Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eosinophilic and Noneosinophilic Asthma

Open access
Heaney, Liam G., Perez de Llano, Luis, Al-Ahmad, Mona, Backer, Vibeke, Busby, John, Canonica, Giorgio Walter, Christoff, George C., Cosio, Borja G., FitzGerald, J. Mark, Heffler, Enrico, Iwanaga, Takashi, Jackson, David J., Menzies-Gow, Andrew N., Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G., Papaioannou, Andriana I., Pfeffer, Paul E., Popov, Todor A., Porsbjerg, Celeste M., Rhee, Chin Kook, Sadatsafavi, Mohsen, Tohda, Yuji, Wang, Eileen, Wechsler, Michael E., Alacqua, Marianna, Altraja, Alan, Bjermer, Leif, Björnsdóttir, Unnur S., Bourdin, Arnaud, Brusselle, Guy G., Buhl, Roland, Costello, Richard W., Hew, Mark, Koh, Mariko Siyue, Lehmann, Sverre, Lehtimäki, Lauri, Peters, Matthew, Taillé, Camille, Taube, Christian, Tran, Trung N., Zangrilli, James, Bulathsinhala, Lakmini, Carter, Victoria A., Chaudhry, Isha, Eleangovan, Neva, Hosseini, Naeimeh, Kerkhof, Marjan, Murray, Ruth B., Price, Chris A., Price, David B.·2021·Chest

Abstract

Background Phenotypic characteristics of patients with eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma are not well characterized in global, real-life severe asthma cohorts. Research Question What is the prevalence of eosinophilic and noneosinophilic phenotypes in the population with severe asthma, and can these phenotypes be differentiated by clinical and biomarker variables? Study Design and Methods This was an historical registry study. Adult patients with severe asthma and available blood eosinophil count (BEC) from 11 countries enrolled in the International Severe Asthma Registry (January 1, 2015-September 30, 2019) were categorized according to likelihood of eosinophilic phenotype using a predefined gradient eosinophilic algorithm based on highest BEC, long-term oral corticosteroid use, elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide, nasal polyps, and adult-onset asthma. Demographic and clinical characteristics were defined at baseline (ie, 1 year before or closest to date of BEC). Results One thousand seven hundred sixteen patients with prospective data were included; 83.8% were identified as most likely (grade 3), 8.3% were identified as likely (grade 2), and 6.3% identified as least likely (grade 1) to have an eosinophilic phenotype, and 1.6% of patients showed a noneosinophilic phenotype (grade 0). Eosinophilic phenotype patients (ie, grades 2 or 3) showed later asthma onset (29.1 years vs 6.7 years; P < .001) and worse lung function (postbronchodilator % predicted FEV 1 , 76.1% vs 89.3%; P = .027) than those with a noneosinophilic phenotype. Patients with noneosinophilic phenotypes were more likely to be women (81.5% vs 62.9%; P = .047), to have eczema (20.8% vs 8.5%; P = .003), and to use anti-IgE (32.1% vs 13.4%; P = .004) and leukotriene receptor antagonists (50.0% vs 28.0%; P = .011) add-on therapy. Interpretation According to this multicomponent, consensus-driven, and evidence-based eosinophil gradient algorithm (using variables readily accessible in real life), the severe asthma eosinophilic phenotype was more prevalent than previously identified and was phenotypically distinct. This pragmatic gradient algorithm uses variables readily accessible in primary and specialist care, addressing inherent issues of phenotype heterogeneity and phenotype instability. Identification of treatable traits across phenotypes should improve therapeutic precision.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.013

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Metadata

Authors
Heaney, L. G., Perez de Llano, L., Al-Ahmad, M., Backer, V., Busby, J., Canonica, G. W., Christoff, G. C., Cosio, B. G., FitzGerald, J. M., Heffler, E., Iwanaga, T., Jackson, D. J., Menzies-Gow, A. N., Papadopoulos, N. G., Papaioannou, A. I., Pfeffer, P. E., Popov, T. A., Porsbjerg, C. M., Rhee, C. K., Sadatsafavi, M., Tohda, Y., Wang, E., Wechsler, M. E., Alacqua, M., Altraja, A., Bjermer, L., Björnsdóttir, U. S., Bourdin, A., Brusselle, G. G., Buhl, R., Costello, R. W., Hew, M., Koh, M. S., Lehmann, S., Lehtimäki, L., Peters, M., Taillé, C., Taube, C., Tran, T. N., Zangrilli, J., Bulathsinhala, L., Carter, V. A., Chaudhry, I., Eleangovan, N., Hosseini, N., Kerkhof, M., Murray, R. B., Price, C. A., & Price, D. B.
Venue
Chest
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
160
Issue
3
Pages
814-830
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3152894658
Cited by
282
References
41
FWCI
23.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eosinophilic and Noneosinophilic Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.013
The paper
Heaney, L. G., Perez de Llano, L., Al-Ahmad, M., Backer, V., Busby, J., Canonica, G. W., Christoff, G. C., Cosio, B. G., FitzGerald, J. M., Heffler, E., Iwanaga, T., Jackson, D. J., Menzies-Gow, A. N., Papadopoulos, N. G., Papaioannou, A. I., Pfeffer, P. E., Popov, T. A., Porsbjerg, C. M., Rhee, C. K., . . . Price, D. B. (2021). Eosinophilic and Noneosinophilic Asthma. Chest. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.