Structuring group decision making in a web-based environment by using the nominal group technique
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The modified Nominal Group Technique will take place online.
“Our modified NGT will take place online [89], with expert ratings given via Qualtrics [90] and the discussion hosted on an online forum called ‘Loomio’ [91].”
Cites
Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554 · Cited by 9,868 · see citing works
Groups: Interaction and Performance.
Polley, R. B., & McGrath, J. E. (1984) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393041 · Cited by 3,268 · see citing works
Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes
(1976) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/002188637601200414 · Cited by 2,811 · see citing works
Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication
Sproull, L. S., & Kiesler, S. B. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492 · Cited by 2,377 · see citing works
Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems
Daft, R. L., Lengel, R. H., & Treviño, L. K. (1987) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248682 · Cited by 2,322 · see citing works
Effects of Anonymity and Evaluative Tone on Idea Generation in Computer-Mediated Groups
Connolly, T., Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. S. (1990) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.6.689 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Idea Generation in Groups: A Basis for Creativity in Organizations
Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H.-C. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2888 · Cited by 834 · see citing works
Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity
Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (2003) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.1109/hicss.1999.772701 · Cited by 820 · see citing works
Information Technology to Support Electronic Meetings
Dennis, A. R., George, J. F., Jessup, L., Nunamaker, J. F., & Vogel, D. (1988) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249135 · Cited by 798 · see citing works
Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S. B., & Sethna, B. N. (1991) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0602_2 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect.
Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.392 · Cited by 730 · see citing works
Organizations and Communication Technology
Fulk, J. L., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483325385 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea‐generating Groups
Paulus, P. (2000) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00013 · Cited by 679 · see citing works
Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration
Poole, M. S., & Desanctis, G. L. (1990) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483325385.n8 · Cited by 659 · see citing works
Computer-Mediated Communication and Group Decision Making: A Meta-Analysis
Baltes, B. B., Dickson, M. W., Sherman, M. P., Bauer, C. C., & LaGanke, J. S. (2002) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2001.2961 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Intelligibility and Accountability: Human Considerations in Context-Aware Systems
Bellotti, V., & Edwards, K. (2001) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci16234_05 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
The Effects of Anonymity on GDSS Group Process With an Idea-Generating Task
Jessup, L. M., Connolly, T., & Galegher, J. (1990) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248893 · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Benbasat, I., & Lim, L. H. (1993) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496493244002 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Divided attention and indirect memory tests
Mulligan, N. W., & Hartman, M. (1996) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03200934 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
A test of task-technology fit theory for group support systems
Zigurs, I., Buckland, B. K., Connolly, J. R., & Wilson, E. V. (1999) · ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems · doi:10.1145/344241.344244 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication
Adrianson, L., & Hjelmquist, E. (1991) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/01449299108924290 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
The impact of computer-mediated communication systems on biased group discussion
Hightower, R., & Sayeed, L. (1995) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/0747-5632(94)00019-e · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Social processes and group decision making: anonymity in group decision support systems
Postmes, T., & Lea, M. (2000) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130050084978 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Wilson, F. R., Genco, K. T., & Yager, G. G. (1985) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/0747-5632(85)90017-2 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Acceptability and Reliability of Sensitive Information Collected via Computer Interview
Millstein, S. G. (1987) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164487472028 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Psychological Testing by Computer: Effect On Response Bias
Koson, D., Kitchen, C., Kochen, M., & Stodolosky, D. (1970) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/001316447003000403 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
The effects of computer administration and identification on the Job Descriptive Index (JDI)
Kantor, J. (1991) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf01017705 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Attitude Assessment in Organizations: Testing Three Microcomputer-Based Survey Systems
Rosenfeld, P., Doherty, L. M., Vicino, S. M., et al. (1989) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.1989.9711119 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Michie, S., Carey, R. N., Johnston, M., Rothman, A. J., de Bruin, M., Kelly, M. P., & Connell, L. E. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-016-9816-6 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lago, P. P., Beruvides, M. G., Jian, J.-Y., Canto, A. M., Sandoval, A., & Taraban, R.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Stevens Institute of Technology (US)
- Instituto Tecnológico de Mérida (MX)
- AT&T (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Beruvides, Mario G.
- Venue
- Computers & Industrial Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 277-295
- ISSN
- 0360-8352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062175870
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Industrial Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- nominal group technique, group decision making, web-based decision support, interface design, idea generation, problem solving, perceived value
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
