The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Placing the operator at the centre of Industry 4.0 design: Modelling and assessing human activities within cyber-physical systems
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The Industry 4.0 vision, grounded on the integration of key technologies and Cyber-Physical-Systems (CPSs), is expected to profoundly modify the manufacturing sector. There is large consensus on the fact that work will change and different skills will be needed. However, whether the organization of work will evolve towards higher responsibility and decision-making of the employees or towards higher technological control is still an open question. The challenge is how to govern this evolution and purposely guide the process of integrating people within CPSs in order to move towards the desired scenario. This paper addresses this challenge, by proposing a methodology to support the design and assessment of different work configurations, jointly considering the uniqueness of human labour and the characteristics of cyber-physical production within a comprehensive framework. The method covers ordinary production as well as irregular scenarios, such as failure detection or maintenance intervention, particularly interesting for human work. The applicability of the method is illustrated through two industrial cases, leading to suggestions for training the personnel and for enhancing the whole cyber- physical-social system. Results include human-centric Key Performance indicators (KPIs) and general guidelines for work design. The approach encourages managers and engineers to clarify their strategy for human resources; develops a multi-perspective awareness on the role of workers; fosters an early detection of possible misalignment between the high-level strategies and the technical interventions on the shop floor. The modelling, analysis and assessment technique developed aims at representing a first step towards formal and quantitative methods to support the design of human work integrated within cyber-physical-systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 · Cited by 8,727
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355303322552801 · Cited by 6,205
Rasmussen, J. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1983.6313160 · Cited by 3,434
The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration
Autor, D., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. (2001) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w8337 · Cited by 2,587
(1986) · North-Holland eBooks · Cited by 1,883
Human and Computer Control of Undersea Teleoperators
Sheridan, T. B., & Verplank, W. L. (1978) · doi:10.21236/ada057655 · Cited by 1,227
Cyber-physical Production Systems: Roots, Expectations and R&D Challenges
Monostori, L. (2014) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.115 · Cited by 1,215
Cognitive Systems Engineering: An Integrative Living Laboratory Framework
(2017) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315155401 · Cited by 1,193
“Industrie 4.0” and Smart Manufacturing – A Review of Research Issues and Application Examples
Thoben, K.-D., BIBA – Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH, T. U. O. B., Wiesner, S., Wuest, T., Faculty of Production Engineering, U. O. B., & Industrial and Management Systems Engineering (2017) · International Journal of Automation Technology · doi:10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004 · Cited by 1,133
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-2769 · Cited by 993
Cited by
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542 · Cited by 2,753
Sima, V., Gheorghe, I. G., Subić, J., & Nancu, D. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12104035 · Cited by 786
Toward human-centric smart manufacturing: A human-cyber-physical systems (HCPS) perspective
Wang, B., Zheng, P., Yin, Y., Shih, A., & Wang, L. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.05.005 · Cited by 365
Proposed managerial competencies for Industry 4.0 – Implications for social sustainability
Shet, S. V., & Pereira, V. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121080 · Cited by 205
Systematic Literature Review of Industry 4.0 Maturity Model for Manufacturing and Logistics Sectors
Angreani, L. S., Vijaya, A., & Wicaksono, H. (2020) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.11.056 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Fantini, P., Pinzone, M., & Taisch, M.
- Venue
- Computers & Industrial Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 139
- Pages
- 105058
- ISSN
- 0360-8352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2790113577
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 23.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Placing the operator at the centre of Industry 4.0 design: Modelling and assessing human activities within cyber-physical systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.025
- The paper
- Fantini, P., Pinzone, M., & Taisch, M. (2020). Placing the operator at the centre of Industry 4.0 design: Modelling and assessing human activities within cyber-physical systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.01.025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.