Cited by 116Child Welfare and AdoptionPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCrime Patterns and Interventions

The effectiveness of institutional youth care over the past three decades: A meta-analysis

De Swart, J.J.W., Van den Broek, H., Stams, G.J.J.M., Asscher, J.J., Van der Laan, P.H., Holsbrink-Engels, G.A., Van der Helm, G.H.P.·2012·Children and Youth Services Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.05.015

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Swart, J. J. W., Van den Broek, H., Stams, G. J. J. M., Asscher, J. J., Van der Laan, P. H., Holsbrink-Engels, G. A., & Van der Helm, G. H. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Saxion (NL)
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
1818-1824
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974681955
Cited by
116
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
residential youth care, evidence-based treatment, usual care, cognitive behavioral therapy, social skills training, juvenile delinquency, behavioral problems, treatment effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review