Cited by 46Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionWorkplace Violence and BullyingChild Abuse and Trauma

Are bully-victims homogeneous? Latent class analysis on school bullying.

Chung, Jae Young, Lee, Sunbok·2020·Children and Youth Services Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104922

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, J. Y., & Lee, S.
Affiliations
Ewha Womans University (KR)
Corresponding author
Chung, Jae Young
Venue
Children and Youth Services Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
112
Pages
104922
ISSN
0190-7409 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012170705
Cited by
46
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Children and Youth Services Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
school bullying, bully-victims, verbal bullying, social bullying, physical bullying, bullying victimization, bullying perpetration, eighth grade students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review