Cited by 148Health Policy Implementation ScienceEvaluation and Performance AssessmentPsychiatric care and mental health services

Predicting program start-up using the stages of implementation measure

Open access
Saldana, Lisa, Chamberlain, Patricia, Wang, Wei, Hendricks Brown, C.·2012·Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research

Abstract

Recent efforts to better understand the process of implementation have been hampered by a lack of tools available to define and measure implementation progress. The Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC) was developed as part of an implementation trial of MTFC in 53 sites, and identifies the duration of time spent on implementation activities and the proportion of activities completed. This article examines the ability of the first three stages of the SIC (Engagement, Consideration of Feasibility, Readiness Planning) to predict successful program start-up. Results suggest that completing SIC stages completely, yet relatively quickly, predicts the likelihood of successful implementation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10488-011-0363-y

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implementation can be considered a developmental process, a transition through known stages.

    “In order to apply social network theory and methods to implementation, we note first that implementation can be considered a developmental process, a transition through known stages [1, 34].”

    From Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation (2015) · cites this paper as [34]

  • Broad systems for measuring implementation process through key milestones, quality, and quantity, such as the Stages of Implementation Completion or similar unobtrusive measures, can likely be used to measure implementation fidelity and progress in diverse conditions.

    “Nevertheless, it is likely that broad systems for measuring implementation process through key milestones, quality, and quantity, such as those identified in the Stages of Implementation Completion [86–88], or similar unobtrusive measures [89] can be used to measure implementation fidelity and progress in diverse conditions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fixsen DL Blase KA Duda MA Naoom SF Van Dyke MK Weisz JR Kazdin AE Implementation of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: Research findings and their implications for the future Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents 2010 2nd ed New York Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saldana, L., Chamberlain, P., Wang, W., & Hendricks Brown, C.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Saldana, Lisa
Venue
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Published
2011-06-28
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
419-425
ISSN
  • 0894-587X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3289
OpenAlex
W1995981850
Cited by
148
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH076158, R25MH080916)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P30DA023920, K23DA021603)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
program implementation, implementation readiness, feasibility assessment, mental health services
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, California, Community Mental Health Services, Forecasting, Foster Home Care, Health Plan Implementation, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Ohio, Program Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review