A Perspective on the Educational “SWOT” of the Coronavirus Pandemic
Open accessAbstract
The coronavirus pandemic has disrupted clinical practice, health-care organizations, and life. In the context that "a crisis is a terrible thing to waste," as disruptive as the pandemic has been to traditional practices-both clinically and educationally-opportunities have also presented. Clinical benefits have included the propulsion of clinical innovation, including such items as the development of novel vaccines and accelerated understanding of multiplex ventilation. Approaches to educating students and other learners have also changed radically, with the suspension of live teaching in most instances and a precipitous transition to virtual instruction. This perspective considers a SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) associated with the coronavirus pandemic in health care that focuses on the implications for education. Although the obvious disadvantages (weaknesses) regard the loss of face-to-face interaction with all of its consequences (eg, isolation, risks to camaraderie, loss of hands-on training opportunities, and loss of in-person celebratory events like graduations and end-of-training celebrations), there are clearly offsetting strengths. These include growing experience with virtual teaching and virtual learning strategies, the invitation to codify best virtual teaching practices, a tightening of alignment between undergraduate and graduate medical education (eg, around virtual interview strategies), and opportunities for both self-reflection and a commitment to act virtuously. On balance, the pandemic has created the opportunity, indeed the necessity, to innovate in practice and in education, making the landscape ripe for creative practice, new mastery, and the concomitant benefits to learners and to educators.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several examples of SWOT implementation in the medical education domain have been reported in academic journals and used for strategic planning in chaotic situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019.
“Several examples of implementation in the medical education domain have been reported in academic journals and used for strategic planning in chaotic situations such as the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019 [28].”
From Developing Medical Education Curriculum Reform Strategies to Address the Impact of Generative AI: Qualitative Study (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Gittell, J. H. (2009) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Schmitt, M. H. (2010) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.3109/13561821003655717 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
The Culture Code: The Secrets of Highly Successful Groups
Coyle, D. (2018) · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Reflections on leadership in the time of COVID-19
Stoller, J. K. (2020) · BMJ Leader · doi:10.1136/leader-2020-000244 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationBohmer, R. M. J. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c483 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
A physician's view of hospital design. The impact of verticality on interaction.
Stoller, J. K. (1988) · PubMed · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [3]Clough J.D. To Act as a Unit: The Story of the Cleveland Clinic 5th ed. 2012 Cleveland Clinic Press Cleveland, OH
- [10]Rea P. Stoller J.K. Kolp A. Exception to the Rule: The Surprising Science of Character-Based Culture, Engagement, and Performance 2018 McGraw-Hill Education New York
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shimizu, I., Kasai, H., Shikino, K., Araki, N., Takahashi, Z., Onodera, M., Kimura, Y., Tsukamoto, T., Yamauchi, K., Asahina, M., et al. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/53466 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stoller, J. K.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stoller, James K.
- ORCID
- Stoller, James K.
- Venue
- Chest
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 743-748
- ISSN
- 0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7500394
- OpenAlex
- W3087003270
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, medical education, virtual teaching, SWOT analysis, clinical innovation, virtual interviews, learner isolation, medical licensing examinations
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Education, Medical, Graduate, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Humans, Organizational Innovation, Education, Distance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review