The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The next step: Integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Prior work has also explored the utility of algorithms designed to aid decisionmaking and found that they increased uncertainty and led to unreliable decisions since caseworkers were required to translate information from both the clinical and algorithmic assessments [111,113].”
From A Framework of High-Stakes Algorithmic Decision-Making for the Public Sector Developed through a Case Study of Child-Welfare (2021) · cites this paper as [113]
In the citing paper
“Moreover, the calls for human-in-the-loop might be moot if there is a lack of understanding about how algorithms impact human decision-making and how the type of decision-support (i.e.-algorithm design) impacts the practical possibilities for human intervention [96,111,113].”
From A Framework of High-Stakes Algorithmic Decision-Making for the Public Sector Developed through a Case Study of Child-Welfare (2021) · cites this paper as [113]
In the citing paper
“However, prior research shows that workers allow decision-aids to supplant their own decisions when they lack confidence and/or experience [42,107,113].”
From A Framework of High-Stakes Algorithmic Decision-Making for the Public Sector Developed through a Case Study of Child-Welfare (2021) · cites this paper as [113]
Citations
Cites
Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM
Sackett, D. L. (2000) · Cited by 5,950
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Cherniak, C., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1983) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184495 · Cited by 4,196
Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.
Connolly, T., Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1981) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392481 · Cited by 2,690
“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298
Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence.
Meehl, P. E. (1954) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/11281-000 · Cited by 2,227
Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM
Wilson, M. C. (2001) · ACP Journal Club · doi:10.7326/acpjc-2001-134-1-a15 · Cited by 1,672
Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293 · Cited by 1,457
Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM
Satya‐Murti, S. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550020100049 · Cited by 974
Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight
Gigerenzer, G., & Edwards, A. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7417.741 · Cited by 776
House of cards: psychology and psychotherapy built on myth
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-1228 · Cited by 754
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Dawes, 1993, Finding guidelines for tough decisions, Chronicle of Higher, 39
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Connell, C. M., Bergeron, N., Katz, K. H., Saunders, L., & Tebes, J. K. (2007) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.12.004 · Cited by 253
Broadhurst, K., Hall, C., Wastell, D. G., White, S., & Pithouse, A. (2010) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq011 · Cited by 233
Cuccaro-Alamin, S., Foust, R., Vaithianathan, R., & Putnam-Hornstein, E. (2017) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.027 · Cited by 145
Saxena, D., Badillo-Urquiola, K., Wisniewski, P. J., & Guha, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476089 · Cited by 134
“- algorithm design) impacts the practical possibilities for human intervention [96, 111, 113].”
BackgroundGillingham, P. (2015) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcv031 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- Shlonsky, A., & Wagner, D.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shlonsky, Aron
- ORCID
- Shlonsky, Aron
- Venue
- Children and Youth Services Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 409-427
- ISSN
- 0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073800181
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 14.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
- Keywords
- child protection services, actuarial risk assessment, clinical judgment, evidence-based practice, structured decision-making, contextual assessment, case planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
