CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric HealthcarePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics in medical practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

COUNTERPOINT: Is It Ethically Justifiable to Withdraw Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Against the Wishes of a Patient With Decision-Making Capacity When Cure Is Not Possible? No

Open access
Childress, Andrew M.·2024·CHEST
DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.174
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.174

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Trotter, 1999, Mediating disputes about medical futility, Camb Q Healthc Ethics, 8, 527, 10.1017/S0963180199004156 · DOI
  2. Brody, 1995, Is futility a futile concept?, J Med Philos, 20, 123
  3. Schou, 2021, Ethics in extracorporeal life support: a narrative review, Crit Care, 25, 256, 10.1186/s13054-021-03689-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Childress, 2023, From bridge to destination? ethical considerations related to withdrawal of ECMO support over the objections of capacitated patients, Am J Bioeth, 23, 5, 10.1080/15265161.2022.2075959 · DOI
  5. Abrams, 2014, Ethical dilemmas encountered with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults, Chest, 145, 876, 10.1378/chest.13-1138 · DOI
  6. Bosslet, 2015, An official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM policy statement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 191, 1318, 10.1164/rccm.201505-0924ST · DOI
  7. Kon, 2016, Defining futile and potentially inappropriate interventions: a policy statement from the Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee, Crit Care Med, 44, 1769, 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001965 · DOI
  8. Morley, 2020, Debriefing as a response to moral distress, J Clin Ethics, 31, 283, 10.1086/JCE2020313283 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Childress, A. M.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Childress, Andrew M.
ORCID
Childress, Andrew M.
Venue
CHEST
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
166
Issue
6
Pages
1283-1285
ISSN
0012-3692 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.174
OpenAlex
W4405196624
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • CHEST Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, patient decision-making capacity, informed consent, moral justification, end-of-life decisions, clinical ethics consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COUNTERPOINT: Is It Ethically Justifiable to Withdraw Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Against the Wishes of a Patient With Decision-Making Capacity When Cure Is Not Possible? No. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.174
The paper
Childress, A. M. (2024). COUNTERPOINT: Is It Ethically Justifiable to Withdraw Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Against the Wishes of a Patient With Decision-Making Capacity When Cure Is Not Possible? No. CHEST. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.174