The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Risk preferences, production contracts and technology adoption by broiler farmers in China
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The positive regression and correlations between education and technology use and adoption hypothesized and proposed in previous studies [72-74].”
From A Study of the Adoption and Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): Identification of Moderators and Mediator (2020) · cites this paper as [74]
In the citing paper
“The results are not consistent with the thoughts of earlier studies [72-74].”
From A Study of the Adoption and Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP): Identification of Moderators and Mediator (2020) · cites this paper as [74]
Citations
Cites
Agricultural Development: An International Perspective.
Hallett, G., Hayami, Y., & Rutton, V. W. (1972) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2230054 · Cited by 2,316
Learning about a New Technology: Pineapple in Ghana
Conley, T. G., & Udry, C. R. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.1.35 · Cited by 2,180
Attitudes Toward Risk: Experimental Measurement in Rural India
Binswanger, H. P. D. (1980) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.2307/1240194 · Cited by 1,645
Risk and Time Preferences: Linking Experimental and Household Survey Data from Vietnam
Tanaka, T., Camerer, C. F., & Nguyen, Q. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.1.557 · Cited by 1,079
Investment and Wages in the Absence of Binding Contracts: A Nash Bargaining Approach
Grout, P. A. (1984) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1911498 · Cited by 969
Risk and Time Preferences: Linking Experimental and Household Survey Data from Vietnam
Tanaka, T., Camerer, C. F., & Nguyen, Q. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-55402-8_1 · Cited by 746
Liu, E. M. (2012) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00295 · Cited by 607
Attitudes Toward Risk Among Peasants: An Econometric Approach
Moscardi, E., & de Janvry, A. (1977) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.2307/1239398 · Cited by 334
The Diffusion of New Agricultural Technologies: The Case of Crossbred‐Cow Technology in Tanzania
Abdulai, A., & Huffman, W. E. (2005) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8276.2005.00753.x · Cited by 325
The Transition to Modern Agriculture: Contract Farming in Developing Economies
Wang, H. H., Wang, Y., & Delgado, M. S. (2014) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aau036 · Cited by 265
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Uddin, M. A., Alam, M. S., Mamun, A. A., Khan, T.-U.-Z., & Akter, A. (2020) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc6010002 · Cited by 98
“Accordingly, the education of ERP users might influence their choices to use and adoption of technology [74].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Mao, H., Zhou, L., Ifft, J., & Ying, R.
- Affiliations
- Nanjing Agricultural University (CN)
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhou, Li
- Venue
- China Economic Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 54
- Pages
- 147-159
- ISSN
- 1043-951X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2898525746
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- China Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (71573130, 71203094)
- The Qing Lan Project
- The Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
- China Center for Food Security Studies
- Nanjing Agricultural University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Agricultural risk and resilience
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Development and Management
- Keywords
- farmer risk preferences, risk aversion, production contracts, technology adoption, broiler farmers, poultry farming, contract terms, cost sharing, credit constraints, technology investment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
