Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 332

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by Destruction of the Prefusion Spike

Open access
Huo, Jiandong, Zhao, Yuguang, Ren, Jingshan, Zhou, Daming, Duyvesteyn, Helen M.E., Ginn, Helen M., Carrique, Loic, Malinauskas, Tomas, Ruza, Reinis R., Shah, Pranav N.M., Tan, Tiong Kit, Rijal, Pramila, Coombes, Naomi, Bewley, Kevin R., Tree, Julia A., Radecke, Julika, Paterson, Neil G., Supasa, Piyada, Mongkolsapaya, Juthathip, Screaton, Gavin R., Carroll, Miles, Townsend, Alain, Fry, Elizabeth E., Owens, Raymond J., Stuart, David I.·2020·Cell Host & Microbe

Abstract

There are as yet no licensed therapeutics for the COVID-19 pandemic. The causal coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) binds host cells via a trimeric spike whose receptor binding domain (RBD) recognizes angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, initiating conformational changes that drive membrane fusion. We find that the monoclonal antibody CR3022 binds the RBD tightly, neutralizing SARS-CoV-2, and report the crystal structure at 2.4 Å of the Fab/RBD complex. Some crystals are suitable for screening for entry-blocking inhibitors. The highly conserved, structure-stabilizing CR3022 epitope is inaccessible in the prefusion spike, suggesting that CR3022 binding facilitates conversion to the fusion-incompetent post-fusion state. Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) analysis confirms that incubation of spike with CR3022 Fab leads to destruction of the prefusion trimer. Presentation of this cryptic epitope in an RBD-based vaccine might advantageously focus immune responses. Binders at this epitope could be useful therapeutically, possibly in synergy with an antibody that blocks receptor attachment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chom.2020.06.010

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 332

Metadata

Authors
Huo, J., Zhao, Y., Ren, J., Zhou, D., Duyvesteyn, H. M. E., Ginn, H. M., Carrique, L., Malinauskas, T., Ruza, R. R., Shah, P. N. M., Tan, T. K., Rijal, P., Coombes, N., Bewley, K. R., Tree, J. A., Radecke, J., Paterson, N. G., Supasa, P., Mongkolsapaya, J., Screaton, G. R., Carroll, M., Townsend, A., Fry, E. E., Owens, R. J., & Stuart, D. I.
Venue
Cell Host & Microbe
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
445-454.e6
ISSN
1931-3128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035950190
Cited by
332
References
9
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by Destruction of the Prefusion Spike. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.chom.2020.06.010
The paper
Huo, J., Zhao, Y., Ren, J., Zhou, D., Duyvesteyn, H. M. E., Ginn, H. M., Carrique, L., Malinauskas, T., Ruza, R. R., Shah, P. N. M., Tan, T. K., Rijal, P., Coombes, N., Bewley, K. R., Tree, J. A., Radecke, J., Paterson, N. G., Supasa, P., Mongkolsapaya, J., . . . Stuart, D. I. (2020). Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by Destruction of the Prefusion Spike. Cell Host & Microbe. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2020.06.010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.