Cited by 26Education Discipline and InequalityBehavioral and Psychological StudiesTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Professional development for teachers plus coaching related to school-wide suspensions for a large urban school system

Flynn, Rachel M., Lissy, Rachel, Alicea, Stacey, Tazartes, Lisa, McKay, Mary M.·2016·Children and Youth Services Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.01.015

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flynn, R. M., Lissy, R., Alicea, S., Tazartes, L., & McKay, M. M.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Flynn, Rachel M.
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
62
Pages
29-39
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2280018017
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
13.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
teacher professional development, classroom management, one-on-one coaching, urban school systems, intervention dosage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review