Cited by 60Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Stabilizing group treatment for Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder related to childhood abuse based on psycho-education and cognitive behavioral therapy: A pilot study

Dorrepaal, Ethy, Thomaes, Kathleen, Smit, Johannes H., van Balkom, Anton J.L.M., van Dyck, Richard, Veltman, Dick J., Draijer, Nel·2010·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Objective This study tests a Stabilizing Group Treatment protocol, designed for the management of the long-term sequelae of child abuse, that is, Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (Complex PTSD). Evidence-based treatment for this subgroup of PTSD patients is largely lacking. This stabilizing treatment aims at improving Complex PTSD using psycho-education and cognitive behavioral interventions. Method Thirty-six patients with a history of childhood abuse, Complex PTSD and severe co-morbidity entered a 20-week treatment with pre-, post-, and follow-up-assessments. Results Improvement was found for PTSD and borderline symptoms. Post-treatment 64% and after 6 months 78% of patients no longer met criteria for Complex PTSD. Conclusions This open study indicates both the feasibility of investigating treatment outcome and the initial efficacy of stabilizing group treatment in severely ill patients with Complex PTSD related to childhood abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.07.003

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior research has suggested that short-term therapies may not be effective for populations exposed to ongoing trauma or multiple severe traumas.

    “Prior research has suggested that short-term therapies may not be effective for populations exposed to ongoing trauma or multiple severe traumas.37,38”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dorrepaal, E., Thomaes, K., Smit, J. H., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., van Dyck, R., Veltman, D. J., & Draijer, N.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • GGZ inGeest (NL)
Corresponding author
Dorrepaal, Ethy
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
284-288
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155672151
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
complex PTSD, childhood abuse, psychoeducation, cognitive behavioral therapy, borderline symptoms, comorbidities, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Personality Inventory, Pilot Projects, Psychotherapy, Group, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review