Cited by 190Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceBullying, Victimization, and AggressionChild Abuse and Trauma

Physical and psychological aggression in dating relationships of Spanish adolescents: Motives and consequences

Fernández-Fuertes, Andres A., Fuertes, Antonio·2010·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of the study was to examine three aspects of romantic relationships of Spanish adolescents: the prevalence of verbal-emotional and physical aggressive behaviors, correlates of dating violence perpetration (both verbal-emotional and physical aggression), and consequences of violence for victims' well-being. Method A convenience sample of 567 participants (15-19 years old) who voluntarily completed anonymous, self-report questionnaires was used. All were students from 5 public high schools in Salamanca, Spain. Results Females reported having perpetrated significantly more aggressive acts in their intimate relationships than males did, although the magnitude of differences between both groups was small; in contrast, no sex differences were noted in the frequency of aggressions suffered by adolescents. A strong relationship was observed between the perpetration and victimization of both verbal-emotional and physical aggression across genders. A strong link was observed between jealousy and aggression perpetration (both verbal-emotional and physical). Finally, verbal-emotional aggression represented the most common form of aggressive behavior used at these ages, and relationship deterioration was the most frequent consequence of arguments. Conclusions These results demonstrate that the use of abusive behaviors in adolescent dating relationships is prevalent in Spain. Sex differences were evident in the perpetration of aggression, as well as some of the motivations for, and the effects of, dating violence. Practice implications The present study underlines the need for early intervention programs aimed at decreasing any tolerance for the use of violence in dating relationships of Spanish adolescents. Such programs should include both victimization-based and perpetration-based activities, since the evidence on the relatively mutual nature of dating violence in adolescence points in this direction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.01.002

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernández-Fuertes, A. A., & Fuertes, A.
Affiliations
Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
183-191
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053503659
Cited by
190
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
adolescent dating violence, romantic relationships, physical aggression, aggression perpetration, victimization, jealousy, sex differences, relationship deterioration, Spanish adolescents, early intervention programs
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aggression, Courtship, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Jealousy, Male, Motivation, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Spain, Violence, Reproducibility of Results, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review