The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sample Size Estimation in Clinical Research
Abstract
Sample size determination is an essential step in planning a clinical study. It is critical to understand that different study designs need different methods of sample size estimation. Although there is a vast literature discussing sample size estimation, incorrect or improper formulas continue to be applied. This article reviews basic statistical concepts in sample size estimation, discusses statistical considerations in the choice of a sample size for randomized controlled trials and observational studies, and provides strategies for reducing sample size when planning a study. To assist clinical researchers in performing sample size calculations, we have developed an online calculator for common clinical study designs. The calculator is available at http://riskcalc.org:3838/samplesize/. Finally, we offer our recommendations on reporting sample size determination in clinical studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This limits interpretation of the mixed findings reported across all of the trial outcomes (Wang & Ji, 2020).”
From A Systematic Review of Third-Wave Therapies to Reduce Distress and Improve Wellbeing and Quality of Life in People with Parkinson's Disease. (2025) · cites this paper as Wang & Ji, 2020
Citations
Cites
von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., Vandenbroucke, J. P., & Initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296 · Cited by 23,020
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
the CONSORT Group, Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-18 · Cited by 13,371
Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs
Concato, J., Shah, N., & Horwitz, R. I. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200006223422507 · Cited by 3,563
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Wittes, 2002, Sample size calculations for randomized controlled trials, Epidemiol Rev, 24, 39, 10.1093/epirev/24.1.39 · DOI
- Eng, 2003, Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied?, Radiology, 227, 309, 10.1148/radiol.2272012051 · DOI
- Kasiulevičius, 2006, Sample size calculation in epidemiological studies, Gerontologija, 7, 225
- Sakpal, 2010, Sample size estimation in clinical trial, Perspect Clin Res, 1, 67, 10.4103/2229-3485.71856 · DOI
- Noordzij, 2010, Sample size calculations: basic principles and common pitfalls, Nephrol Dial Transplant, 25, 1388, 10.1093/ndt/gfp732 · DOI
- Grimes, 2002, An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land, Lancet, 359, 57, 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07283-5 · DOI · Paper page
- Gagnier, 2014, The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development, J Clin Epidemiol, 67, 46, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.003 · DOI
- Hopewell, 2010, The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed, BMJ, 340, c723, 10.1136/bmj.c723 · DOI · Paper page
- Lipsitz, 1995, Sample size calculations for non-randomized studies, J R Stat Soc Ser D Stat, 44, 81
- Bernardo, 2000, Sample size calculations for failure time random variables in non-randomized studies, J R Stat Soc Ser D Stat, 49, 31
- Lesaffre, 2008, Superiority, equivalence, and non-inferiority trials, Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis, 66, 150
- Browner, 2007, Estimating sample size and power: applications and examples, Designing Clin Res, 3, 367
- Henry GT. Practical Sampling. vol 21. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 1990.
- Collins, 2015, Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement, Ann Intern Med, 162, 55, 10.7326/M14-0697 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020) · CHEST · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012 · Cited by 2,214
Self-citationLánczky, A., & Győrffy, B. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/27633 · Cited by 1,694
“A few representative examples used in these tools in medical research include an online calculator for receiver operator characteristics [3], a tool to determine optimal cut-off values for clinical tests [4], and a sample size calculator for randomized clinical trials [5].”
Sample size determination: A practical guide for health researchers
Althubaiti, A. (2022) · Journal of general and family medicine · doi:10.1002/jgf2.600 · Cited by 437
Cross-sectional research: A critical perspective, use cases, and recommendations for IS research
Maier, C., Thatcher, J. B., Grover, V., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102625 · Cited by 502
Wang, X., & Kattan, M. W. (2020) · CHEST Journal · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.014 · Cited by 190
Self-citationEl-Sheikh, N. M., Abulsoud, A. I., Fawzy, A., Wasfey, E. F., & Hamdy, N. Μ. (2023) · Pathology - Research and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.prp.2023.154570 · Cited by 62
Variational Autoencoders for Data Augmentation in Clinical Studies
Papadopoulos, D., & Karalis, V. D. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13158793 · Cited by 67
Ding, H., Simmich, J., Vaezipour, A., Andrews, N. E., & Russell, T. G. (2023) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad222 · Cited by 63
Li, J., Huang, Q., Sun, S., Zhou, K., Wang, X., Pan, K., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Han, Q., Si, C., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-78938-7 · Cited by 52
Self-citationSampling Methods and Sample Size Determination in Clinical Research: An Educational Review
Zrineh, A., Al‐Usta, M., & Alwawi, A. A. (2026) · Journal of General and Family Medicine · doi:10.1002/jgf2.70096 · Cited by 47
Suprapti, B., Izzah, Z., Anjani, A., Andarsari, M. R., Nilamsari, W., & Nugroho, C. W. (2023) · Global Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100113 · Cited by 36
“The sample size was calculated based on a single population proportion formula [9] by considering the proportion 60% with a 95% confidence interval and a 5% margin of error, thus the sample size was 369.”
MethodEvidence-Based Respiratory Care
HESS, D. R. (2021) · Respiratory Care · doi:10.4187/respcare.08950 · Cited by 39
“55 The sample size estimate is determined by the desired difference between groups and the expected variability.”
Chen, X., Zhang, H., Guo, D., Yang, S., Liu, B., Hao, Y., Liu, Q., Zhang, T., Meng, F., Sun, L., et al. (2024) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102969 · Cited by 31
Stuck, A. K., Mäder, N. C., Bertschi, D., Limacher, A., & Kressig, R. W. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18073498 · Cited by 33
Early Versus Usual Palliative Care Consultation in the Intensive Care Unit
Helgeson, S., Burnside, R., Robinson, M., Mack, R., Ball, C., Guru, P., & Moss, J. (2022) · The American journal of hospice & palliative care · doi:10.1177/10499091221115732 · Cited by 29
“By using multiple previously published data on MICU patient satisfaction, a total sample size of 95 patients would be required to detect a meaningful difference with an 80% power and a type 1 error of 5%.(8,14-16,29,30) MICU patient satisfaction (primary outcome) caregiver satisfaction scores (secondary outcome) were…”
MethodReview of Mendelian Randomization Studies on Endometrial Cancer
Guo, J.-Z., Wu, Q., Liu, F.-H., Gao, C., Gong, T., & Li, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.783150 · Cited by 31
Acosta, M., Riley, S., Bonilla-Findji, O., Martínez-Barón, D., Howland, F., Huyer, S., Castellanos, A., Martínez, J. D., & Chanana, N. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su131910951 · Cited by 27
Wu, Q.-W. L., Zhu, P., Ji, Q., Shi, G., Qian, M., Xu, H., Gu, X., Wang, W., & Zhang, Q. (2023) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105809 · Cited by 25
Zhang, B., Sun, Q., Lv, Y., Sun, T., Zhao, W.-Y., Yan, R., & Guo, Y.-C. (2022) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2022.107614 · Cited by 24
Petek, T. H., Homšak, E., Svetej, M., & Varda, N. M. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms251910599 · Cited by 23
“The sample size estimation was performed using an online tool from the Cleveland Clinic site, according to a published article [44], utilizing an alpha value of 0.05 and a test power of 80%.”
MethodInfluentialCiricugno, A., Oldrati, V., Cattaneo, Z., Leggio, M. G., Urgesi, C., & Olivito, G. (2024) · The Cerebellum · doi:10.1007/s12311-023-01652-z · Cited by 24
Zhong, S., Sun, Q.-Z., Wen, J., Zhang, Z., Chen, Y., Ye, H.-Y., Huang, W.-Z., Zheng, J., Liu, H., Fan, X., et al. (2024) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2024.06.001 · Cited by 22
Ajong, A. B., Kenfack, B., Ali, I. M., Yakum, M. N., Ukaogo, P. O., Mangala, F. N., Aljerf, L., & Téléfo, P. B. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0292303 · Cited by 28
Hamasaki, H. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11192668 · Cited by 24
“…steps in designing an RCT. Sufficient sample size to detect a statistical difference between the intervention group and the control group depended on the RCT design [36]; thus, the study protocol that explains how to design and estimate sample size is essential to conducting high-quality RCTs.”
Tsai, M., Tseng, W., Ou, S., Lee, K., Yang, C., & Tarng, D. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13061870 · Cited by 24
Ge, Q., Li, M., Xu, Z., Qi, Z., Zheng, H., Cao, Y., Huang, H., Duan, X., & Zhuang, X. (2022) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-021-02713-w · Cited by 32
“In that study, the cut-off value for WHR was not suitable for predicting T2DM compared with that of BMI and WHtR [19].”
MethodKaraarslan, F., Yılmaz, H., Akkurt, H. E., Gül, S., & Kardeş, S. (2021) · International Journal of Biometeorology · doi:10.1007/s00484-021-02137-6 · Cited by 26
“05 (as conventionally is set to this value) in a two-tailed test (Wang and Ji 2020).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEdoa, J., Adégbitè, B., Honkpéhédji, Y. J., Zinsou, J., Boussougou-Sambe, S. T., Woldearegai, T. G., Mordmüller, B., Adegnika, A., & Dejon-Agobé, J. (2024) · Tropical Medicine and Health · doi:10.1186/s41182-023-00567-z · Cited by 20
Chen, Y., Zhao, Z., Huang, J., Wang, T., & Qu, Y. (2024) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/s12883-024-03613-3 · Cited by 25
“We obtained a single group of 15 patients for which the specific formula was used [37] (α = 0.05, β = 0.20).”
MethodInfluentialStadio, A. D., Gallina, S., Cocuzza, S. G., Luca, P. D., Ingrassia, A., Oliva, S., Sireci, F., Camaioni, A., Ferreli, F., Mercante, G., et al. (2023) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-023-08085-8 · Cited by 20
Cortisol dysregulation in anxiety infertile women and the influence on IVF treatment outcome
Chai, Y., Li, Q., Wang, Y., Niu, B., Chen, H., Fan, T.-X., Ke, X., & Zou, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2023.1107765 · Cited by 19
Yang, J., & Wu, J. (2023) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1080/14737159.2023.2208750 · Cited by 19
“proposed that a pilot study with a small sample size should be conducted before conducting a larger study to assess whether it is worthwhile to expand the research [132].”
BackgroundEffects of Sprint Interval Training at Different Altitudes on Cycling Performance at Sea-Level
Warnier, G., Benoît, N., Naslain, D., Lambrecht, S., Francaux, M., & Deldicque, L. (2020) · Sports · doi:10.3390/sports8110148 · Cited by 21
Ataei Kachouei, A., Kamrani, F., Haghighatdoost, F., Mohammadifard, N., Najafi, F., Farshidi, H., Lotfizadeh, M., Kazemi, T., Karimi, S., Roohafza, H., et al. (2024) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-024-20369-0 · Cited by 18
“Therefore, our study sample size (1994 individuals) would be large enough to provide adequate power [17, 18].”
BackgroundWang, Y., Li, J.-P., Zhai, M., Zhao, Y., & Li, Q. (2023) · Thoracic Cancer · doi:10.1111/1759-7714.15164 · Cited by 18
Cei, F., Chiarugi, L., Brancati, S., Montini, M. S., Dolenti, S., di Stefano, D., Beatrice, S., Sellerio, I., Messiniti, V., Gucci, M., et al. (2022) · Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113454 · Cited by 18
“05 and power = 80 %, with a difference in the incidence of the primary outcome of at least 10 %, we estimated need of a sample of 594 patients, using a sample size calculator [15].”
Understanding the Lower and Upper Limits of Sample Sizes in Clinical Research
Hamad, A. A., & Ahmed, S. K. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.76724 · Cited by 15
He, X., Chen, J., Zhang, L., Li, Q.-P., Zhu, X.-L., Zhao, J., & Chen, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1421314 · Cited by 16
Cantone, E., D'Ascanio, L., de Luca, P., Roccamatisi, D., Mantia, I. L. L., Brenner, M. J., & di Stadio, A. (2024) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-024-08548-6 · Cited by 16
“The sample size was calculated as described by Wang and Ji [21], utilizing the protocol specific for Randomized Clinical Trials available at calculator.net (https:// www. calcu lator. net/ sample- size-calcu lator. html? type= 1& cl= 95& ci=6.”
MethodPu, Z., Huang, H., Li, M., Li, H., Shen, X., Du, L., Wu, Q., Fang, X., Meng, X., Ni, Q., et al. (2025) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121130 · Cited by 17
“The sample size was calculated according to the method for a cross-sectional diagnostic study (Schmidt et al., 2018; Wang and Ji, 2020).”
de Oliveira, M. N., Vidigal, M. T. C., Vieira, W. D. A., Lins‐Candeiro, C. L., Oliveira, L. M., Nascimento, G. G., da Silva, G. R., & Paranhos, L. R. (2024) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-024-05595-5 · Cited by 17
“Such a scenario opens comparison possibilities that are unfeasible for conventional randomized clinical trials because of the need for numerous groups and samples [11, 12].”
Xie, K., Guan, S.-N., Jing, H., Ji, W., Kong, X., Du, S., Jia, M., & Wang, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1227436 · Cited by 15
“It is not uncommon that a study fails to explore even exaggerated treatment effects because of insuf fi cient sample size (Wang and Ji, 2020).”
The Micromobility Tendencies of People and Their Transport Behavior
Kalašová, A., & Čulík, K. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app131910559 · Cited by 15
Mortier, A., Khoudary, J., de ten Ryen, S. V. D., Lannoy, C., Benoit, N., Antoine, N., Copine, S., Remoortel, H. V., Vandekerckhove, P. G., Compernolle, V., et al. (2023) · Vox Sanguinis · doi:10.1111/vox.13569 · Cited by 16
“A statistical power analysis was carried out to determine the optimum number of subjects needed to find a difference in total serum protein mean of 10% [8] with a standard deviation of 8% and a power of 80% according to the calculator developed by Wang and Ji [ 19].”
MethodPeng, Y., Xu, Y., Yue, L.-P., Chen, F., Wang, J., & Sun, G.-Z. (2023) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s405217 · Cited by 15
Ha, Y.-C., Kim, S., & Yoo, J.-I. (2024) · Journal of Bone Metabolism · doi:10.11005/jbm.2024.31.3.219 · Cited by 14
“[25] The target group was recruited by distinguishing the distribution of age groups, BMI, and gender.”
BackgroundMethodZhang, M., Zhang, H., Zhu, R., Yang, H., Chen, M., Wang, X., Li, Z., & Xiong, Z. (2023) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1259158 · Cited by 19
“Following the formula for determining sample size in multifactor analysis, the sample size should be 15–20 times the number of variables influencing the analysis (27).”
MethodSelf-citationStuck, A., Mangold, J. M., Wittwer, R., Limacher, A., & Bischoff-Ferrari, H. (2021) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2021.09.029 · Cited by 14
“Motor FIM score, median (IQR) 56 (43-66) Motor FIM gain, median (IQR) 14 (7-22) Motor FIM effectiveness, mean (SD) 0.”
BackgroundMaternal and neonatal outcomes in transverse and vertical skin incision for placenta previa
Fan, D., Zhang, H., Rao, J., Lin, D., Wu, S., Li, P., Chen, G., Zhou, Z., Liu, J., Chen, T., et al. (2021) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-021-03923-1 · Cited by 18
Payne, D. L., Xu, X., Faraji, F., John, K., Pradas, K. F., Bernard, V., Bangiyev, L., & Prasanna, P. (2024) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a8141 · Cited by 13
Song, Z., Zhou, Q., Zhang, J.-L., Ouyang, J., & Zhang, Z.-Y. (2024) · World Journal of Clinical Cases · doi:10.12998/wjcc.v12.i1.32 · Cited by 13
Continuous Cold Flow Device Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: Myths and Reality
Coviello, M., Abate, A., Ippolito, F., Nappi, V., Maddalena, R., Maccagnano, G., Noia, G., & Caiaffa, V. (2022) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina58111537 · Cited by 13
LuftiBus in the school (LUIS): a population-based study on respiratory health in schoolchildren.Preprint
Mozun, R., Kuehni, C., Pedersen, E., Goutaki, M., Kurz, J., de Hoogh, K., Usemann, J., Singer, F., Latzin, P., Moeller, A., et al. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.10.14.20212076 · Cited by 13
Changes of serum cortisol during pregnancy and labor initiation: an onsite cross-sectional study
Chai, Y., Wang, H., Tang, D., Wu, Y., Sun, Z., Zeng, Y., Zhang, B., Niu, B., & Dong, X. (2024) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2024.1379693 · Cited by 12
Dauvergne, J. E., Ferey, K., Croizard, V., Chauvin, M., Mainguy, N., Mathelier, N., Jehanno, A., Maugars, N., Badre, G., Maze, F., et al. (2023) · Nursing in Critical Care · doi:10.1111/nicc.12945 · Cited by 15
Revisiting a Null Hypothesis: Exploring the Parameters of Oligometastasis Treatment
Scarborough, J. A., Tom, M. C., Kattan, M. W., & Scott, J. G. (2021) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.12.044 · Cited by 10
“, 2020 (41)) in four clinical scenarios: a fast grow258 ing tumor type which is detected early, a fast growing tu259 mor type which is detected late, a slow growing tumor type 260 which is detected early, and a slow growing tumor type which 261 is growing late.”
BackgroundLi, Q., Chen, C., Wu, J., Poon, L. C., Wang, C.-C., Li, T. C., Zhang, T., Guo, X., Song, L., Wang, X., et al. (2023) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dead178 · Cited by 11
Self-citationSartore, G., Caprino, R., Ragazzi, E., & Lapolla, A. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0269350 · Cited by 15
“96 (at 5% type I error), the formula [20] yielded a sample size of 246 subjects, that was rounded to 250.”
MethodBaraka, A., Meda, J., & Nyundo, A. (2022) · medRxiv · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0273200 · Cited by 11
Bautin, P., & Cohen-Adad, J. (2021) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102849 · Cited by 11
da Mata, L. R. F., Azevedo, C., Izidoro, L. C. D. R., Ferreira, D. F., Estevam, F. E., Amaral, F. M. A., & Chianca, T. (2021) · Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem · doi:10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0692 · Cited by 11
“The sample size calculation was defined using the statistical test of simple random sample for finite population(18), estimating a proportion of UI referring to the population of interest equal to 46.”
MethodRached, N. A., Dietrich, J. W., Ocker, L., Quast, D. R., Scheel, C., Gambichler, T., & Bechara, F. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm12237490 · Cited by 10
“The sample size was calculated using established methods [30,31].”
MethodHammoud, S., van den Bemt, B. V. D., Jaber, A., & Kurdi, M. (2023) · Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport · doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2023.08.180 · Cited by 10
Mini-BESTest cutoff points for classifying fallers and non-fallers female older adults
Batistela, R. A., Rinaldi, N., & Moraes, R. (2023) · Brazilian Journal of Motor Behavior · doi:10.20338/bjmb.v17i4.354 · Cited by 10
Impact of commercial cooking on urban PM2.5 and O3 with online data-assisted emission inventory.
Yuan, Y., Zhu, Y., Lin, C.-J., Wang, S., Xie, Y.-H., Li, H.-X., Xing, J., Zhao, B., Zhang, M.-M., & You, Z.-Q. (2023) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162256 · Cited by 10
“The sample size of investigated restaurants could make the anticipation error 5 % under the premise of 95 % con fi dence interval, which metthe statistical requirements (Wang and Ji, 2020).”
D'Acapito, F., Cucchetti, A., Solaini, L., Serenari, M., Framarini, M., & Ercolani, G. (2022) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-022-06854-w · Cited by 10
Ksiaa, I., Khochtali, S., Mefteh, M., Fredj, M. B., Amor, H. B., Abroug, N., & Khairallah, M. (2021) · Eye · doi:10.1038/s41433-021-01491-4 · Cited by 10
Petek, T. H., Homšak, E., Svetej, M., & Varda, N. M. (2024) · Biomedicines · doi:10.3390/biomedicines13010058 · Cited by 9
“The sample size was determined using an online calculator available on the Cleveland Clinic website, based on a published article [26], with an alpha value of 0.05 and a power of 80%.”
InfluentialKrull, D., Haynes, P., Kesarwani, A. K., Tessier, J., Chen, B. J., Hunter, K., Rodriguez, D., Liang, Y., Mansfield, J. R., McClain, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Histotechnology · doi:10.1080/01478885.2024.2391683 · Cited by 9
“This process is dependent on the type and sub-types of the study designs, the type of outcome, and a specified hypothesis test [27].”
Boulares, A., Pichon, A., Faucher, C., Bragazzi, N. L., & Dupuy, O. (2024) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-240711 · Cited by 15
Okunade, K., Adejimi, A., Adekanye, T., Allsop, M. J., Adelabu, H., Thomas-Ogodo, O., Onyeka, T., Lawanson, T., Akaba, G. O., Salako, O., et al. (2024) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-024-12538-6 · Cited by 9
“…of 28.5% for a usual care condition derived from the systematic review by Asgedom et al [19] and an expected attrition rate of 20%, a sample size [20] of n = 123 women is expected to provide 80% power to establish a 30% proportional difference in HPV vaccination uptake between mHealth…”
MethodInfluentialBeyaz, S., Yayli, S. B., Kılıç, E., & Kılıç, K. (2024) · Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica · doi:10.5152/j.aott.2024.23065 · Cited by 9
Sample size considerations in research
Sivasamy, S. (2023) · Endodontology · doi:10.4103/endo.endo_235_23 · Cited by 9
Hemami, R. M., Shakarami, A., Ardekani, A. M., Aghaii, S., Makarem, D., Nikrad, N., Farhangi, M. A., & Abbasi, M. S. P. (2023) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12902-023-01458-4 · Cited by 7
Wang, G.-F., Ou, M., Chen, H., Zhu, S.-J., Chen, Y.-Y., & Xu, X.-H. (2023) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2023.1200820 · Cited by 9
Harantová, V., Kalašová, A., Kubíková, S., Mazanec, J., & Jordová, R. (2022) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math10091394 · Cited by 9
Guo, X.-L., Wu, K.-L., Dang, L.-R., Liu, S.-T., Xu, J., Wang, R., Xu, J.-Y., Zhong, Y.-M., Chen, Z., & Wu, B.-L. (2025) · International Dental Journal · doi:10.1016/j.identj.2025.100958 · Cited by 8
“40 Without longitudinal sampling or refined clinical staging, it remains difficult to determine whether the observed regulatory changes are stage-spe-cific or reflect broader disease-associated trends.”
Ceniza-Bordallo, G., Fraile, A. G., López-de-Uralde-Villanueva, I., Rabbitts, J., Li, R., Palermo, T. M., & Martín-Casas, P. (2025) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105476 · Cited by 8
Tian, L., Zhu, M., Song, Y., Wang, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-22906-x · Cited by 8
Rached, N. A., Dietrich, J. W., Ocker, L., Stockfleth, E., Haven, Y., Myszkowski, D., & Bechara, F. (2025) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm14072145 · Cited by 8
“The calculation of the sample size was based on Wang et al. [33], which is available at https://riskcalc.org/samplesize/ (accessed on 1 June 2023).”
Liu, S., Li, J., Chen, X., Jiang, X., Tang, R., & Lv, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1457151 · Cited by 8
Geng, X., Dong, Z., Li, Y., Zhao, M.-W., Liu, Y.-Q., Li, Z.-J., Cai, H., Zhang, M., Yan, X.-F., Sun, Z., et al. (2024) · Orthopaedic Surgery · doi:10.1111/os.14277 · Cited by 8
Fässler, L., Bighelli, I., Leucht, S., Sabé, M., Bajbouj, M., Knaevelsrud, C., & Böge, K. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0306324 · Cited by 11
Ababneh, O., Bsisu, I. K., El-Share', A. I., Alrabayah, M., Qudaisat, I., Alghanem, S. M., Khreesha, L. A., Ali, A., & Rashdan, M. Z. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11212818 · Cited by 8
“The required sample size was calculated using Sample Size Calculator (http://riskcalc.org: 3838/samplesize/#, accessed on 1 March 2021) [40].”
MethodSermsaksasithorn, P., Asawanonda, P., Phutrakool, P., Ondee, T., Chariyavilaskul, P., Payungporn, S., Pongpirul, K., & Hirankarn, N. (2024) · Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids · doi:10.1159/000539492 · Cited by 4
“Categorical data will be expressed as a number and depending on which is more appropriate, continuous data will be reported as mean +/ − standard deviation or median +/ − interquartile range.”
BackgroundOżóg, P., Weber-Rajek, M., Radzimińska, A., & Goch, A. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20032198 · Cited by 8
“The sample size was calculated by the formula for the minimum sample size (Nmin) [32]:”
MethodLópez‐Durán, A., Becoña, E., Senra, C., Suárez-Castro, D., Barroso-Hurtado, M., & Martínez-Vispo, C. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19159770 · Cited by 9
Yi, A., Qin, X., Du, Z.-Y., Wang, T.-S., & Liu, F. (2021) · Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine · doi:10.1155/2021/3926822 · Cited by 8
“According to previous reports [9, 10], each group requires at least 30 cases.”
MethodRetractedAgoons, B., Yefou, M. D., Katte, J., Etoga, M. E., Agoons, D., Yepnjio, F., Boli, A., Wasnyo, Y., Sobngwi, E., & Mbanya, J. (2020) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.11147 · Cited by 8
Fabbri, A., Ruggeri, E., Virtuoso, A., Giannarelli, D., Raso, A., Chegai, F., Remotti, D., Signorelli, C., & Nelli, F. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17121948 · Cited by 7
“The sample size calculator tailored for observational cohort studies was utilized to determine the number of patients needed for this analysis [31].”
Zhang, J., Venchiarutti, R. L., Wang, X., & He, Q. (2025) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-025-03030-4 · Cited by 7
Self-citationExploring the role of inflammatory biomarkers in trigeminal neuralgia
Lai, S., Li, H., Xing, Y., Wu, D., Wang, L., & Liang, Q. (2024) · Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100930 · Cited by 8
Liang, W.-X., Cao, S.-H., Suo, Y.-S., Zhang, L.-N., Yang, L., Wang, P., Wang, H.-F., Wang, H.-F., Bai, G.-N., Li, Q., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1398803 · Cited by 7
Park, B., Choi, Y., Lee, J., Ahn, Y., Lee, E. J., & Son, C. (2024) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.08.001 · Cited by 8
Yuan, E. J., Chang, C. H., Chen, H.-H., & Huang, S. (2024) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.02.003 · Cited by 8
Hazzan, R., Ahmad, N. A., Habib, A. S., Saleh, I., & Ziv, N. (2024) · JGH Open · doi:10.1002/jgh3.13034 · Cited by 7
Lai, S., Liang, F., Zhang, W.-L., Zhao, Y., Li, J.-M., Zhao, Y.-D., Xu, Y., Ding, W., Zhan, J., Zhen, X., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1219071 · Cited by 7
D-DI/PLT can be a prognostic indicator for sepsis
Zhao, X., Wu, X., Si, Y., Xie, J.-G., Wang, L.-X., Liu, S.-S., Duan, C., Wang, Q.-M., Wu, D., Wang, Y., et al. (2023) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.15910 · Cited by 7
Yan, J. W., Slim, A., Aarsen, K. V., Choi, Y., Byrne, C., Poonai, N., Collins, H., & Clemens, K. K. (2023) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-023-01356-5 · Cited by 8
Estevinho, M., Pinho, R., Rodrigues, A., Ponte, A., Afecto, E., Correia, J., & Freitas, T. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12112685 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, X., & Ji, X.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Xiaofeng
- ORCID
- Wang, Xiaofeng
- Venue
- Chest
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- S12-S20
- ISSN
- 0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3039422431
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 105 · 2024: 121 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 24.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Keywords
- sample size determination, randomized controlled trials, observational studies, clinical research design, statistical power
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Sample Size, Observational Studies as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review