Cited by 70Analytical chemistry methods developmentSurfactants and Colloidal SystemsAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography

Application of vesicular coacervate phase for microextraction based on solidification of floating drop

Moradi, Morteza, Yamini, Yadollah·2012·Journal of Chromatography A

Abstract

A new, efficient and environmentally friendly method for the analysis of parabens as model compounds was developed using solidified floating vesicular coacervative drop microextraction (SFVCDME). A supramolecular solvent consisting of vesicles of decanoic acid in the nano- and microscale regimes was firstly used as the solvent in solidification of floating drop microextraction. The solvent was produced from the coacervation of decanoic acid aqueous vesicles in the presence of tetrabutylammonium (Bu(4)N(+)). Methylparaben (MP), ethylparaben (EP), and propylparaben (PP) were extracted on the basis of hydrophobic and π-cation interactions and the formation of hydrogen bonds. Microliter volume of vesicular coacervative droplet was delivered to the surface of the aqueous sample, and the sample was stirred for a desired time. The sample vial was cooled by immersing it into an ice bath for 3 min. The solidified solvent was transferred into a suitable vial and melted immediately. Twenty microliter of the vesicular coacervative solvent was directly injected to high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection, with no need to dilution or solvent evaporation. Several parameters affecting the microextraction efficiency including sample temperature, stirring rate, pH, salt effect, volume of the solvent and extraction time were investigated and optimized. Under optimum conditions, preconcentration factors and relative recoveries of the studied compounds were obtained in the ran…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.01.028

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moradi, M., & Yamini, Y.
Affiliations
Tarbiat Modares University (IR)
Corresponding author
Yamini, Yadollah
Venue
Journal of Chromatography A
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
1229
Pages
30-37
ISSN
0021-9673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980794612
Cited by
70
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chromatography A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Surfactants and Colloidal Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Keywords
parabens, methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, preconcentration, cation-π interactions, hydrogen bonding, solid-phase extraction comparison
MeSH terms
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Cosmetics, Decanoic Acids, Models, Chemical, Models, Molecular, Parabens, Sewage, Sodium Chloride, Surface-Active Agents, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Reproducibility of Results, Rivers, Solid Phase Microextraction, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions, Drinking Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review