Cited by 56Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies

Selective on-line serum peptide extraction and multidimensional separation by coupling a restricted-access material-based capillary trap column with nanoliquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Hu, Lianghai, Boos, Karl-Siegfried, Ye, Mingliang, Wu, Ren’an, Zou, Hanfa·2009·Journal of Chromatography A

Abstract

As the serum peptidome gets increasing attention for biomarker discovery, one of the important issues is how to efficiently extract the peptides from highly complex human serum for peptidome analysis. Here we developed a fully automated platform for direct injection, on-line extraction, multidimensional separation and MS detection of peptides present in human serum. A capillary SPE column packed with a novel mix mode restricted access material (RAM) exhibiting strong cation exchange and size exclusion chromatography (SCX/SEC) properties were coupled with a nanoliquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (nanoLC-MS) system. The capillary SPE column excludes the high abundant serum proteins such as HSA by size exclusion chromatography and simultaneously extracts the low molecular weight peptides by binding to sulfonic acid residues. Subsequently, the trapped peptides are eluted to a capillary LC column packed with a RP-C18 stationary phase. After injection of only 2 microL human serum to the one-dimensional nanoLC-MS system around 400 peptides could be identified. When conducting a multidimensional separation, the described SCX/SEC/RP-MS platform allows the separation and identification of 1286 peptides present in human serum by the injection and on-line processing of 20 microL human serum sample.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chroma.2009.05.030

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, L., Boos, K.-S., Ye, M., Wu, R., & Zou, H.
Affiliations
  • Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics (CN)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Zou, Hanfa
Venue
Journal of Chromatography A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
1216
Issue
28
Pages
5377-5384
ISSN
0021-9673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075173429
Cited by
56
References
31
Citations by year
2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatography A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, CAS Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Keywords
serum peptidome, restricted access materials, size exclusion chromatography, multidimensional separation, human serum, biomarker discovery, sulfonic acid functionalization
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Liquid, Equipment Design, Humans, Molecular Weight, Peptides, Reproducibility of Results, Proteomics, Solid Phase Extraction, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review