Cited by 47Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild Welfare and AdoptionPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Differential responsiveness to a parenting intervention for mothers in substance abuse treatment.

Paris, Ruth, Herriott, Anna, Holt, Melissa, Gould, Karen·2015·Child Abuse & Neglect

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between levels of psychological distress in substance-dependent mothers and their differential response to a dyadic parent-child intervention. A sample of 66 mothers who were receiving treatment for substance abuse, as well as a simultaneous parenting intervention, were interviewed pre and post-treatment on measures of psychological distress, adult and child trauma history, parental reflective functioning, and child social-emotional development. Additionally, clinicians provided assessments of the parent-child relationships. As anticipated, trauma histories for mothers and children, children's social emotional development, and parental reflective functioning were associated with aspects of maternal psychological distress. Kruskal-Wallis and subsequent Wilcoxson signed rank tests revealed that women with highest levels of baseline psychological distress showed significant improvements in psychological functioning post-treatment while women with moderately elevated levels of psychological distress did not. Women who were most distressed at baseline showed increased levels of parental reflective functioning post-treatment while women with moderate and lower levels of baseline psychological distress showed improvements on clinician-rated assessments of parent-child relationships. Chi Square analyses showed that parents who endorsed the highest levels of distress at baseline reported that their children's risk status regarding social-emotional development decreased post-treatment. Despite similarities in substance dependence, mothers in this sample had different needs and outcomes in the context of this parenting intervention due to variation in mental health. Given this variation, parenting interventions for substance-dependent mothers need to account for the individual differences in levels of psychological distress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.09.007

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paris, R., Herriott, A., Holt, M., & Gould, K.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Institute for Health and Recovery (US)
Corresponding author
Paris, Ruth
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
50
Pages
206-217
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2178373799
Cited by
47
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2U79SM059460-04)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
parenting support, maternal distress, parental reflective functioning, child social-emotional development, parent-child relationship, individual differences in treatment response, addiction treatment
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Developmental Disabilities, Female, Humans, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Parents, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Parenting, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review