryo-compressed) reduces the problems caused by the volume and pressure required by compression methods and the IBOG losses due to liquefaction; it is a promising strategy for H2 storage, but it has not yet been commercialized.43,44”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
According to the international demand for pure oxygen, LN2 will not be available as an inexpensive refrigerant for large-scale H2 liquefaction plants in the future.
“According to the international demand for pure oxygen, LN2 will not be available as an inexpensive refrigerant for large-scale H2 liquefaction plants in the future.184”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [184] source
- Premisecitation
The main advantage of the Claude system compared to the L-H process is the presence of an expansion device that partially powers the system.
“The main advantage of the Claude system (as an improved L–H process) compared to the L–H process is the presence of an expansion device that partially powers the system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The use of multicomponent refrigerants and different operating pressures increases the degree of freedom of precooling cycles compared to cryogenic processes.
“The use of multicomponent refrigerants as well as different operating pressures lead to an increase in the degree of freedom of precooling cycles compared to cryogenic processes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Using a closed-loop nitrogen cooling cycle and mixed refrigerants can solve the problem of LN2 inefficiency for large H2 liquefaction.
“Therefore, using a closed-loop nitrogen cooling cycle and mixed refrigerants can solve this problem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
By storing normal H2 inside a tank, the conversion enthalpy is released in the tank and causes liquid H2 losses.
“By storing normal H2 inside a tank, the conversion enthalpy is released in the tank and causes the liquid H2 losses.101,152”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisereasoning
At environment temperature, the number of ortho states is 3 times that of para-H2 (75% ortho-25% para).
“Therefore, the number of ortho states is 3 times that of para-H2 at environment temperature (i.e., 75% ortho–25% para).69,150”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
H2 liquefaction structures can be utilized for peak shaving within high energy demand in various industries.
“Also, H2 liquefaction structures can be utilized for peak shaving within high energy demand in various industries.145”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [145] Al-Hallaj S., 2017 source
- Premisecitation
The minimum exergy required to produce LN2 is twice the amount required to refrigerate the feed H2 to 80 K.
“Also, the minimum exergy required to produce LN2 is twice the amount required to refrigerate the feed H2 to 80 K.185”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [185] Walnum H. T., 2012, Refrig. Sci. Technol.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Claude processes are the most often used processes by industrial units compared to other cooling processes.
“Claude processes are the most often used processes by industrial units compared to other cooling processes.62”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [62] source
- Interpretationown data
The SEC, capital, and operational costs are reduced by employing LNG regasification instead of the precooling refrigerants in the H2 liquefaction cycle.
“The results indicate that the SEC, capital, and operational costs are reduced by employing the LNG regasification instead of the precooling refrigerants in the H2 liquefaction cycle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The most significant issue for cryogenic cooling involves the highly fluctuating specific heat of H2 near the critical temperature, which makes temperature stabilization in heat exchangers difficult.
“The most significant issue for cryogenic cooling involves the highly fluctuating specific heat of H2 near the critical temperature, which makes temperature stabilization in heat exchangers difficult.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [188] 1980
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The highest cost in the construction of hydrogen liquefaction plants belongs to the refrigeration cycles.
“Therefore, the highest cost in the construction of hydrogen liquefaction plants belongs to the refrigeration cycles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [174] source
- Interpretationreasoning
H2 and helium refrigerants are the most suitable options for H2 liquefaction.
“H2 and helium refrigerants are the most suitable options for H2 liquefaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The LH2 cold energy can be recycled in the LH2 supply chain, even if the H2 liquefaction and LH2 regasification steps occur in remote areas.
“Therefore, the LH2 cold energy can be recycled in the LH2 supply chain, even if the H2 liquefaction and LH2 regasification steps occur in remote areas.40”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] source
- Premisecitation
The Claude process uses more complex equipment compared to the L-H process.
“But, the Claude process uses more complex equipment compared to the L–H process.191”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [191] Sham R., 2011, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The application of the LAC recovery process in H2 liquefaction systems due to the simplicity of the structure has the potential of commercialization in the near future.
“The results indicated that the application of the LAC recovery process in H2 liquefaction systems due to the simplicity of the structure has the potential of commercialization in the near future.269”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [269] Riaz A., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Increasing the capacity of the H2 liquefaction cycle and using the MRC in precooling lead to a reduction of the SEC to less than 7 kWh/kgLH2.
“Increasing the capacity of the H2 liquefaction cycle and using the MRC in precooling lead to a reduction of the SEC to less than 7 kWh/kgLH2.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Using MRC increases the exergy efficiency in H2 liquefaction systems.
“It is concluded that using MRC increases the exergy efficiency in H2 liquefaction systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Precooling H2 gas in an ACC with geothermal energy reduced the SEC in the liquefaction cycle by 25.4%.
“Besides, precooling H2 gas in an ACC with geothermal energy reduced the SEC in the liquefaction cycle by 25.4%.70”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] source
- Premisecitation
Meta-heuristic algorithms were used to reduce the SEC in low-temperature natural gas and H2 liquefaction systems.
“Next, meta-heuristic algorithms were used to reduce the SEC in low-temperature natural gas285,286 and H2 liquefaction systems.82,287”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The system showed better performance when the ACC was used to produce refrigeration.
“The system showed better performance when the ACC was used to produce refrigeration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [261] source
- Premisecitation
By using mixed refrigerants instead of pure refrigerants in the H2 liquefaction structure, it is possible to modify the suitable temperature range of using the refrigeration system with pure refrigerants.
“By using mixed refrigerants instead of pure refrigerants in the H2 liquefaction structure, it is possible to modify the suitable temperature range of using the refrigeration system with pure refrigerants.197,198”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [197] Smith R., 2005
- cites [198] Lee, G.C. Optimal Design and Anaylysis of Refrigeration Systems For Low Temperature Processes. Thesis Dissertation, The University of Manchester, 2001.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
Absorption cooling systems are used as an alternative to compression cooling systems in H2 liquefaction processes to reduce the needed energy.
“Absorption cooling systems are used as an alternative to compression cooling systems in H2 liquefaction processes to reduce the needed energy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The SEC in the liquefaction plants currently operating in the world is about 13-15 kWh/kgLH2.
“The SEC in the liquefaction plants currently operating in the world is about 13–15 kWh/kgLH2.215”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [215] source
- Premisecitation
Mehrpooya et al. used the CCs in multistream heat exchangers to reduce the SEC in H2 liquefaction systems.
“Mehrpooya et al. used the CCs in multistream heat exchangers to reduce the SEC in H2 liquefaction systems.71,92,170,313−315”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The Claude process is more suitable than the inverse Brayton cycle considering cost and exergy rates.
“The results indicated that the Claude process is more suitable than the inverse Brayton cycle considering cost and exergy rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [323] source
- Premisecitation
Large-scale liquid H2 storage systems have emerged as a viable solution for efficiently increasing the capacity of H2 fuel stations.
“Moreover, large-scale liquid H2 storage systems have emerged as a viable solution for efficiently increasing the capacity of H2 fuel stations.379”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [379] source
- Premisecitation
Thermal integration in the system reduced power consumption by 8.61%.
“The results showed that thermal integration in the system reduced power consumption by 8.61%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [175] source
- Premisecitation
A powerful combination of meta-heuristic and artificial intelligence algorithms was developed for multiobjective optimization of H2 liquefaction cycle parameters.
“Recently, a powerful combination of meta-heuristic and artificial intelligence algorithms was developed for multiobjective optimization of H2 liquefaction cycle parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [179] source
- Premisecitation
Generally, in H2 liquefaction cycles, ΔTmin values are specified to be about 1-2 °C.
“Generally, in H2 liquefaction cycles, ΔTmin values are specified to be about 1–2 °C.26,71,92,212,214”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The cost of H2 liquefaction for the capacities of 1, 5, 10, and 50 TPD were reported to be 5.54, 4.75, 4.20, and 3.20 $/kgH2, respectively.
“The cost of H2 liquefaction for the capacities of 1, 5, 10, and 50 TPD were reported to be 5.54, 4.75, 4.20, and 3.20 $/kgH2, respectively.214”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [214] source
- Premisecitation
From well to wheel, the H2 prices at the filling station can be reduced to 5-7 €/kgH2 with a supply chain of liquid H2 compared to 8-10 €/kgH2 with compressed H2.
“From well to wheel, the H2 prices at the filling station can be reduced to 5–7 €/kgH2 with a supply chain of liquid H2 compared to 8–10 €/kgH2 with compressed H2.376”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [376] Kampitsch M., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
As long as there is no favorable demand for liquid H2 in a region, it will be difficult to invest in this sector.
“Therefore, as long as there is no favorable demand for liquid H2 in a region, it will be difficult to invest in this sector.159,364”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [159] source
- cites [364] Flynn T. M., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
By integrating mathematical programming approaches and pinch technology, Lee et al. proposed an efficient way for optimizing cryogenic systems.
“By integrating mathematical programming approaches and pinch technology, Lee et al.311 proposed an efficient way for optimizing cryogenic systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [311] Smith R., 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Several combined structures were developed for H2 purification and its liquefaction from coke oven gas (COG) and LNG production.
“Besides, several combined structures were developed for H2 purification and its liquefaction from coke oven gas (COG) and LNG production.157,356−359”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Thermal energy can be directly used in power generation cycles and ACCs to achieve refrigeration.
“Thermal energy can be directly used in power generation cycles and ACCs to achieve refrigeration.261,315”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
A complete knowledge of the cryogenic cycle arrangement and its distance from the optimal arrangement is gained using the CCs, GCCs, and heat exchanger networks as the qualitative indexes obtained from pinch analysis in H2 liquefaction systems.
“A complete knowledge of the cryogenic cycle arrangement and its distance from the optimal arrangement is gained using the CCs, GCCs, and heat exchanger networks as the qualitative indexes obtained from pinch analysis in H2 liquefaction systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Waste heat from fuel cells, Fischer-Tropsch reactors, and oxy-fuel power plants can be used to produce and liquefy H2.
“Waste heat from fuel cells, Fischer–Tropsch reactors, and oxy–fuel power plants can be used to produce and liquefy H2.146,174,179,224”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
When compared to lower scales, large-scale manufacturers are more cost effective and efficient at capacities higher than 100 TPD.
“When compared to lower scales, large-scale manufacturers are more cost effective and efficient at capacities higher than 100 TPD.365,366”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [365] 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [366] Connelly E., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Wind turbines and photovoltaic panels can be used directly to power compressors of H2 liquefaction cycles.
“Wind turbines175 and photovoltaic panels322 can be used directly to power compressors of H2 liquefaction cycles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
The cost ($/kgH2) of heat exchangers (3.40), supplements (0.7), and electricity (0.57) accounted for most of the costs.
“The cost ($/kgH2) of heat exchangers (3.40), supplements (0.7), and electricity (0.57) accounted for most of the costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [214] source
- Interpretationcitation
During the second day, the power supply systems are responsible for the majority of CO2 emissions.
“During the second day, however, the power supply systems are responsible for the majority of CO2 emissions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Using ACCs in H2 liquefaction cycles decreases the SEC.
“Using ACCs in H2 liquefaction cycles decreases the SEC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Polyester sheets covered with alumina, changing coatings of glass fiber and aluminum foil, or perlite particles, silica, and aluminum are utilized as protection against heat transfer through radiation.
“Using polyester sheets covered with alumina, changing coatings of glass fiber and aluminum foil, or perlite particles, silica, and aluminum as protection against heat transfer through radiation are utilized.404”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [404] source
- Interpretationnone given
The capital and operating costs of several liquefaction structures reviewed in this article are reduced by using an ACC for precooling.
“The capital and operating costs of several liquefaction structures reviewed in this article are reduced by using an ACC for precooling; however, more research is needed to provide firm comments/tips on the impact of this replacement on economic prospect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The use of an ejector cooling system lowers the SEC in liquefaction systems.
“Although the use of an ejector cooling system lowers the SEC in liquefaction systems, additional research is needed to evaluate the economic aspects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Exposure of ortho- to para-H2 conversion reactors to impurities can lead to catalyst poisoning and its gradual deactivation.
“Exposure of ortho- to para-H2 conversion reactors to impurities can lead to catalyst poisoning and its gradual deactivation.322”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [322] source
- Premisecitation
Liquid H2 is held in containers with double walls and a high vacuum between them to reduce the rate of heat transmission by convection and conduction.
“Moreover, liquid H2 is held in containers with double walls and a high vacuum between them to reduce the rate of heat transmission by convection and conduction.403”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [403] source
- Interpretationnone given
The use of mixed refrigerant cycle controllers causes an increase in the capital cost.
“The use of mixed refrigerant cycle controllers causes an increase in the capital cost.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The high costs of purchasing special H2 compressors can be compensated by high-pressure electrolysis.
“The high costs of purchasing special H2 compressors can be compensated by high-pressure electrolysis.102,411,412”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [102] source
- cites [411] source
- cites [412] Al-Hamed, K. H. Modeling and experimental investigation of renewable energy and ammonia-based systems for carbon capturing and useful outputs. Thesis; University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2022.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisereasoning
The risk analysis associated with running stations using liquid H2 fuel is restricted.
“As a result, the risk analysis associated with running stations using liquid H2 fuel is restricted.388”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [388] source
- Premisecitation
Cardella et al. introduced two short- to midterm and long-term solutions to achieve a cost-effective H2 liquefaction system.
“Cardella et al.93,102 introduced two short- to midterm and long-term solutions to achieve a cost-effective H2 liquefaction system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Integrating industrial systems and H2 liquefaction cycles can help decrease the production costs and SEC.
“Besides, integrating industrial systems and H2 liquefaction cycles can help decrease the production costs and SEC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Using LNG regasification in H2 liquefaction cycles reduces the SEC.
“Using LNG regasification in H2 liquefaction cycles reduces the SEC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Kim et al. estimated 67.85 and 0.253 kgCO2eq emissions for the LH2 production process on the first and second day, respectively.
“The life cycle analysis of the structure modeled by Kim et al.214 estimated 67.85 and 0.253 kgCO2eq emissions for the LH2 production process first and second day, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [214] source
- Premisecitation
Moradi et al. reported an SEC of 6 kWh/kgLH2 for cost-effective H2 liquefaction plants.
“Moradi et al.28 reported an SEC of 6 kWh/kgLH2 for cost-effective H2 liquefaction plants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] source
- Premisecitation
Precooling cycles in H2 liquefaction units can use inexpensive feedstock LN2 that comes directly from air separation units to produce liquid oxygen.
“Precooling cycles in H2 liquefaction units can use inexpensive feedstock LN2 that comes directly from air separation units to produce liquid oxygen.62,77”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Waste refrigeration to sea for LNG at an import terminal can be used for precooling to 130 K temperature.
“Waste refrigeration to sea for LNG at an import terminal can be used for precooling to 130 K temperature.86”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Kuendig A., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
The refrigerants employed in the liquid cycle contribute significantly to the first-day emissions.
“The refrigerants employed in the liquid cycle contribute significantly to the first-day emissions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The SEC is reduced when mixed refrigerant cycles are used in H2 liquefaction operations.
“The SEC is reduced when mixed refrigerant cycles are used in H2 liquefaction operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Using 2-3 reactors can be effective in achieving a balance between reducing the SEC and increasing the cost of conversion reactors.
“Using 2–3 reactors can be effective in achieving a balance between reducing the SEC and increasing the cost of conversion reactors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
LNG regasification substitution of the precooling cycle is associated with a lower SEC and cost compared to the hybrid of LNG regasification with the precooling cycle.
“Also, LNG regasification substitution of the precooling cycle is associated with a lower SEC and cost compared to the hybrid of LNG regasification with the precooling cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 62
- May combine two claims. 102
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCost-efficient H2 liquefaction systems have production rates greater than 100 tonne/day, efficiency greater than 40%, SEC less than 6 kWh/kgLH2, and investment costs of 1-2 $/kgLH2.
“The cost-efficient H2 liquefaction systems are those with higher production rates (>100 tonne/day), higher efficiency (>40%), lower SEC (<6 kWh/kgLH2), and lower investment costs (1–2 $/kgLH2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] source
Sections 3.6 and 5.2 link plants of around 100 tonnes/day or more with lower liquefaction costs, and section 3.3 describes a conceptual 100-tonne/day process with 43% exergy efficiency and the potential for SEC below 6 kWh/kg. But these are projections or targets, not established criteria for cost-efficient systems. The cited figures concern liquefaction cost per kilogram, not investment cost, and do not establish the claimed $1–2/kg investment-cost range. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe densities of liquid H2 and high-pressure gas are 70.8 and under 40 kg/m3, respectively.
“The densities of liquid H2 and high-pressure gas, are, respectively 70.8 and under 40 kg/m3.41”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ortho- to para-H2 conversion appears with a transition from the ortho triplet state to a para singlet state, which in the normal state is very slow.
“The ortho- to para-H2 conversion appears with a transition from the ortho triplet state to a para singlet state, which in the normal state of this transition is very slow, and more time is spent in this process.101,152,153”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [101] source
- cites [152] source
- cites [153] Baker C., 1979
The passages in section 4.2 and the appendices discuss hydrogen-liquefaction costs, not the mechanism or speed of ortho-to-para conversion. Searches for the triplet-to-singlet transition, conversion rate, and catalysts found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationH2 energy storage is the main option for longer periods with higher storage capacity.
“Hydrogen (H2) energy storage is the main option for longer periods with higher storage capacity.12,13”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [12] source
Section 2.1 (page unavailable) describes hydrogen as one of the promising technologies for long-term, large-scale energy storage, supporting the duration and capacity aspects. It does not call hydrogen the main option; the same section identifies pumped hydro as the leading storage technology. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [13] Valenti G., 2016 source
The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationNoh et al. found that the SEC in the first and second LNG cold recovery structures decreased by 5.14% and 8.13%, respectively, compared to the basic cycle.
“Similar results demonstrated that the SEC in the first and second structures has decreased by 5.14% and 8.13%, respectively, compared to the basic cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [223] source
The SEC comparison in the paper’s “Parameter Value” passage reports reductions of 5.11% for Design 1 and 8.13% for Design 2 relative to the base case. The citing sentence matches the second figure but gives 5.14% rather than 5.11% for the first; no page number is provided for this passage. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost of the cold energy of LNG (830 kJ/kg) is lost in seawater as it changes phase from liquid (114 K) to gas or is partially heated before being compressed and entering pipelines.
“In general, most of the cold energy of LNG (830 kJ/kg) is lost in seawater as it changes phase from liquid (114 K) to gas or is partially heated before being compressed and entering pipelines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [217] source
The Introduction says that a large amount of LNG cold energy is typically discarded to seawater during regasification. Section 2 describes approximately 220 kcal/kg of recoverable energy and an LNG inlet temperature of −165 °C, but does not support the claimed 830 kJ/kg or 114 K. The cited passages also do not establish the stated sequence of partial heating, compression, and pipeline entry. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe main advantages of a mixed refrigerant system over pure refrigerant cycles are the simpler arrangement of its cycle equipment, its greater flexibility to provide cooling at different temperature levels by changing the percentage of refrigerant composition, and the system's greater reversibility in a temperature range due to refrigerant evaporation.
“The main advantages of a mixed refrigerant system over pure refrigerant cycles are the simpler arrangement of its cycle equipment, its greater flexibility to provide cooling at different temperature levels by changing the percentage of refrigerant composition, and the system’s greater reversibility in a temperature range due to refrigerant evaporation.181,270,271”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [181] Mafi, M. Development in mixed refrigerant cycles for separation systems of petrochemical industries and thermo-economical optimization through combined pinch and exergy analysis. Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khajeh Nasir Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, 2009.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [270] source
- cites [271] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe essential instruments in the targeting phase of CPEA are exergy composite diagrams (ECCs) and exergy grand composite diagrams (EGCCs), which are obtained by replacing the temperature axis in the CCs and GCCs with the Carnot factor.
“The essential instruments in the targeting phase of CPEA are exergy composite diagrams (ECCs) and exergy grand composite diagrams (EGCCs), which are obtained by replacing the temperature axis in the CCs and GCCs with the Carnot factor .283,307−310”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [283] source
Section 5 (page not available in our copy) says that replacing temperature with the Carnot factor in composite curves produces exergy composite curves (ECCs), which the authors use in an exergy-loss targeting analysis. The paper discusses grand composite curves separately in Section 2, but the passages do not describe exergy grand composite curves (EGCCs) or identify ECCs and EGCCs together as essential instruments in CPEA targeting. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [307] source
- cites [308] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationComposite curves (CC) and grand composite curves (GCC) are the essential tools of pinch technology to achieve the desired goals in the goal-setting stage.
“Composite curves (CC) and grand composite curves (GCC) are the essential tools of pinch technology to achieve the desired goals in the goal-setting stage.305,306”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [305] source
- cites [306] source
The passage discussing prior hydrogen-liquefaction work says that researchers applied the pinch method to heat exchangers, but it does not discuss composite curves or grand composite curves. Searches for those curves and their role in goal-setting found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMechanical, electrical, thermal, and chemical energy storage techniques are often used.
“Mechanical, electrical, thermal, and chemical energy storage techniques are often used.318,319”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [318] source
- cites [319] source
The Introduction (page not provided) says energy may be stored in mechanical, chemical, or thermal forms and identifies compressed air storage as a mechanical method. It does not include electrical storage in that list or establish how often the listed techniques are used. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis integration leads to higher efficiency, lower environmental influence, and lower expenses.
“This integration leads to higher efficiency, lower environmental influence, and lower expenses.175,333”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [175] source
- cites [333] source
The Discussion says using nuclear waste heat improves the cycle’s overall efficiency, and the Simulation results say the process could eliminate greenhouse-gas emissions. But those results also say its efficiency is currently lower than SMR’s and that costs may fall eventually; they do not establish that the integration already delivers lower expenses. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStandards rules are essential to ensure the safety of commercial H2 equipment and processes.
“The standards generally establish technical definitions, minimum performance criteria, and fundamental principles for building and testing H2 liquefaction systems; these rules are essential to ensure the safety of commercial H2 equipment and processes.392”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [392] Yang Y., 2019 source
Section 2.4 describes hydrogen standards as a basis for standardization and lists standards for the safety of hydrogen systems, materials, production, and storage. This supports the general point that standards matter for hydrogen safety, but the cited paper does not establish the sentence’s more specific claim about rules for building and testing H2 liquefaction systems. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe two main purposes for the supply chain of liquid H2 in the future are decreasing the specific liquefaction cost and the SEC to 1-2 US$/kgH2 and 6-8 kWh/kgLH2, respectively.
“The two main purposes for the supply chain of liquid H2 in the future are decreasing the specific liquefaction cost and the SEC to 1–2 US$/kgH2 and 6–8 kWh/kgLH2, respectively.59”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExisting liquefaction systems use adsorbents to remove impurities, which may not be suitable for large systems (i.e., >50 TPD).
“Existing liquefaction systems use adsorbents to remove impurities, which may not be suitable for large systems (i.e., >50 TPD).59”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [59] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe three main factors for the development of the main standards of H2 fueling stations based on risk assessment techniques include (i) the various contexts and infrastructures involved, (ii) the probability of leakage, failure, and combustion, and (iii) the physical behavior of H2 in release, combustion, and accumulation.
“The three main factors for the development of the main standards of H2 fueling stations based on risk assessment techniques include (i) the various contexts and infrastructures involved, (ii) the probability of leakage, failure, and combustion, and (iii) the physical behavior of H2 in release, combustion, and accumulation.387”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [387] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStandards generally establish technical definitions, minimum performance criteria, and fundamental principles for building and testing H2 liquefaction systems.
“The standards generally establish technical definitions, minimum performance criteria, and fundamental principles for building and testing H2 liquefaction systems; these rules are essential to ensure the safety of commercial H2 equipment and processes.392”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [392] Yang Y., 2019 source
Section 2.4 (page not provided) identifies hydrogen standards covering terminology, safety, construction and testing, which supports the general description of what hydrogen standards address. But the paper does not establish that these standards set minimum performance criteria or fundamental principles for building and testing H2 liquefaction systems specifically; its liquid-hydrogen examples concern vehicle tanks and fuelling interfaces. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe total on-site storage capacity at LC-39B is about 8000 m3.
“The total on-site storage capacity at LC-39B is about 8000 m3.417,418”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [417] Fesmire J. E., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [418] Fesmire J., 2022 source
The Abstract says the new tank at Launch Complex 39B will add 4,700 m³, bringing total on-site capacity to roughly 8,000 m³. It describes that total as a future capacity, not one already available, while the claim says the capacity “is” about 8,000 m³. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIncreasing the stages of ortho- to para-H2 conversion lowers the SEC of H2 liquefaction, with rapid reduction from the first to the second reactor and slow reduction thereafter.
“Increasing the stages in the conversion of ortho- to para-H2 lowers the SEC and increases the investment costs.”
- Also stated in: § Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Hydrogen · plain
“The SEC of the H2 liquefaction cycle is decreased by increasing the stages of ortho- to para-H2 conversion. The slope of reducing the SEC by increasing the ortho- to para-H2 conversion stages from the first to the second reactor is done rapidly, and from the second reactor onward, it is done slowly.164”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [164] source
- Also stated in: § Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Hydrogen · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe improvement rate of efficiency (energy and exergy) in some techniques for decreasing SEC is low compared to the reduction in total expenses and an increase in system complexities.
“Also, the improvement rate of efficiency (energy and exergy) in some techniques for decreasing the SEC is low compared to the reduction in total expenses and an increase in system complexities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenIn most research works on H2 liquefaction systems, more emphasis has been placed on lowering SEC while capital/operating costs, complexity levels, and relative emissions have been overlooked.
“Nonetheless, it can be noticed that in most research works on H2 liquefaction systems, more emphasis has been placed on lowering the SEC while capital/operating costs, complexity levels, and relative emissions have been overlooked.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenNo comprehensive review studies have been conducted to improve the performance of hydrogen liquefaction systems considering energy consumption, energy/exergy efficiency, capital/operating costs, capacity, complexity levels, and relative emissions.
“To the best of our knowledge, no comprehensive review studies have been conducted to improve the performance of hydrogen liquefaction systems considering energy consumption, energy/exergy efficiency, capital/operating costs, capacity, complexity levels, and relative emissions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe majority of the H2 liquefaction factories listed are in North American countries.
“The majority of these factories are in North American countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenA hydrogen liquefaction capacity of 263 MTPD was reported in North America.
“A hydrogen liquefaction capacity of 263 MTPD was reported in North America.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCalifornia, Louisiana, Indiana, New York, Alabama, Ontario, Quebec, and Tennessee were assigned 30, 70, 30, 40, 30, 30, 27, and 6, respectively.
“California, Louisiana, Indiana, New York, Alabama, Ontario, Quebec, and Tennessee were assigned 30, 70, 30, 40, 30, 30, 27, and 6, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLiquid hydrogen storage faces high specific energy consumption, low exergy efficiency, high total expenses, and boil-off gas losses.
“The main challenges of liquid hydrogen (H2) storage as one of the most promising techniques for large-scale transport and long-term storage include its high specific energy consumption (SEC), low exergy efficiency, high total expenses, and boil-off gas losses.”
- Also stated in: § Hydrogen Storage Importance · plain
“The main challenges for liquid H2 (LH2) storage include its high specific energy consumption (SEC), low exergy efficiency, and inevitable boil-off gas (IBOG) losses.39,40”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- Also stated in: § Hydrogen Storage Importance · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIsothermal converters eliminate the flow temperature increase in adiabatic reactors, but increase the equipment required in the liquefaction procedure, increasing operational and capital costs.
“Isothermal converters are used to eliminate the flow temperature increase in adiabatic reactors, but this method increases the equipment required in the liquefaction procedure, which increases operational and capital costs.69”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationContinuous conversion has the highest efficiency and the lowest energy consumption compared to isothermal and adiabatic methods.
“Continuous conversion has the highest efficiency and the lowest energy consumption compared to isothermal and adiabatic methods.163”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [163] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationH2 low-temperature compression is a promising strategy for H2 storage but has not yet been commercialized.
“H2 low-temperature compression (cryo-compressed) reduces the problems caused by the volume and pressure required by compression methods and the IBOG losses due to liquefaction; it is a promising strategy for H2 storage, but it has not yet been commercialized.43,44”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationH2, helium, and Ne are the candidates used separately and in mixtures for the cooling and liquefaction steps.
“H2, helium, and Ne are the candidates used separately and in mixtures for the cooling and liquefaction steps.187”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [187] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationH2 transportation in the gaseous state requires large storage tanks with high pressure, which is not justified due to the tank's resistance.
“Therefore, H2 transportation in the gaseous state requires large storage tanks with high pressure, which is not justified due to the tank’s resistance.143”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [143] source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe ortho- to para-H2 conversion is essential for LH2 production in distant transport and to decrease IBOG losses.
“Thus, the ortho- to para-H2 conversion is essential for LH2 production in distant transport and to decrease IBOG losses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe dehydrogenation temperatures of CH3OH, LOHCs, and NH3 are up to 420, 50-250, and 650 °C, respectively.
“The dehydrogenation temperatures of CH3OH, LOHCs, and NH3 were reported to be up to 420, 50–250, and 650 °C, respectively.53,56”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdiabatic converters are easy to accomplish but increase the flow temperature after the exchangers and require numerous beds, causing an increase in temperature and cost and a reduction in thermal efficiency.
“Adiabatic converters are easy to accomplish, but they increase the flow temperature after the exchangers and require numerous beds, which causes an increase in temperature and cost and a reduction in thermal efficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOrtho-H2 has a higher energy grade than para-H2 and is an excited condition; para-H2 has a lower energy surface and is easily formed at a lower temperature.
“The ortho-H2 with a higher energy grade than para-H2 is an excited condition. Also, para-H2 with a lower energy surface is easily formed at a lower temperature.157”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [157] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEnvironmentally friendly fuels for storing H2 include chemical-based fuels such as methanol, ammonia, and formic acid, but they are not cost effective in pure H2 production due to high SEC at high temperatures for dehydrogenation and purification.
“Environmentally friendly fuels for storing H2 include chemical-based fuels such as methanol, ammonia, and formic acid. Nowadays, they are not cost effective in pure H2 production due to the high SEC at high temperatures for dehydrogenation and purification.53”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [53] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLiquefaction storage systems face challenges such as a lack of efficiency, high economic expense, and a lack of creative technological advancement.
“Notwithstanding the numerous advantages of liquefaction storage systems, it should be highlighted that these technologies face numerous challenges, such as a lack of efficiency, a high economic expense, and a lack of creative technological advancement.146”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [146] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe boiling and melting points for para-H2 are 0.1 K lower than those of normal H2.
“The boiling and melting point for para-H2 are 0.1 K lower than those of normal H2.151”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151] Fukai Y., 2006 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor large H2 liquefaction factories, the high-temperature difference in low temperatures prevents using LN2; using LN2 for precooling up to 80 K is less efficient.
“For large H2 liquefaction factories, the high-temperature difference in low temperatures prevents using LN2; using LN2 for precooling up to 80 K is less efficient.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [185] Walnum H. T., 2012, Refrig. Sci. Technol.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationExpanders can be used to lower the temperature of H2 during an isentropic expansion process, which always reduces the temperature of ideal and nonideal gases.
“Moreover, expanders can be used to lower the temperature of H2 during an isentropic expansion process, which always reduces the temperature of ideal and nonideal gases.186”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [186] Maytal B.-Z., 2012 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStandard H2 storage tanks operate at 350-700 bar and have not yet reached the DOE storage targets of 6.5 wt% or 0.050 kgH2/L for on-board H2 storage.
“Standard H2 storage tanks are used at an operating pressure of 350–700 bar and have not yet reached the storage gravimetric/volumetric target of 6.5 wt % or 0.050 kgH2/L for the desired driving range (the Department of Energy (DOE) targets for on-board H2 storage).33−38”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningH2 gas cannot be liquefied at ambient temperature only by using the J-T process, and a precooling process is necessary.
“As a result, H2 gas cannot be liquefied at ambient temperature only by using the J–T process, and a precooling process is necessary.182”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [182] Weisend J. G., 1998
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIncreasing the capacity of H2 liquefaction systems increases capital investment and system complexity.
“Moreover, increasing the capacity of H2 liquefaction systems increases capital investment and system complexity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPart of the cooling can be done at a higher temperature by compressing the feed to a greater pressure, which reduces the power consumption to provide the needed refrigeration but boosts the cost of condensation at ambient temperature.
“Part of the cooling can be done at a higher temperature by compressing the feed to a greater pressure, which reduces the power consumption to provide the needed refrigeration but boosts the cost of condensation at ambient temperature.185”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [185] Walnum H. T., 2012, Refrig. Sci. Technol.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ortho- to para-H2 conversion is exothermic and temperature associated, causing some H2 to be wasted as boil-off gas when storing liquid H2.
“The ortho- to para-H2 conversion is exothermic and temperature associated. As a result, when storing liquid H2, some of the H2 is wasted, which is called boil-off gas.158,159”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Claude cycle uses more heat exchangers to liquefy H2 and has greater efficiency than the L-H process.
“Also, the Claude cycle compared to the L–H process uses more heat exchangers to liquefy H2 and has a greater efficiency.68,69”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMetal hydrides have problems such as high adsorption/desorption temperatures, low reversibility, mass density limitations, slow kinetics, and the energy required, and most research investigations are conducted at a laboratory scale.
“Metal hydrides have special problems, such as high adsorption/desorption temperatures, low reversibility, mass density limitations, slow kinetics, and the energy required, and most research investigations are conducted at a laboratory scale.48,49”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenBy decreasing the temperature to the normal boiling point of H2 (21.2 K), approximately 99.9% para-H2 can be produced.
“By decreasing the temperature to the normal boiling point of H2 (21.2 K), approximately 99.9% para-H2 can be produced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe selection of the appropriate precooling refrigerant and the optimal configuration of the precooling section provide promising guidelines for reducing the total SEC in the liquefaction structure.
“The selection of the appropriate precooling refrigerant and the optimal configuration of the precooling section provide promising guidelines for reducing the total SEC in the liquefaction structure.176”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [176] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost studies on physical adsorption for H2 storage are on a laboratory scale and did not meet DOE technical requirements.
“Most of the studies about this method are on a laboratory scale that did not meet the DOE technical requirements.30,45−47”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationUsing LAC recovery instead of the two-stage MRC in the H2 liquefaction system reduced the SEC, COP, and exergy yield from 6.42 to 5.955 kWh/kgLH2, 0.1642 to 0.1280, and 39.41% to 29.3%, respectively.
“The results revealed that using LAC recovery instead of the two-stage MRC in the H2 liquefaction system reduced the SEC, COP, and exergy yield from 6.42 to 5.955 kWh/kgLH2, 0.1642 to 0.1280, and 39.41% to 29.3%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe SEC, COP, and exergy yield in the basic H2 liquefaction process were 7.69 kWh/kgLH2, 0.1710, and 39.5%, respectively.
“The SEC, COP, and exergy yield in the basic H2 liquefaction process71 were 7.69 kWh/kgLH2, 0.1710, and 39.5%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe SEC, specific CO2 emissions, and exergy yield were calculated to be 6.71 kWh/kgLH2, 2.641 kgCO2/kgLH2, and 35.7%, respectively.
“The SEC, specific CO2 emissions, and exergy yield were calculated to be 6.71 kWh/kgLH2, 2.641 kgCO2/kgLH2, and 35.7%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMixed refrigerant precooling systems can be used as an auxiliary precooling part of H2 liquefaction systems and consume less power and are more efficient than closed single-component cycles.
“Mixed refrigerant precooling systems can be used as an auxiliary precooling part of H2 liquefaction systems. These systems consume less power and are more efficient than closed single-component cycles.175”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [175] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe exergy yield and SEC of the system were calculated to be 31.6% and 12.7 kWh/kgLH2, respectively.
“The exergy yield and SEC of the system were calculated to be 31.6% and 12.7 kWh/kgLH2, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe COP and exergy yield of the developed liquefaction process were 0.162 and 67.9%, respectively.
“Also, the COP and exergy yield of the developed liquefaction process were 0.162 and 67.9%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Claude process has higher liquefaction efficiency and lower power consumption than the L-H process.
“The Claude process has higher liquefaction efficiency and lower power consumption than the L–H process.170”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [170] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the Claude process with a helium precooler, the size of the compressor is smaller than that in the Claude process, but three separate compressors are needed for H2, nitrogen, and helium.
“In this process, the size of the compressor is smaller than that in the Claude process, but three separate compressors are needed for H2, nitrogen, and helium.189”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [189] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe exergy yield, SEC, and COP in the basic H2 liquefaction process were 39.5%, 7.69 kWh/kgLH2, and 0.1710, respectively.
“The exergy yield, SEC, and COP in the basic H2 liquefaction process92 were 39.5%, 7.69 kWh/kgLH2, and 0.1710, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe SEC, COP, and exergy yield in the optimized H2 liquefaction system were calculated to be 11.52 kWh/kgLH2, 0.346, and 69.44%, respectively.
“The SEC, COP, and exergy yield in the optimized H2 liquefaction system were calculated to be 11.52 kWh/kgLH2, 0.346, and 69.44%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe cost of liquid H2 produced by the ORC and ACC was 3.8 and 3.6 $/kgLH2, respectively.
“The cost of liquid H2 produced by the ORC and ACC was 3.8 and 3.6 $/kgLH2, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [261] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the Claude process with a helium precooler, helium gas in addition to LN2 is used for precooling, reducing the pressure required for the compressor's H2 output and the SEC.
“Helium gas, in addition to LN2, is used for precooling in the Claude process with a helium precooler. As a result, the pressure required for the compressor’s H2 output as well as its SEC are reduced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [189] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAsadnia et al. found that the SEC, COP, and exergy yield of the H2 liquefaction system were 6.47 kWh/kgLH2, 0.2034, and 45.5%, respectively.
“The SEC, COP, and exergy yield of the H2 liquefaction system were 6.47 kWh/kgLH2, 0.2034, and 45.5%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe COP of the Claude liquefaction process was 0.0120, and its exergy yield was 67.3%.
“The COP of the Claude liquefaction process was 0.0120, and its exergy yield was 67.3%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMixed refrigerant cooling systems, absorption/ejector refrigerating cycles, LNG regasification operations for precooling, operational optimization, pinch and exergy analyses, and integration with the same manufacturing process can help reduce the SEC.
“Mixed refrigerant cooling systems, absorption/ejector refrigerating cycles, LNG regasification operations for precooling, operational optimization, pinch and exergy analyses, and integration with the same manufacturing process can help to reduce the SEC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWith the increment in geothermal rate, the exergy and energy utilization factors of the hybrid structure decline from 0.21 to 0.13 and from 0.059 to 0.037, respectively.
“With the increment in geothermal rate, the exergy and energy utilization factors of the hybrid structure decline from 0.21 to 0.13 and from 0.059 to 0.037, respectively.262”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [262] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe SEC and thermodynamic efficiency due to ortho- to para-H2 conversion in the basic H2 liquefaction system in the Ingolstadt factory were 13.58 kWh/kgLH2 and 21.28%, respectively.
“Also, the SEC and thermodynamic efficiency due to the ortho- to para-H2 conversion in the basic H2 liquefaction system in the Ingolstadt factory were 13.58 kWh/kgLH2 and 21.28%, respectively.205”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [205] Krasae-in, S. Efficient hydrogen liquefaction processes. Doctoral Thesis, NTNU, 2013.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLater, Haselden et al., Perrett, and Gaumer et al. expanded and developed the idea of utilizing mixed refrigerants for various applications.
“Later, Haselden et al.,273,274 Perrett,275 and Gaumer et al.276 expanded and developed the idea of utilizing mixed refrigerants for various applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [273] Barber N., 1957, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng.
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [274] source
- cites [275] Perret, J. C. Method and apparatus for the cooling and low temperature liquefaction of gaseous mixtures. US Patent 3364685, 1968.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe SEC in the H2 liquefaction unit was calculated to be 10.06 kWh/kgLH2.
“The SEC in the H2 liquefaction unit was calculated to be 10.06 kWh/kgLH2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRiaz et al. found that using LNG cold recovery in the precooling stage reduced the total amount of refrigerant by 50% and the SEC by 40%, and reported an exergy efficiency of 42.25%.
“This structural modification reduced the total amount of refrigerant by 50% and the SEC by 40%. The exergy efficiency of the hybrid design was reported to be 42.25%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUsing H2 as refrigerant has drawbacks including inability to decrease temperature below the H2 boiling point, high SEC of compressors, and high penetration in equipment due to low molecular mass and low system efficiency.
“Its application includes drawbacks such as the inability to decrease the temperature below the H2 boiling point, the high SEC of compressors, and high penetration in equipment structure due to low molecular mass and low system efficiency.165,194”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [165] Quack H., 2002 source
- cites [194] Notardonato, W. U. Analysis and testing of an integrated refrigeration and storage system for liquid hydrogen zero boil-off, liquefaction, and densification. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida, 2006.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationYang et al. found that the SEC decreased from 13.58 to 11.05 kWh/kgLH2 in the modified structure using LNG cold recovery.
“Furthermore, the SEC decreased from 13.58 to 11.05 kWh/kgLH2 in the modified structure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe SEC, COP, and exergy yield of the developed structure were calculated to be 7.405 kWh/kgLH2, 0.103, and 0.2359, respectively.
“The SEC, COP, and exergy yield of the developed structure were calculated to be 7.405 kWh/kgLH2, 0.103, and 0.2359, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [264] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTo prevent weakening of thermal properties, the maximum usable amount of Ne is 30%.
“To prevent the weakening of the thermal properties, the maximum usable amount of Ne was suggested to be 30%.196”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [196] Quack H., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe unit exergetic liquefaction price of H2 in the optimal state was 1.114 $/kgLH2.
“The unit exergetic liquefaction price of H2 in the optimal state was 1.114 $/kgLH2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe optimal exergetic cost of liquid H2 was calculated to be 1.349 $/kgLH2.
“Also, the optimal exergetic cost of liquid H2 was calculated to be 1.349 $/kgLH2.73”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe specific energy consumption (SEC) of current H2 liquefaction systems is 10.8-12.7 kWh/kgLH2 for the Claude system and 12.3-13.4 kWh/kgLH2 for the Brayton structure.
“The SEC of current H2 liquefaction systems is 10.8–12.7 kWh/kgLH2 for the Claude system and 12.3–13.4 kWh/kgLH2 for the Brayton structure.192”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [192] Ohlig K., 2014 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGhorbani et al. found that the developed process' SEC decreased from 4.410 to 4.022 kWh/kgLH2 compared to the basic plant, and its exergy efficiency increased from 55.47% to 73.75%.
“The results showed that the developed process’ SEC decreased from 4.410 to 4.022 kWh/kgLH2 compared to the basic plant,170 and its exergy efficiency increased from 55.47% to 73.75%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn H2 liquefaction with the Claude and L-H methods, cooling is achieved by isentropic expansion through the expander and isothermal expansion by the J-T valve.
“In H2 liquefaction with the Claude and L–H methods, cooling is achieved by isentropic expansion through the expander and isothermal expansion by the J–T valve.185”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [185] Walnum H. T., 2012, Refrig. Sci. Technol.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHelium refrigerant and Ne gas were proposed to solve the problems caused by H2; helium's larger molecular mass significantly reduces power consumption and its penetration decreases due to larger molecules.
“Helium refrigerant and Ne gas were proposed to solve the problems caused by H2; the larger molecular mass of helium significantly reduces the power consumption, and its penetration decreases due to the larger molecules of helium.78,195”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe thermodynamic efficiency according to ortho- to para-H2 conversion and the SEC of the Krasae-in et al. system were 54.02% and 5.35 kWh/kgLH2, respectively.
“The thermodynamic efficiency according to ortho- to para-H2 conversion and the SEC were obtained at 54.02% and 5.35 kWh/kgLH2, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationEmploying geothermal power in the ACC reduces the power required for H2 liquefaction and is more advantageous than using geothermal power output in a liquefaction process.
“It was found that employing geothermal power in the ACC reduces the power required for H2 liquefaction and is more advantageous than using geothermal power output in a liquefaction process.260”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [260] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ACC could cool H2 gas to −26.9 °C; the COP of the ACC was 0.556 with an exergy yield of 67.0%.
“The ACC could cool H2 gas to −26.9 °C; the COP of the ACC was 0.556 with an exergy yield of 67.0%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn 1936, Podbielniam presented the first mixed refrigerant cryogenic cycle.
“In 1936, Podbielniam272 presented the first mixed refrigerant cryogenic cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [272] Podbielniak, W.J. Art of refrigeration. U.S. Patent 2041725, 1986.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMixed refrigerants can be used in all refrigeration systems, including single-compression refrigeration cycles, CRCs, and multistage refrigeration units.
“Mixed refrigerants can be used in all refrigeration systems, including single-compression refrigeration cycles, CRCs, and multistage refrigeration units.197”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [197] Smith R., 2005
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn increase in the input H2 pressure fixes the problem of fluctuating specific heat, and the compression process reduces the cooling load over a wide temperature range, but the variable cooling load should be managed by adjusting the cooling power.
“An increase in the input H2 pressure fixes this problem, somehow. The compression process reduces the cooling load over a wide temperature range, but the variable cooling load should be managed by adjusting the cooling power.188”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [188] 1980
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMany studies have focused on using mixed refrigerants to reach low temperatures.
“Besides, many studies have focused on using mixed refrigerants to reach low temperatures.280,281”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSeveral mixed refrigerants have been developed with various precooling temperatures because the boiling point of the mixture depends on the composition.
“Several mixed refrigerants have been developed with various precooling temperatures because the boiling point of the mixture depends on the composition.80,184”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe LH2 cost rate and total exergy efficiency based on the Claude cycle were calculated to be 7.03 $/kg and 70.52%, respectively.
“Also, the LH2 cost rate and total exergy efficiency based on the Claude cycle were calculated to be 7.03 $/kg and 70.52%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [323] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe system purity and SEC were 99.99% and 18.01-41.2 kWh/kmol, respectively.
“The outcomes demonstrated that the system purity and SEC were 99.99% and 18.01–41.2 kWh/kmol, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [157] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccording to the DOE, the reported cost of electricity is 42.68 $/MWh, and the costs of production, terminal, trucking, liquefaction, station, and levelized cost for liquid H2 supply chain (27 TPD) are 2.24, 0.39, 0.68, 2.75, 8.18, and 14.24 $/kgH2, respectively.
“According to the DOE,366 the reported cost of electricity is 42.68 $/MWh, and the costs of production, terminal, trucking, liquefaction, station, and levelized cost for liquid H2 supply chain (27 TPD) are 2.24, 0.39, 0.68, 2.75, 8.18, and 14.24 $/kgH2, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [366] Connelly E., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThermal systems in operating conditions are being updated in order to conserve the SEC, decrease total expenses, and boost up structural capacity.
“Thermal systems in operating conditions are being updated in order to conserve the SEC, decrease total expenses, and boost up structural capacity.303”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [303] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPinch technology is introduced as a powerful and effective tool for thermodynamic analysis of process industries and optimization of heat exchanger networks.
“Pinch technology is introduced as a powerful and effective tool for thermodynamic analysis of process industries and optimization of heat exchanger networks.302”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [302] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMinor changes in equipment can be used based on optimization methods to further decrease the H2 liquefaction cost and improve the factory capacity.
“Minor changes in equipment can be used based on optimization methods to further decrease the H2 liquefaction cost and improve the factory capacity.102”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe LH2 cost rate and total exergy efficiency based on the inverse Brayton cycle were calculated to be 7.03 $/kg and 61.73%, respectively.
“The LH2 cost rate and total exergy efficiency based on the inverse Brayton cycle were calculated to be 7.03 $/kg and 61.73%, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [323] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe dwindling subsurface resources and ramping up pollution are the two main concerns of governments for future generations.
“The dwindling subsurface resources and ramping up pollution are the two main concerns of governments for future generations.316”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [316] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe H2 production and storage processes can be integrated with nuclear power plants, renewable heat sources, and waste heat from industries.
“The H2 production and storage processes can be integrated with nuclear power plants,335−340 renewable heat sources,341−348 and waste heat from industries (i.e., chemical plants, furnaces, and incinerators).349−355”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe SEC, COP, and total exergy yield were obtained to be 5.462 kWh/kgLH2, 0.1384, and 58.73%.
“The SEC, COP, and total exergy yield were obtained to be 5.462 kWh/kgLH2, 0.1384, and 58.73%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [175] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationRenewable energy sources, such as geothermal, solar, wind, biomass, and tidal, can reduce energy and environmental concerns because they are compatible with the environment and available.
“Renewable energy sources, such as geothermal, solar, wind, biomass, and tidal, can reduce energy and environmental concerns because they are compatible with the environment and available.317”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [317] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFuzzy Bellman-Zadeh, LINMAP, and TOPSIS methods were employed to make decisions in multiobjective optimization.
“Then, fuzzy Bellman–Zadeh, LINMAP, and TOPSIS methods were employed to make decisions in multiobjective optimization.179”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [179] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe precooling process can be substituted by using inexpensive LN2 that comes directly from the air separation system to generate liquid oxygen.
“Besides, the precooling process can be substituted by using inexpensive LN2 that comes directly from the air separation system to generate liquid oxygen.102”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLinnhoff and Tjoe introduced the first systematic method for modifying and optimizing the thermal systems.
“Linnhoff and Tjoe304 introduced the first systematic method for modifying and optimizing the thermal systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [304] Tjoe T. N., 1986, Chem. Eng.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationH2 is a clean fuel that can support stationary and mobile applications.
“H2 is a clean fuel that can support stationary and mobile applications.320,321”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe amount of H2 demanded to meet existing climate commitments by governments and to reach net-zero carbon emission goals is predicted to be 200 and 621 million tonnes in 2030 and 2060, respectively.
“The amount of H2 demanded to meet existing climate commitments by governments and to reach net-zero carbon emission goals is predicted to be 200 and 621 million tonnes in 2030 and 2060, respectively.25”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Global Hydrogen Review, International Energy Agency 2021, https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/5bd46d7b-906a-4429-abda-e9c507a62341/GlobalHydrogenReview2021.pdf (Accessed Jan 2023).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIntroducing a suitable initial guess in the first stage and reducing the examination of all possible modes in optimizing the developed system were the main advantages of the developed method.
“Introducing a suitable initial guess in the first stage and reducing the examination of all possible modes in optimizing the developed system were the main advantages of the developed method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [311] Smith R., 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSome integrated structures were developed for H2 purification, but no solutions were provided for its storage.
“Also, some integrated structures were developed for H2 purification, but no solutions were provided for its storage.246,334”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe exergy efficiency, liquid H2 rate, and LCOH were calculated to be 23.34%, 154.95 kg/h, and 1.827 $/kg, respectively.
“The exergy efficiency, liquid H2 rate, and LCOH were calculated to be 23.34%, 154.95 kg/h, and 1.827 $/kg, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [298] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe exergy yield of the hybrid system was reported to be 13-66.5%.
“The exergy yield of the hybrid system was reported to be 13–66.5%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [358] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBy combining the NLP/PSO method and the CPEA perspectives, Mafi et al. introduced the optimal arrangement of the refrigeration cycle.
“By combining the NLP/PSO method and the CPEA perspectives, they introduced the optimal arrangement of the refrigeration cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCogeneration systems provide a clear potential path for clean energy supply chains due to their high efficiency and low energy waste.
“Cogeneration systems provide a clear potential path for clean energy supply chains due to their high efficiency and low energy waste.330”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [330] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCompressors can be eliminated from H2 production and liquefaction plants, lowering the production costs and SEC.
“Compressors can be eliminated from H2 production and liquefaction plants, lowering the production costs and SEC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHigh-temperature geothermal wells located in North America include KS-13 at 1050 °C (Hawaii, United States), Wilson No. 1 at 400 °C (California, United States), H-8,11,12,26,27,29 at >380 °C (Los Humeros, Mexico), Prati-32 at 400 °C (Geysers, California, United States), and IID-14 at 400 °C (Imperial Valley, California, United States).
“High-temperature geothermal wells located in North America include KS-13 at 1050 °C (Hawaii, United States),406 Wilson No. 1 at 400 °C (California, United States),407 H-8,11,12,26,27,29 at >380 °C (Los Humeros, Mexico),408 Prati-32 at 400 °C (Geysers, California, United States),409 and IID-14 at 400 °C (Imperial Valley, California, United States).410”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationH2 liquefaction costs for 100 TPD can be decreased by about 50% and 67% compared to conventional 25 and 5 TPD liquefier systems, respectively.
“The results indicate that H2 liquefaction costs for 100 TPD can be decreased by about 50% and 67% compared to conventional 25 and 5 TPD liquefier systems, respectively.93”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [93] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFour additional H2 liquefaction factories have been recently announced to aid the growing H2 market.
“Four additional H2 liquefaction factories have been recently announced to aid the growing H2 market.377”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [377] Elgowainy, A.; Frank, E. Opportunities and Challenges of Liquid Hydrogen Supply Chain. Presentation at the Liquid Hydrogen Technologies Workshop; https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/Liquid%20H2%20Workshop-ANL.pdf (Accessed May 2022).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe environmental investigation of a liquid H2 production system integrated with an ACC, a LAC recovery, and an ORC plant demonstrated that the CO2 emission and its total specific were 96372 TPD and 2.641 kgCO2/kgLH2, respectively.
“The environmental investigation of a liquid H2 production system integrated with an ACC, a LAC recovery, and an ORC plant demonstrated that the CO2 emission and its total specific were reported to be 96372 TPD and 2.641 kgCO2/kgLH2, respectively.26”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe SEC and exergy yield in industrial applications are 12.5-15 kWh/kgLH2 and 19.3-23.1%, respectively, such as Praxair (United States) and Linde (Germany).
“The SEC and exergy yield in industrial applications are 12.5–15 kWh/kgLH2 and 19.3–23.1%, respectively, such as Praxair (United States) and Linde (Germany).58”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenHigh-temperature wells can be used to produce and store hydrogen.
“High-temperature wells can be used to produce and store hydrogen.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLiquid H2 storage systems face problems, including a high SEC, low exergy efficiency, high cost, and boil-off gas losses.
“Liquid H2 storage systems face problems, including a high SEC, low exergy efficiency, high cost, and boil-off gas losses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn cycles in which the LNG regasification process replaces mixed refrigerant cycles, the whole configuration exergy yield and the refrigeration cycle COP decrease.
“In the cycles in which the LNG regasification process replaces mixed refrigerant cycles, the whole configuration exergy yield and the refrigeration cycle COP decrease.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhen a second reactor is added, the SEC decreases and then decreases gradually with each reactor added.
“When a second reactor is added, the SEC decreases and then decreases gradually with each reactor added.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenLiquefaction of H2 leads to a decrease in volume and an increase in density compared to the gaseous state.
“Liquefaction of H2 leads to a decrease in volume and an increase in density compared to the gaseous state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOptimization choices include refrigerant mixture, pinch point, and high/low pressure of the refrigeration cycle.
“Optimization choices include refrigerant mixture, pinch point, and high/low pressure of the refrigeration cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe design of H2 liquefaction cycles along with industrial H2 production units at high pressure can lead to the elimination of compressors, reducing the production costs and SEC.
“The design of H2 liquefaction cycles along with industrial H2 production units at high pressure can lead to the elimination of compressors, reducing the production costs and SEC.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBecause the degree of freedom of the precooling cycle is greater than that of the cryogenic cycle, optimization methods prioritize the precooling cycles.
“Because the degree of freedom of the precooling cycle is greater than that of the cryogenic cycle, optimization methods prioritize the precooling cycles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenLeakage in a section of the cycle alters the percentage of refrigerants, which is difficult to manage.
“Moreover, leakage in a section of the cycle alters the percentage of refrigerants, which is difficult to manage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningH2 liquefaction is promising as a physical storage method for large-scale transportation and long-term storage.
“H2 liquefaction is promising as a physical storage method for large-scale transportation and long-term storage.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe design of large-scale liquid hydrogen storage tanks with capacities of 40 000 to 100 000 m3 for onshore or offshore applications is underway with the DOE budget.
“The design of large-scale liquid hydrogen storage tanks with capacities of 40 000 to 100 000 m3 for onshore or offshore applications is underway with the DOE budget.416”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [416] Liquid Hydrogen Technologies Workshop, Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office, https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/liquid-hydrogen-technologies-workshop. Accessed on: Jan 2023.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenNumerous researchers have paid attention to reducing the SEC in H2 liquefaction systems, while the total price, relative complexity, and emission levels have been ignored.
“Numerous researchers have paid attention to reducing the value of the SEC in H2 liquefaction systems, while the total price, relative complexity, and emission levels have been ignored.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe payback period, the levelized cost of H2, and the CO2 emissions were reported to be 8.40 years, 4.5 $/kg LH2, and 2441 TPD, respectively.
“The payback period, the levelized cost of H2, and the CO2 emissions were reported to be 8.40 years, 4.5 $/kg LH2, and 2441 TPD, respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTwo-objective optimization was investigated to reduce the CO2 emissions and payback period in a liquid H2 production structure.
“Two-objective optimization was investigated to reduce the CO2 emissions and payback period in a liquid H2 production structure.82”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [82] source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhen the ACC replaces the mixed refrigerant cycles, the overall configuration exergy yield and refrigeration cycle COP are reduced.
“When the ACC replaces the mixed refrigerant cycles, the overall configuration exergy yield and refrigeration cycle COP are reduced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationLiquefaction plants with higher production rates, higher efficiency, lower SEC (up to 40% reduction), and lower capital costs are needed to make liquid H2 cost effective for the H2 market.
“Liquefaction plants with higher production rates, higher efficiency, lower SEC (up to 40% reduction), and lower capital costs are needed to make liquid H2 cost effective for the H2 market.28,404”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe design of LH2 liquefaction cycles of 100 TPD with MRC precooling has the highest exergy efficiency and the lowest liquefaction costs compared to other cycles.
“Also, the results indicated that the design of LH2 liquefaction cycles of 100 TPD with MRC precooling has the highest exergy efficiency and the lowest liquefaction costs compared to other cycles.93”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [93] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe SEC and GHG emissions of the hydrogen liquefaction system for 5/33/130 TPD capacity were reported to be 11/9.4/8.2 kWh/kgLH2 and 4.8/4.1/3.6 kgCO2e/kgH2, respectively.
“The SEC and GHG emissions of the hydrogen liquefaction system for 5/33/130 TPD capacity were reported to be 11/9.4/8.2 kWh/kgLH2 and 4.8/4.1/3.6 kgCO2e/kgH2, respectively.377”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [377] Elgowainy, A.; Frank, E. Opportunities and Challenges of Liquid Hydrogen Supply Chain. Presentation at the Liquid Hydrogen Technologies Workshop; https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/Liquid%20H2%20Workshop-ANL.pdf (Accessed May 2022).
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe liquefaction plants' capacity can be improved to about 100 TPD or more to achieve the goals of lower specific liquefaction cost and SEC.
“Also, the liquefaction plants’ capacity can be improved to about 100 TPD or more to achieve these goals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA CB&I preliminary design and feasibility study for 40000 m3 storage space was completed.
“A CB&I preliminary design and feasibility study for 40000 m3 storage space was completed.416”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [416] Liquid Hydrogen Technologies Workshop, Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office, https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/liquid-hydrogen-technologies-workshop. Accessed on: Jan 2023.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationReuß et al. reported that H2 storage with the LOHC method had the highest CO2 emission (6.29 kgCO2/kgH2) and H2 storage with the liquefaction method had the lowest emission (0.52 kgCO2/kgH2).
“Reuß et al.371 reported that H2 storage with the LOHC method had the highest CO2 emission (6.29 kgCO2/kgH2) and H2 storage with the liquefaction method had the lowest emission (0.52 kgCO2/kgH2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [371] source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIn the reported liquefaction structures, the SEC, capital, and operating costs are reduced.
“In the reported liquefaction structures, the SEC, capital, and operating costs are reduced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe geothermal ACC for gas precooling significantly saves the power required for H2 liquefaction and is more beneficial than utilizing geothermal power output in a liquefaction process.
“The geothermal ACC for gas precooling significantly saves the power required for H2 liquefaction and is more beneficial than utilizing geothermal power output in a liquefaction process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenH2 liquefaction plants with higher production rates (>100 tonne/day), higher efficiency (>40%), lower SEC (<6 kWh/kgLH2), and lower investment costs (1-2 $/kgLH2) can be economical.
“The H2 liquefaction plants with higher production rates (>100 tonne/day), higher efficiency (>40%), lower SEC (<6 kWh/kgLH2), and lower investment costs (1–2 $/kgLH2) can be economical.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhen the number of ortho- to para-H2 conversion steps increases, the SEC of the H2 liquefaction process declines and the investment cost goes up.
“When the number of ortho- to para-H2 conversion steps increases, the SEC of the H2 liquefaction process declines and the investment cost goes up.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn the reported liquefaction structures, the capital and operating costs are reduced.
“In the reported liquefaction structures, the capital and operating costs are reduced.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAll previous research for LH2 has been based on much smaller tank sizes (<4700 m3) and evacuated insulation units.
“All previous research for LH2 has been based on much smaller tank sizes (<4700 m3) and evacuated insulation units.417”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [417] Fesmire J. E., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Linde factory in Germany, with an SEC of 13-15 kWh/kgLH2, is commonly used as a reference for large-scale industrial liquefaction processes.
“Furthermore, the Linde factory in Germany, with an SEC of 13–15 kWh/kgLH2, is commonly used as a reference for large-scale industrial liquefaction processes.77,405”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [77] source
- cites [405] Drnevich R., 2003
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Currently, the size of the largest H2 liquefaction system is 32 TPD.
“Currently, the size of the largest H2 liquefaction system is 32 TPD.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The SEC and H2 liquefaction price in current commercial liquefaction plants are 15–11.9 kWh/kgLH2 and 3–2.5 $/kgLH2, respectively.
“The SEC and H2 liquefaction price in the current commercial liquefaction plants are 15–11.9 kWh/kgLH2 and 3–2.5 $/kgLH2, respectively.”
The paper relies on this without support.
About 76% of the H2 generated globally is from SMR hydrocarbons.
“About 76% of the H2 generated globally is from SMR hydrocarbons.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Hydrogen is a clean and renewable fuel that can replace common fossil fuels.
“Hydrogen is a clean and renewable fuel that can replace common fossil fuels.”
The paper relies on this without support.
H2 storage requires a large volume and its transportation is difficult.
“H2 needs to be stored in liquid form because H2 storage requires a large volume and its transportation is difficult.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The cost of building H2 generation systems is significant, and it is often difficult to build them in the required area.
“Furthermore, the cost of building H2 generation systems is significant, and it is often difficult to build them in the required area.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Impurities in feed entering H2 liquefaction systems can freeze at low temperatures and cause blockage of exchangers.
“Impurities in feed entering H2 liquefaction systems can freeze at low temperatures and cause blockage of exchangers.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Riaz SEC reduction is reported as both 40% and 31.72%
MinorThe prose attributes a 40% SEC reduction to Riaz et al., whereas Table 5 reports a 31.72% relative energy saving for that study.
“Riaz et al.80 employed LNG cold recovery in the precooling stage to reduce the SEC in the H2 liquefaction system. This structural modification reduced the total amount of refrigerant by 50% and the SEC by 40%.”
“| Riaz et al.80 | 2021 | 11.19 | 28.64 | 31.72 | SEC of the modified case: 7.64 kWh/kgLH2 |”
Hydrogen molecule is assigned two molar masses
MinorThe prose gives a molar mass of 1.00794 g/mol for the H2 molecule, while Table 1 gives its molecular weight as 2.016 g/mol.
“The molecule of H2 is extremely small and light (120 pm van der Waals radius, and molar mass of 1.00794 g/mol)”
“| molecular weight134 | 2.016 | g/mol |”
Kim liquefaction cost appears as SEC in the supply-chain table
MinorTable 10 places 5.54 in its SEC column, measured in kWh/kgLH2, while the same row calls 5.54 the liquefaction cost in $/kgH2. Table 4 separately reports Kim et al.'s SEC as 9.477 kWh/kgLH2.
“| Kim et al.214 | 2022 | 5.54 | 1 | liquefaction cost: 5.54 $/kgH2 |”
“| Kim et al.214 | 2022 | 9.477 | 34 | 0.23 | NCR: 2, O-H2 to P-H2 (%): 75/25/0.5 |”
Noh case descriptions reverse which design uses mixed refrigerants
MinorThe prose describes the first Noh configuration as using LNG regasification alone and the second as combining it with mixed refrigerants. Table 6 assigns the combination to case I and LNG cold energy without the mixed-refrigerant precooling cycle to case II.
“To precool the H2 liquefaction system, the first structure alone employs the regasification process, while the second employs a combination of the regasification operation and mixed refrigerant systems.”
“| | | | | | in modified case I: LNG cold energy, two-stage MRC, and cryogenic J–B cycle | | | | | | | in modified case II: LNG cold energy and cryogenic J–B cycle |”
Yilmaz exergy efficiency differs between tables
MinorFor Yilmaz et al.72, Tables 6 and 7 report 78.3% exergy efficiency, while Table 8 reports 27.36%.
“| Yilmaz et al.72 | 2018 | 10.06 | 78.3 | 49.95 | SEC of base case: 20.1 kWh/kgLH2 |”
“| Yilmaz et al.72 | 2018 | 21 160 | 27.36 | geothermal | LN2 and Linde–Hampson cycle |”
Compressor cost is attributed to heat exchangers
MinorThe prose assigns 3.40 $/kgH2 to heat exchangers, but Table 10 assigns that amount to compressors and lists heat exchangers at 0.045 $/kgH2.
“The cost ($/kgH2) of heat exchangers (3.40), supplements (0.7), and electricity (0.57) accounted for most of the costs.”
“| | | | | cost ($/kgH2): compressor 3.40, expander 0.006, heat exchanger 0.045, supplement 0.7, electricity 0.57, labor 0.0105, maintenance 0.55, other 0.28 |”
Liquid storage is said to lower capacity despite its higher stated density
MinorThe statement that storing H2 as a liquid lowers storage capacity conflicts with the paper's density figures: liquid H2 is denser than the cited high-pressure gas, so it stores more H2 in the same volume.
“Storing H2 as a liquid instead of a gas lowers the storage capacity.”
“The densities of liquid H2 and high-pressure gas, are, respectively 70.8 and under 40 kg/m3.”
Cites
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Hermansah, H., Sandi, N., & Naspendra, Z. (2020) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/issn.1755-1315 · Cited by 12,775 · see citing works
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
(2022) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1231/1/011001 · Cited by 12,131 · see citing works
A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes
Nikolaidis, P., & Poullikkas, A. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.044 · Cited by 3,231 · see citing works
Materials for hydrogen storage
Züttel, A. (2003) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(03)00922-2 · Cited by 2,216 · see citing works
(2005) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 1,981 · see citing works
Hydrogen as an energy carrier: Prospects and challenges
Mazloomi, K., & Gomes, C. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.028 · Cited by 1,736 · see citing works
Hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engines
Verhelst, S., & Wallner, T. (2009) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2009.08.001 · Cited by 1,521 · see citing works
Potential importance of hydrogen as a future solution to environmental and transportation problems
Balat, M. (2008) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.05.047 · Cited by 1,420 · see citing works
Ammonia for hydrogen storage: challenges and opportunities
Klerke, A., Christensen, C. H., Nørskov, J. K., & Vegge, T. (2008) · Journal of Materials Chemistry · doi:10.1039/b720020j · Cited by 1,409 · see citing works
Moradi, R., & Groth, K. M. (2019) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.041 · Cited by 1,390 · see citing works
Large-scale storage of hydrogen
Andersson, J., & Grönkvist, S. (2019) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.063 · Cited by 1,356 · see citing works
Rusman, N. A. A., & Dahari, M. (2016) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.244 · Cited by 1,341 · see citing works
Hydrogen in energy transition: A review
Kovač, A., Paranos, M., & Marciuš, D. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.256 · Cited by 1,214 · see citing works
The metal-hydrogen system: basic bulk properties
Fukai, Y. (2005) · Springer Series in Materials Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-28883-x · Cited by 1,197
Hydrogen the fuel for 21st century
Jain, I. P. (2009) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.093 · Cited by 1,104 · see citing works
“Green” path from fossil-based to hydrogen economy: An overview of carbon-neutral technologies
MURADOV, N., & VEZIROGLU, T. (2008) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.08.054 · Cited by 980 · see citing works
Hydrogen - A sustainable energy carrier
Møller, K. T., Jensen, T. R., Akiba, E., & Li, H. (2017) · Progress in Natural Science Materials International · doi:10.1016/j.pnsc.2016.12.014 · Cited by 944 · see citing works
A review of absorption refrigeration technologies
Srikhirin, P., Aphornratana, S., & Chungpaibulpatana, S. (2001) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/s1364-0321(01)00003-x · Cited by 873 · see citing works
A review of available methods and development on energy storage; technology update
Mahlia, T. M. I., Saktisahdan, T. J., Jannifar, A., Hasan, M. H., & Matseelar, H. S. C. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.068 · Cited by 871 · see citing works
(2021) · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111311 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
A review on insulation materials for energy conservation in buildings
Aditya, L., Mahlia, T. M. I., Rismanchi, B., Ng, H.-K., Hasan, M. H., Metselaar, H. S. C., Muraza, O., & Aditiya, H. B. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.034 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
On hydrogen and hydrogen energy strategies
Midilli, A., Ay, M., Dincer, I., & Rosen, M. A. (2005) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2004.05.003 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Seasonal storage and alternative carriers: A flexible hydrogen supply chain model
Reuß, M., Grube, T., Robinius, M., Preuster, P., Wasserscheid, P., & Stolten, D. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.050 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
(2021) · doi:10.3390/en14185917 · Cited by 708 · see citing works
Progress and problems in hydrogen storage methods
Zhou, L. (2005) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2004.05.005 · Cited by 691 · see citing works
A review and comparative evaluation of thermochemical water splitting cycles for hydrogen production
Safari, F., & Dinçer, İ. (2019) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112182 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
Low-temperature ammonia decomposition catalysts for hydrogen generation
Mukherjee, S., Devaguptapu, S. V., Sviripa, A., Lund, C. R. F., & Wu, G. (2018) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.039 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
21st Century’s energy: Hydrogen energy system
Veziroğlu, T. N., & ̇n, S. Ş. (2008) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2007.08.015 · Cited by 665 · see citing works
Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carrier (LOHC)—Assessment based on chemical and economic properties
Niermann, M., Beckendorff, A., Kaltschmitt, M., & Bonhoff, K. (2019) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.199 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Determining the lowest-cost hydrogen delivery mode
YANG, C., & OGDEN, J. (2007) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.05.009 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Tashie-Lewis, B. C., & Nnabuife, S. G. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ceja.2021.100172 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Liquid hydrogen, methylcyclohexane, and ammonia as potential hydrogen storage: Comparison review
Wijayanta, A. T., Oda, T., Purnomo, C. W., Kashiwagi, T., & Aziz, M. (2019) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.112 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Al Ghafri, S. Z., Munro, S., Cardella, U., Funke, T., Notardonato, W., Trusler, J. P. M., Leachman, J., Span, R., Kamiya, S., Pearce, G., et al. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d2ee00099g · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Hydrogen safety: The road toward green technology
Najjar, Y. S. H. (2013) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.05.126 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Green hydrogen as an alternative fuel for the shipping industry
Atilhan, S., Park, S., El‐Halwagi, M. M., Atilhan, M., Moore, M., & Nielsen, R. B. (2021) · Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.coche.2020.100668 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Hydrogen storage: the remaining scientific and technological challenges
Felderhoff, M., Weidenthaler, C., von Helmolt, R., & Eberle, U. (2007) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b701563c · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Physical Adsorption: Forces and Phenomena
Bruch, L. W., Cole, M. W., & Zaremba, E. (1997) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198556381.001.0001 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Large-vscale hydrogen production and storage technologies: Current status and future directions
Olabi, A. G., bahri, A. S., Abdelghafar, A. A., Baroutaji, A., Sayed, E. T., Alami, A. H., Rezk, H., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.110 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Adsorption refrigeration—An efficient way to make good use of waste heat and solar energy☆
Wang, R. Z., & de Oliveira, R. G. (2006) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2006.01.002 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Hong, W. Y. (2022) · Carbon Capture Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ccst.2022.100044 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
H2 Production via Ammonia Decomposition Using Non-Noble Metal Catalysts: A Review
Bell, T., & Torrente‐Murciano, L. (2016) · Topics in Catalysis · doi:10.1007/s11244-016-0653-4 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Review of hydrogen safety during storage, transmission, and applications processes
Abohamzeh, E., Salehi, F., Sheikholeslami, M., Abbassi, R., & Khan, F. I. (2021) · Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries · doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2021.104569 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
LNG cold energy utilization: Prospects and challenges
He, T., Chong, Z. R., Zheng, J., Ju, Y., & Linga, P. (2018) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.170 · Cited by 433 · see citing works
(2018) · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.033 · Cited by 429 · see citing works
Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers and alternatives for international transport of renewable hydrogen
Niermann, M., Timmerberg, S., Drünert, S., & Kaltschmitt, M. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110171 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Ocko, I., Sun, T., Shindell, D. T., Oppenheimer, M., Hristov, A. N., Pacala, S. W., Mauzerall, D. L., Xu, Y., & Hamburg, S. P. (2021) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abf9c8 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Hydrogen Production Technologies Overview
El‐Shafie, M., Kambara, S., & Hayakawa, Y. (2019) · Journal of Power and Energy Engineering · doi:10.4236/jpee.2019.71007 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
(2009) · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.109 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
The Future of Hydrogen: Seizing today’s opportunities
International Energy Agency (2019) · doi:10.1787/1e0514c4-en · Cited by 328 · see citing works
The metal-hydrogen system : basic bulk properties
深井, 有. (2010) · Springer eBooks · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Hydrogen-storage materials for mobile applications
Schlapbach, L., & Züttel, A. (2010) · Co-Published with Macmillan Publishers Ltd, UK eBooks · doi:10.1142/9789814317665_0038 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Introducing and energy analysis of a novel cryogenic hydrogen liquefaction process configuration
Sadaghiani, M. S., & Mehrpooya, M. (2017) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.136 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Carapellucci, R., & Giordano, L. (2020) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228391 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Avargani, V. M., Zendehboudi, S., Saady, N. M. C., & Dusseault, M. B. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115927 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Self-citationHydrogen Clathrates: Next Generation Hydrogen Storage Materials
Gupta, A., Baron, G. V., Perreault, P., Lenaerts, S., Ciocarlan, R., Cool, P., Mileo, P. G. M., Rogge, S. M. J., Speybroeck, V. V., Watson, G., et al. (2021) · Energy storage materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2021.05.044 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
CO2 capture and storage: are we ready?
Orr, F. M. (2009) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/b822107n · Cited by 254 · see citing works
(2017) · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.167 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Societal lifecycle costs of cars with alternative fuels/engines
Ogden, J. M., Williams, R. H., & Larson, E. D. (2003) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(02)00246-x · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Hydrogen as a Long-Term Large-Scale Energy Storage Solution to Support Renewables
Kharel, S., & Shabani, B. (2018) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en11102825 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Recent Progress Using Solid-State Materials for Hydrogen Storage: A Short Review
Lee, S.-Y., Lee, J.-H., Kim, Y.-H., Kim, J.-W., Lee, K.-J., & Park, S.-J. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10020304 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Delvosalle, C., Fiévez, C., Pipart, A., & Debray, B. (2005) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.005 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Foumier, R. O. (1991) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/91gl00966 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
A novel hydrogen liquefaction process configuration with combined mixed refrigerant systems
Asadnia, M., & Mehrpooya, M. (2017) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.04.260 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
A review on hydrogen production thermochemical water-splitting cycles
Mehrpooya, M., & Habibi, R. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123836 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Azarpour, A., Mohammadzadeh, O., Rezaei, N., & Zendehboudi, S. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115945 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Self-citationA Review of Heat Transfer Issues in Hydrogen Storage Technologies
Zhang, J., Fisher, T. S., Ramachandran, P. V., Gore, J. P., & Mudawar, I. (2005) · Journal of Heat Transfer · doi:10.1115/1.2098875 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
(2017) · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.068 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Hydrogen Production from Nuclear Energy
Naterer, G. F., Dinçer, İ., & Zamfirescu, C. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4938-5 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Heuser, P.-M., Ryberg, D. S., Grube, T., Robinius, M., & Stolten, D. (2019) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.156 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Taipabu, M. I., Viswanathan, K., Wu, W., Hattu, N., & Atabani, A. E. (2022) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2022.06.006 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
(1998) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Peschka, W. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-9126-2 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
700 bar type IV high pressure hydrogen storage vessel burst – Simulation and experimental validation
Berro Ramirez, J. P., Halm, D., Grandidier, J.-C., Villalonga, S., & Nony, F. (2015) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.05.126 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Raab, M., Maier, S., & Dietrich, R. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.213 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Large-scale hydrogen liquefaction in Germany
BRACHA, M., LORENZ, G., PATZELT, A., & WANNER, M. (1994) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/0360-3199(94)90177-5 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Qi, M., Park, J., Kim, J., Lee, I., & Moon, I. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115049 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
He, T., Lv, H., Shao, Z., Zhang, J., Xing, X., & Ma, H. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115570 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Mehrenjani, J. R., Gharehghani, A., & Sangesaraki, A. G. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115266 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Mousavi, S. A., & Mehrpooya, M. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119005 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Aceves, S. M., Petitpas, G., Espinosa-Loza, F., Matthews, M. J., & Ledesma-Orozco, E. (2013) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.123 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Sustainability study of hydrogen pathways for fuel cell vehicle applications
Hwang, J.-J. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.033 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Review on the design and optimization of hydrogen liquefaction processes
Yin, L., & Ju, Y. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy · doi:10.1007/s11708-019-0657-4 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Hydrogen economy, energy, and liquid organic carriers for its mobility
Singh, R., Singh, M., & Gautam, S. (2021) · Materials Today: Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.065 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Liquid hydrogen: Potential, problems, and a proposed research program
SHERIF, S. (1997) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/s0360-3199(96)00201-7 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
A novel integrated structure for hydrogen purification using the cryogenic method
Aasadnia, M., Mehrpooya, M., & Ghorbani, B. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123872 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationOzbilen, A., Dinçer, İ., & Rosen, M. A. (2011) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.035 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Assessment and optimization of an integrated wind power system for hydrogen and methane production
Safari, F., & Dincer, I. (2018) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.09.071 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Reducing the exergy destruction in the cryogenic heat exchangers of hydrogen liquefaction processes
Wilhelmsen, Ø., Berstad, D., Aasen, A., Nekså, P., & Skaugen, G. (2018) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.094 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Mehrpooya, M., Ghorbani, B., & Hosseini, S. S. (2018) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.109 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Self-citationA novel hydrogen liquefaction process based on LNG cold energy and mixed refrigerant cycle
Faramarzi, S., Nainiyan, S. M. M., Mafi, M., & Ghasemiasl, R. (2021) · International Journal of Refrigeration · doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2021.07.022 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
A study of the efficiency of hydrogen liquefaction
Baker, C. (1978) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/0360-3199(78)90037-x · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Assessment of system variations for hydrogen transport by liquid organic hydrogen carriers
Wulf, C., & Zapp, P. (2018) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.198 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Ansarinasab, H., Mehrpooya, M., & Mohammadi, A. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.014 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Battery storage systems in electric power systems
Joseph, A., & Shahidehpour, M. (2006) · IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting · doi:10.1109/pes.2006.1709235 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Ansarinasab, H., Mehrpooya, M., & Sadeghzadeh, M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.090 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Industrial hydrogen production technology and development status in China: A review
Chai, S., Zhang, G., Li, G., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-021-02089-w · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Process optimization and analysis of a novel hydrogen liquefaction cycle
Yin, L., & Ju, Y. (2019) · International Journal of Refrigeration · doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2019.11.004 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Large-scale hydrogen liquefier utilising mixed-refrigerant pre-cooling
Berstad, D., Stang, J., & Nekså, P. (2010) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.02.001 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Combining pinch and exergy analysis for process modifications
Feng, X., & Zhu, X. X. (1997) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/s1359-4311(96)00035-x · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Ebrahimi, A., & Ziabasharhagh, M. (2017) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.145 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
An overview of conventional and non-conventional hydrogen production methods
Kumar, R., Kumar, A., & Pal, A. (2020) · Materials Today Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.793 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Proposal of an innovative, high-efficiency, large-scale hydrogen liquefier
Valenti, G., & Macchi, E. (2008) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.03.044 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Siddiqui, O., Ishaq, H., & Dinçer, İ. (2019) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111812 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Geothermal energy use in hydrogen production: A review
Ghazvini, M., Sadeghzadeh, M., Ahmadi, M. H., Moosavi, S., & Pourfayaz, F. (2019) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.4778 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Prospects of Renewable Bioprocessing in Future Energy Systems
(2019) · Biofuel and biorefinery technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14463-0 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Comparison of sulfur–iodine and copper–chlorine thermochemical hydrogen production cycles
Wang, Z. L., Naterer, G. F., Gabriel, K. S., Gravelsins, R. J., & Daggupati, V. N. (2010) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.09.006 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
(2017) · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.03.064 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Conceptual design of a high efficiency large capacity hydrogen liquefier
Quack, H. (2002) · AIP Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.1472029 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Hydrogen liquefaction and liquid hydrogen storage
Valenti, G. (2016) · Compendium of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/b978-1-78242-362-1.00002-x · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Optimal operation of a large-scale liquid hydrogen plant utilizing mixed fluid refrigeration system
Krasae-in, S. (2014) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.046 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Krasae-in, S., Stang, J. H., & Neksa, P. (2010) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.062 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Performance and optimization of hydrogen liquefaction cycles
NANDI, T., & SARANGI, S. (1993) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/0360-3199(93)90199-k · Cited by 115 · see citing works
The Northwest Geysers EGS Demonstration Project, California
García, J., Hartline, C. S., Walters, M., Wright, M., Rutqvist, J., Dobson, P. F., & Jeanne, P. (2015) · Geothermics · doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.08.003 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Analysis of a clean hydrogen liquefaction plant integrated with a geothermal system
Seyam, S., Dinçer, İ., & Agelin‐Chaab, M. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118562 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Bian, J., Yang, J. G., Li, Y., Chen, Z., Liang, F., & Cao, X. (2021) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114904 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Deng, L., & Adams II, T. A. (2020) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112315 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Riaz, A., Qyyum, M. A., Min, S., Lee, S., & Lee, M. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117471 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Analysis and assessment of an advanced hydrogen liquefaction system
Hammad, A., & Dinçer, İ. (2017) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.158 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Yang, J.-H., Yoon, Y., Ryu, M., An, S.-K., Shin, J., & Lee, C.-J. (2019) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113840 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Geothermal energy use in absorption precooling for Claude hydrogen liquefaction cycle
Kanoglu, M., Yilmaz, C., & Abusoglu, A. (2016) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.068 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Ghorbani, B., Shirmohammadi, R., & Mehrpooya, M. (2017) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.12.099 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Self-citationComparative risk assessment of liquefied and gaseous hydrogen refueling stations
Yoo, B.-H., Wilailak, S., Bae, S.-H., Gye, H.-R., & Lee, C. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.073 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Economics of hydrogen production and liquefaction by geothermal energy
Yılmaz, C., Kanoğlu, M., Bolattürk, A., & Gadalla, M. A. E. (2011) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.06.037 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Han, W., Sun, L., Zheng, D., Jin, H., Ma, S., & Jing, X. (2013) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.01.067 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Hydrogen liquefaction process using solar energy and organic Rankine cycle power system
Ghorbani, B., Mehrpooya, M., Aasadnia, M., & Niasar, M. S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.227 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationMousavi, S. A., Mehrpooya, M., & Delpisheh, M. (2022) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2022.01.067 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Quantitative risk assessment using a Japanese hydrogen refueling station model
Suzuki, T., Shiota, K., Izato, Y.-I., Komori, M., Sato, K., Takai, Y., Ninomiya, T., & Miyake, A. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.035 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Mechanism of nuclear spin initiated para-H2 to ortho-H2 conversion
Buntkowsky, G., Walaszek, B., Adamczyk, A., Xu, Y., Limbach, H.-H., & Chaudret, B. (2006) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b601594h · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Flame-retardant porous hexagonal boron nitride for safe and effective radioactive iodine capture
Wang, J., Ai, K., & Lu, L. (2019) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c9ta04489b · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Aasadnia, M., & Mehrpooya, M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.001 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Development and assessment of a solar, wind and hydrogen hybrid trigeneration system
Ishaq, H., Dinçer, İ., & Naterer, G. F. (2018) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.172 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Qyyum, M. A., Riaz, A., Naquash, A., Haider, J., Qadeer, K., Nawaz, A., Lee, H.-H., & Lee, M. (2021) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114659 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Langmi, H. W., Engelbrecht, N., Modisha, P. M., & Bessarabov, D. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819424-9.00006-9 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Zhuzhgov, A. V., Krivoruchko, O. P., Исупова, Л. А., Martyanov, O. N., & Parmon, V. N. (2018) · Catalysis in Industry · doi:10.1134/s2070050418010117 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Data requirements for improving the Quantitative Risk Assessment of liquid hydrogen storage systems
Correa-Jullian, C., & Groth, K. M. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.266 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Ghorbani, B., Hamedi, M.-H., Amidpour, M., & Shirmohammadi, R. (2017) · International Journal of Refrigeration · doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2017.02.030 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citation(2022) · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114947 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
International Conference of Applied Energy 2015
Mamat, A. M. I., Martinez-Botas, R., Chiong, M. C., Rajoo, S., Petrovic, S., & Romagnoli, A. (2015) · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Teng, J., Wang, K., Zhu, S., Bao, S., Zhi, X., Zhang, X., & Qiu, L. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.127016 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
An overview and critical assessment of thermochemical hydrogen production methods
Karaca, A. E., Qureshy, A. M. M. I., & Dinçer, İ. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135706 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Bae, J.-E., Wilailak, S., Yang, J.-H., Yun, D.-Y., Zahid, U., & Lee, C.-J. (2021) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113835 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Geothermal energy use in hydrogen liquefaction
KANOGLU, M., DINCER, I., & ROSEN, M. (2007) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.06.006 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Rosen, M. A., Naterer, G. F., Chukwu, C. C., Sadhankar, R., & Suppiah, S. (2012) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.1702 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Gong, M. Q., Wu, J. F., & Luo, E. G. (2004) · Cryogenics · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2004.05.004 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Yüksel, Y. E., Öztürk, M., & Dinçer, İ. (2019) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.263 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Ansarinasab, H., & Mehrpooya, M. (2016) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.12.003 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Renewable energy resources and workforce case study Saudi Arabia: review and recommendations
Barhoumi, E. M., Okonkwo, P. C., Zghaibeh, M., Belgacem, I. B., Alkanhal, T. A., Abo-Khalil, A. G., & Tlili, I. (2020) · Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry · doi:10.1007/s10973-019-09189-2 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Mehrpooya, M., Omidi, M., & Vatani, A. (2016) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.12.032 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
(2010) · doi:10.1002/9783527629800.ch1 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Al‐Zareer, M., Dinçer, İ., & Rosen, M. A. (2016) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.004 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Lowesmith, B. J., Hankinson, G., & Chynoweth, S. (2014) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.08.002 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Economically viable large-scale hydrogen liquefaction
Cardella, U., Decker, L., & Klein, H. (2017) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/171/1/012013 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Accident modelling and safety measure design of a hydrogen station
Al-shanini, A., Ahmad, A., & Khan, F. T. (2014) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.05.044 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Li, X. J., Allen, J. D., Stager, J. A., & Ku, A. Y. (2020) · Clean Energy · doi:10.1093/ce/zkz033 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
(2022) · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.012 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Karimi, M., Mehrpooya, M., & pourfayaz, F. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130001 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Wissenschaftliche zeitschrift der technischen universität, Dresden
Crossley, F. R. E. (1979) · Mechanism and Machine Theory · doi:10.1016/0094-114x(79)90046-6 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Progress in thermochemical hydrogen production with the copper–chlorine cycle
Naterer, G. F., Suppiah, S., Stolberg, L., Lewis, M. A., Wang, Z., Rosen, M. A., Dinçer, İ., Gabriel, K. S., Odukoya, A., Secnik, E., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.02.124 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Process development and exergy cost sensitivity analysis of a novel hydrogen liquefaction process
Sadaghiani, M. S., Mehrpooya, M., & Ansarinasab, H. (2017) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.124 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Design and performance analysis of a hydrogen liquefaction process
Zhang, S., & Liu, G. (2022) · Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy · doi:10.1007/s10098-021-02078-z · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Yang, J. G., Li, Y., Tan, H., Bian, J., & Cao, X. (2022) · Journal of Energy Storage · doi:10.1016/j.est.2022.106490 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Exergy analysis of multistage cascade low temperature refrigeration systems used in olefin plants
Mafi, M., Naeynian, S. M. M., & Amidpour, M. (2009) · International Journal of Refrigeration · doi:10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2008.05.008 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Cho, S., Park, J., Noh, W., Lee, I., & Moon, I. (2021) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.6751 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Naquash, A., Qyyum, M. A., Islam, M., Sial, N. R., Min, S., Lee, S., & Lee, M. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.115200 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Yilmaz, C. (2018) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.063 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Mehrpooya, M., Mousavi, S. A., Asadnia, M., Zaitsev, A., & Sanavbarov, R. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128271 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Taghavi, M., Salarian, H., & Ghorbani, B. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128821 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Self-citationLou, Y., Ye, Y., Yang, Y., & Zuo, W. (2021) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108683 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Behzadi, A., Gholamian, E., Alirahmi, S. M., Nourozi, B., & Sadrizadeh, S. (2022) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115878 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
(2022) · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.202 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Geng, J., & Sun, H. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2022.125410 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Ghorbani, B., Zendehboudi, S., & Afrouzi, Z. A. (2023) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116506 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationOzbilen, A., Dincer, I., & Rosen, M. A. (2011) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.067 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
On the design of environmentally benign refrigerant mixtures: a mathematical programming approach
Duvedi, A. P., & Achenie, L. E. K. (1997) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0098-1354(96)00310-9 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
A study on the Fe–Cl thermochemical water splitting cycle for hydrogen production
Safari, F., & Dinçer, İ. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.208 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
International Conference on Hydrogen Safety
LEBBAL, M. E., & Lecoeuche, S. (2007) · HAL · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Táboas, F., Bourouis, M., & Vallès, M. (2014) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.02.065 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Ghorbani, B., Zendehboudi, S., & Moradi, M. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119653 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationLee, D., Quarme Gbadago, D., Jo, Y., Hwang, G., Jo, Y., Smith, R., & Hwang, S. (2021) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114620 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Electricity and hydrogen as energy vectors for transportation vehicles
Sheffield, J., Martin, K. B., & Folkson, R. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1533/9780857097422.1.117 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Power-to-liquid hydrogen: Exergy-based evaluation of a large-scale system
Incer-Valverde, J., Gerhardt-Mörsdorf, J., Morosuk, T., & Tsatsaronis, G. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.026 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Ortho-para catalysis in liquid-hydrogen production
Weitzel, D. H., Loebenstein, W. V., Draper, J. W., & Park, O. E. (1958) · Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards · doi:10.6028/jres.060.026 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
(2020) · doi:10.1016/j.cryogenics.2020.103093 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Optimization of hydrogen liquefaction process based on parallel genetic algorithm
Zhu, J., Wang, G., Li, Y., Duo, Z., & Sun, C. (2022) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.062 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Yüksel, Y. E., Öztürk, M., & Dinçer, İ. (2018) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.01.088 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Ishaq, H., Dinçer, İ., & Naterer, G. F. (2018) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.07.019 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Aasadnia, M., Mehrpooya, M., & Ansarinasab, H. (2019) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113798 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Lee, H., Haider, J., Qyyum, M. A., Choe, C., & Lim, H. (2022) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123964 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Algal bioenergy production and utilization: Technologies, challenges, and prospects
Tazikeh, S., Zendehboudi, S., Ghafoori, S., Lohi, A., & Mahinpey, N. (2022) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2022.107863 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citationEnergy and exergy analysis of a hydrogen-fueled HCCI engine
Namar, M. M., & Jahanian, O. (2019) · Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry · doi:10.1007/s10973-018-7910-7 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Staine, F., & Favrat, D. (1996) · Applied Thermal Engineering · doi:10.1016/1359-4311(95)00036-4 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Ebrahimi, A., Ghorbani, B., & Ziabasharhagh, M. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120548 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationNoh, W., Park, S., Kim, J., & Lee, I. (2022) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.8064 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Multi-effect absorption chillers
Ziegler, F., Kahn, R. A., Summerer, F., & Alefeld, G. (1993) · International Journal of Refrigeration · doi:10.1016/0140-7007(93)90002-p · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Yılmaz, F., Öztürk, M., & Selbaş, R. (2018) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.021 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Nouri, M., Miansari, M., & Ghorbani, B. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120862 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationEnergy efficient large-scale storage of liquid hydrogen
Fesmire, J., Swanger, A., Jacobson, J., & Notardonato, W. (2022) · IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1240/1/012088 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Ghorbani, B., Shirmohammadi, R., Mehrpooya, M., & Hamedi, M.-H. (2018) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.078 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationÖzcan, H., & Dinçer, İ. (2016) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.04.015 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Multi-sequence dome lay-up simulations for hydrogen hyper-bar composite pressure vessels
Leh, D., Saffré, P., Francescato, P., & Arrieux, R. (2013) · Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.05.007 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 61
- Carnegie R., 2013, State Utility Forecasting Group, 1
- Global Hydrogen Review 2021
- Nandapala K., 2018, Conference Sustainability for People─Envisaging Multi Disciplinary Solution, 91
- Verma S. C., 2015, Int. J. Econ. Plants, 2, 70
- Global Hydrogen Review, International Energy Agency 2021, https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/5bd46d7b-906a-4429-abda-e9c507a62341/GlobalHydrogenReview2021.pdf (Accessed Jan 2023).
- 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.05.244 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111311 · DOI
- Kuendig A., 2006, Proceedings of the 16th World Hydrogen Energy Conference, 3326
- Stang J., 2006, Proceedings of the 16th World Hydrogen Energy Conference
- 10.1142/9789814317665_0038 · DOI
- Priyanka D., 2022, Environment Conservation, Challenges Threats in Conservation of Biodiversity, 87
- Anderson P., 1972, J. Inst. Pet., 58, 83
- Timmerhaus K. D., 2013, Cryogenic process engineering
- 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2021.07.022 · DOI · Paper page
- Valenti G., 2016, Compendium of Hydrogen Energy, 27, 10.1016/B978-1-78242-362-1.00002-X · DOI · Paper page
- Jensen J., 1980, Brookhaven national laboratory selected cryogenic data notebook: sections I-IX
- Staats, W. L. Analysis of a supercritical hydrogen liquefaction cycle. S.M. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2008.
- Mafi, M. Development in mixed refrigerant cycles for separation systems of petrochemical industries and thermo-economical optimization through combined pinch and exergy analysis. Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khajeh Nasir Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, 2009.
- Walnum H. T., 2012, Refrig. Sci. Technol., 2012, 273
- 1980, Brookhaven National Laboratory Report BNL 10200-R
- Peschka W., 2012, Liquid hydrogen: fuel of the future
- Sham R., 2011, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol., 3, 601
- Ohlig K., 2014, AIP Conference Proceedings, 1573, 1311
- Mukhopadhyay M., 2010, Fundamentals of cryogenic engineering
- Quack H., 2012, 12th cryogenic-IIR Conference
- Lee, G.C. Optimal Design and Anaylysis of Refrigeration Systems For Low Temperature Processes. Thesis Dissertation, The University of Manchester, 2001.
- Mafi M., 2013, Sci. Iran., 20, 1254
- Kleemenko A. P., 1959, Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Refrigeration, 1, 34
- Krasae-in, S. Efficient hydrogen liquefaction processes. Doctoral Thesis, NTNU, 2013.
- State of the Art Hydrogen Liquefaction, DOE Workshop 2022, Air Liquide Engineering & Construction, https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/Liquid%20H2%20Workshop-Air%20Liquide.pdf (Accessed May 2022).
- Gross R., 1994, Linde Ber. Tech. Wiss., 71, 36
- Weindorf W., 2003, LB-Systemtechnik GmbH, Ottobrunn
- Shimko M., 2008, FY 2008 Annual Progress Report, DOE Hydrogen Program
- 2019, International Energy Agency report
- Brant B., 1998, Oil Gas J., 96
- 10.1007/s11696-022-02294-x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.190 · DOI · Paper page
- Riaz A., 2021, International Conference on Applied Energy
- Barber N., 1957, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 35, 77
- Lamb R., 1996, ICHEME Research Event, 223
- 10.22108/GPJ.2021.126527.1097 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.est.2022.104722 · DOI
- Tjoe T. N., 1986, Chem. Eng., 93, 47
- Smith R., 2000, AIChE Spring Meeting
- 10.1016/j.psep.2023.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 2008, H2A hydrogen delivery infrastructure analysis models and conventional pathway options analysis results
- Connelly E., 2019, DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record, 1
- Reddi K., 2015, Hydrogen delivery scenario analysis model
- 2016, The fuel cell technologies office multi-year research, development, and demonstration plan
- Burgunder A., 2019, DOE Hydrogen and Fuel Cells Program Record
- Cihlar J., 2021, Hydrogen generation in Europe: Overview of costs and key benefits
- Kampitsch M., 2016, Presentation at the 21st world hydrogen energy conference
- Elgowainy, A.; Frank, E. Opportunities and Challenges of Liquid Hydrogen Supply Chain. Presentation at the Liquid Hydrogen Technologies Workshop; https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-03/Liquid%20H2%20Workshop-ANL.pdf (Accessed May 2022).
- Drnevich R., 2003, Strategic initiatives for hydrogen delivery workshop
- Teplow W., 2009, GRC Trans., 33, 989
- Kaspereit D., 2016, GRC Trans., 40, 57
- Al-Hamed, K. H. Modeling and experimental investigation of renewable energy and ammonia-based systems for carbon capturing and useful outputs. Thesis; University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2022.
- Rezaie H., 2016, International Conference on Engineering Applied Sciences
- Howe G., 2021, Adv. Hydrogen Technol. (H2Tech), 1, 18
- Liquid Hydrogen Technologies Workshop, Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office, https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/liquid-hydrogen-technologies-workshop. Accessed on: Jan 2023.
- Fesmire J. E., 2021, DOE/NASA Advances in Liquid Hydrogen Storage Workshop
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Ghorbani, B., Zendehboudi, S., Saady, N. M. C., Duan, X., & Albayati, T. M.
- Affiliations
- Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
- University of Technology - Iraq (IQ)
- Corresponding author
- Zendehboudi, Sohrab
- Venue
- ACS Omega
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-05-18
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 18358-18399
- ISSN
- 2470-1343 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10233851
- OpenAlex
- W4377103132
- Semantic Scholar
- 4a43b733e9b55a498229709cf798ee7a418b3c71
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 343
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Omega (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Memorial University of Newfoundland
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Mitacs
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
- Keywords
- hydrogen storage, hydrogen liquefaction, specific energy consumption, cryogenic storage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-30.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-30.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review