Cited by 1,694Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene expression and cancer classificationStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Web-based survival analysis tool tailored for medical research (KMplot): Development and implementation

Open access
Lánczky, András, Győrffy, Balázs·2021·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, enabling the assessment of clinical outcomes for disease progression and treatment efficiency. Despite its central importance, no commonly used spreadsheet software can handle survival analysis and there is no web server available for its computation. OBJECTIVE: Here, we introduce a web-based tool capable of performing univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards survival analysis using data generated by genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, or metabolomic studies. METHODS: We implemented different methods to establish cut-off values for the trichotomization or dichotomization of continuous data. The false discovery rate is computed to correct for multiple hypothesis testing. A multivariate analysis option enables comparing omics data with clinical variables. RESULTS: We established a registration-free web-based survival analysis tool capable of performing univariate and multivariate survival analysis using any custom-generated data. CONCLUSIONS: This tool fills a gap and will be an invaluable contribution to basic medical and clinical research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/27633

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lánczky, A., & Győrffy, B.
Affiliations
Semmelweis University (HU)
Corresponding author
Győrffy, Balázs
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2021-07-26
Volume
23
Issue
7
Pages
e27633
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3162350134
Cited by
1,694
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 134 · 2025: 235 · 2024: 383 · 2023: 578 · 2022: 356 · 2021: 8
FWCI
107.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Semmelweis Egyetem (2020-4.1.1.-TKP2020, TKP2020)
  • Innovációs és Technológiai Minisztérium (2020.1.16-Jövő-2021-00013, 2020-4.1.1-TKP2020, TKP2020, 2018-2.1.17-TET-KR-00001, 2018-1.3.1-VKE-2018-00032)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards model, web-based tool, omics data, multivariate survival analysis, false discovery rate, clinical outcome prediction, bioinformatics software
MeSH terms
Humans, Software, Survival Analysis, Internet, Biomedical Research, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review