Cited by 2,892SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchAnimal Virus Infections StudiesEnzyme Structure and Function

Structural and Functional Basis of SARS-CoV-2 Entry by Using Human ACE2

Open access
Wang, Qihui, Zhang, Yanfang, Wu, Lili, Niu, Sheng, Song, Chunli, Zhang, Zengyuan, Lu, Guangwen, Qiao, Chengpeng +6 more·2020·Cell

Abstract

The recent emergence of a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in China has caused significant public health concerns. Recently, ACE2 was reported as an entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we present the crystal structure of the C-terminal domain of SARS-CoV-2 (SARS-CoV-2-CTD) spike (S) protein in complex with human ACE2 (hACE2), which reveals a hACE2-binding mode similar overall to that observed for SARS-CoV. However, atomic details at the binding interface demonstrate that key residue substitutions in SARS-CoV-2-CTD slightly strengthen the interaction and lead to higher affinity for receptor binding than SARS-RBD. Additionally, a panel of murine monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and polyclonal antibodies (pAbs) against SARS-CoV-S1/receptor-binding domain (RBD) were unable to interact with the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, indicating notable differences in antigenicity between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. These findings shed light on the viral pathogenesis and provide important structural information regarding development of therapeutic countermeasures against the emerging virus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.045

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SARS-CoV-2 entry into target cells begins when the viral Spike protein receptor-binding domain engages ACE2.

    “Attachment and entry of SARS-CoV-2 to target cells is initiated when the virus engages its cognate receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) via the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the viral Spike protein, also called the S protein37.”

    From SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 and the aging immune system (2021) · cites this paper as [37]

  • The S2 subunit comprises FP, HR, CH, CD, TMD, CT, and is responsible for mediating fusion between virus and host cell membrane.

    “The S2 subunit comprises the fusion peptide (FP), double heptad repeat (HR), central helix region (CH), connector domain (CD), transmembrane domain (TMD), and cytoplasmic tail (CT), and the S2 subunit is responsible for mediating the fusion between the virus and the host cell membrane233–236”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [233]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lai M.M.C. Perlman S. Anderson L.J. Coronaviridae Knipe D.M. Howley P.M. Fields Virology 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1305 1335

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Q., Zhang, Y., Wu, L., Niu, S., Song, C., Zhang, Z., Lu, G., Qiao, C., Hu, Y., Yuen, K.-Y., Wang, Q., Zhou, H., Yan, J., & Qi, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Shanxi Agricultural University (CN)
  • Anhui University (CN)
  • Sichuan University (CN)
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Yan, Jinghua
  • Qi, Jianxun
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
181
Issue
4
Pages
894-904.e9
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015190630
Cited by
2,892
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 151 · 2024: 222 · 2023: 334 · 2022: 565 · 2021: 891 · 2020: 659 · 2019: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
80.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program (2020YFS0010)
  • Zhejiang University (2020XGZX031)
  • West China Hospital, Sichuan University (HX-2019-nCoV-004)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB29010202, 2018119, XDB29040302)
  • Sichuan University
  • Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Southern Medical University
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0500305)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81922044, 81973228, 81621091, 81673358)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, ACE2, viral entry receptor, spike protein, receptor binding domain, crystal structure, receptor binding affinity, SARS-CoV, antigenic differences, monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal antibodies
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Betacoronavirus, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2, SARS-CoV-2, Amino Acid Sequence, Epitopes, Humans, Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A, Models, Molecular, Phylogeny, Sequence Alignment, Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus, Virus Internalization, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review