The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The cost of implementing new strategies (COINS): A method for mapping implementation resources using the stages of implementation completion
Open accessAbstract
Objective Illustrate the value of a strategy used for measuring the costs and resources used in the implementation process over and above the costs of the intervention itself in the context of a two-arm randomized controlled trial.Methods Counties in California and Ohio (sites) were invited to implement Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care (MTFC), an alternative to congregate care for youth. Participating sites (n=53) were randomized to one of two implementation = sites share information and move through the implementation process as a cohort facilitated by an MTFC purveyor or (2) Individual Implementation (IND: "as usual") where sites work individually with the MTFC purveyor. The implementations were monitored using the Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) measure of a number of observable activities, developed as part of the trial to segment the implementation process into 8 stages of implementation. Resource data gathered from the implementation purveyors and site participants were used to map costs onto each of the 8 stages to generate total cost measures stratified by type of resource and stage of implementation for each of the study arms.Results The SIC provided a feasible costing template to map costs onto observable activities and to enable the examination of important differences in implementation strategies for an evidence-based practice. The average total implementation cost prior to program start-up of CDT was $133,106; IND cost $118,699. While CDT cost more in a number of stages, it resulted in fewer county staff hours being used and shorter mean times to implementation than IND. In cases where rapidity of implementation of reducing staff time required for implementation is valued, then CDT would be the preferable implementation approach.Conclusions The SIC is a useful tool for determining implementation resources needed for new evidence-based practice programs for youth and particularly for comparing different implementation strategies that might be tried in pilot programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Pre-implementation involves considerable costs (e.g., engagement and readiness planning [72]) that are rarely reimbursed.”
From Translating economic evaluations into financing strategies for implementing evidence-based practices (2021) · cites this paper as [72]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 · Cited by 14,496
Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7 · Cited by 8,721
Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General
United States. Public Health Service. Office of the Surgeon General (1999) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e636982009-001 · Cited by 3,105
Proctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4 · Cited by 1,894
Self-citationComparison of two community alternatives to incarceration for chronic juvenile offenders.
Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J. B. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.66.4.624 · Cited by 356
Self-citationComparison of two community alternatives to incarceration for chronic juvenile offenders.
Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J. B. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.66.4.624 · Cited by 331
Self-citationChamberlain, P., Brown, C. H., & Saldana, L. (2011) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-116 · Cited by 262
Self-citationChamberlain, P., Leve, L. D., & DeGarmo, D. S. (2007) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.75.1.187 · Cited by 238
Self-citationIntervention outcomes for girls referred from juvenile justice: Effects on delinquency.
Leve, L. D., Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J. B. (2005) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.73.6.1181 · Cited by 188
Self-citationPredicting program start-up using the stages of implementation measure
Saldana, L., Chamberlain, P., Wang, W., & Hendricks Brown, C. (2012) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-011-0363-y · Cited by 148
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda
Powell, B. J., Fernandez, M. E., Williams, N. J., Aarons, G. A., Beidas, R. S., Lewis, C. C., McHugh, S. M., & Weiner, B. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00003 · Cited by 775
Shelton, R. C., Chambers, D. A., & Glasgow, R. E. (2020) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00134 · Cited by 448
Stover, A. M., Haverman, L., van Oers, H. A., Greenhalgh, J., Potter, C., Ahmed, S., Greenhalgh, J., Gibbons, E. J., Haverman, L., Manalili, K., et al. (2020) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-020-02564-9 · Cited by 313
Eisman, A. B., Kilbourne, A. M., Dopp, A. R., Saldana, L., & Eisenberg, D. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.008 · Cited by 210
Self-citationSaldana, L. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-43 · Cited by 188
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Saldana, L., Chamberlain, P., Bradford, W. D., Campbell, M., & Landsverk, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Saldana, Lisa
- Venue
- Children and Youth Services Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 39
- Pages
- 177-182
- ISSN
- 0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3979632
- OpenAlex
- W1974930938
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH076158)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01MH076158-05S1, KDA021603)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- implementation costs, implementation resources, implementation strategies, evidence-based practice, juvenile delinquency treatment, cost mapping, implementation time, youth services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
