The DOI matches its Crossref record; 194 of the 196 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous maintenance and the future – Foundations and technological challenges
Open accessAbstract
High value and long life products require continuous maintenance throughout their life cycle to achieve required performance with optimum through-life cost. This paper presents foundations and technologies required to offer the maintenance service. Component and system level degradation science, assessment and modelling along with life cycle ‘big data’ analytics are the two most important knowledge and skill base required for the continuous maintenance. Advanced computing and visualisation technologies will improve efficiency of the maintenance and reduce through-life cost of the product. Future of continuous maintenance within the Industry 4.0 context also identifies the role of IoT, standards and cyber security.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is also important in the context of the CE [107] as CE-I4.0 integration will require a focus on innovative activities, as well as emerging digital technologies [120].”
From Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends (2018) · cites this paper as [120]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review
Frazier, W. E. (2014) · Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance · doi:10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z · Cited by 5,984
Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics
Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.10.007 · Cited by 4,226
Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges
Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., Pellegrini, F. D., & Imrich Chlamtac, A. (2012) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016 · Cited by 3,629
The rise of big data on cloud computing: Review and open research issues
Hashem, I. A. T., Yaqoob, I., Anuar, N. B., Mokhtar, S., Gani, A., & Ullah Khan, S. (2015) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2014.07.006 · Cited by 2,656
Integration of Cloud computing and Internet of Things: A survey
Alessio Botta, B., de Donato, W., Persico, V., & Pescapè, A. (2015) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2015.09.021 · Cited by 2,395
A head-mounted three dimensional display
Sutherland, I. E. (1968) · Proceedings of the December 9-11, 1968, fall joint computer conference, part I on - AFIPS '68 (Fall, part I) · doi:10.1145/1476589.1476686 · Cited by 2,065
Lee, J., Wu, F., Zhao, W., Ghaffari, M., Liao, L., & Siegel, D. (2013) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.004 · Cited by 1,723
The Internet of Things vision: Key features, applications and open issues
Borgia, E. (2014) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2014.09.008 · Cited by 1,496
Levy, G. N., Schindel, R., & Kruth, J. (2003) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60206-6 · Cited by 1,150
Industrial Product-Service Systems—IPS 2
Meier, H., Roy, R., & Seliger, G. (2010) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.004 · Cited by 994
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Harrington, 2015, Biological Archetypes for Self-Healing, Materials, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Internet of things and supply chain management: A literature review
Ben-Daya, M., Hassini, E., & Bahroun, Z. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1402140 · Cited by 1,501
Predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review
Zonta, T., da Costa, C. A., Righi, R. D. R., de Lima, M. J., da Trindade, E. S., & Li, G. P. (2020) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106889 · Cited by 1,322
Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering
Schleich, B., Anwer, N., Mathieu, L., & Wartzack, S. (2017) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.040 · Cited by 1,305
Zheng, T., Ardolino, M., Bacchetti, A., & Perona, M. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1824085 · Cited by 744
Toward a Digital Twin for real-time geometry assurance in individualized production
Söderberg, R., Wärmefjord, K., Carlson, J. S., & Lindkvist, L. (2017) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.038 · Cited by 543
Digital Twins: State of the art theory and practice, challenges, and open research questions
Sharma, A., Kosasih, E., Zhang, J., Brintrup, A., & Calinescu, A. (2022) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2022.100383 · Cited by 587
Industry 4.0: A bibliometric analysis and detailed overview
Muhuri, P. K., Shukla, A. K., & Abraham, A. (2018) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2018.11.007 · Cited by 605
Cybersecurity for Industry 4.0 in the current literature: A reference framework
Lezzi, M., Lazoi, M., & Corallo, A. (2018) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2018.09.004 · Cited by 404
A review of emerging industry 4.0 technologies in remanufacturing
Kerin, M., & Pham, D. T. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117805 · Cited by 418
Industry 4.0 smart reconfigurable manufacturing machines
Morgan, J., Halton, M., Qiao, Y., & Breslin, J. G. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.001 · Cited by 336
Maintenance transformation through Industry 4.0 technologies: A systematic literature review
Silvestri, L., Forcina, A., Introna, V., Santolamazza, A., & Cesarotti, V. (2020) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103335 · Cited by 336
Digitisation and the Circular Economy: A Review of Current Research and Future Trends
Okorie, O., Salonitis, K., Charnley, F., Moreno, M., Turner, C., & Tiwari, A. (2018) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en11113009 · Cited by 283
Maintenance in digitalised manufacturing: Delphi-based scenarios for 2030
Bokrantz, J., Skoogh, A., Berlin, C., & Stahre, J. (2017) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.010 · Cited by 272
Scopus scientific mapping production in industry 4.0 (2011–2018): a bibliometric analysis
Kipper, L. M., Furstenau, L. B., Hoppe, D. A., Frozza, R., & Iepsen, S. E. L. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1671625 · Cited by 295
Nara, E. O. B., da Costa, M. B., Baierle, I. C., Schaefer, J. L., Benitez, G. B., do Santos, L. M. A. L., & Benitez, L. B. (2020) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.018 · Cited by 253
Estimating Industry 4.0 impact on job profiles and skills using text mining
Fareri, S., Fantoni, G., Chiarello, F., Coli, E., & Binda, A. (2020) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2020.103222 · Cited by 235
Fernández del Amo, I., Erkoyuncu, J. A., Roy, R., Palmarini, R., & Onoufriou, D. (2018) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2018.08.007 · Cited by 234
Self-citationIndustry 4.0 as a data-driven paradigm: a systematic literature review on technologies
Klingenberg, C. O., Borges, M. A. V., & Antunes, J. A. V. (2019) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-09-2018-0325 · Cited by 256
A big data driven sustainable manufacturing framework for condition-based maintenance prediction
Kumar, A., Shankar, R., & Thakur, L. S. (2017) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2017.06.006 · Cited by 195
Circular Strategies Enabled by the Internet of Things—A Framework and Analysis of Current Practice
Ingemarsdotter, E., Jamsin, E., Kortuem, G., & Balkenende, R. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11205689 · Cited by 215
Maintenance 4.0 Technologies for Sustainable Manufacturing - an Overview
Jasiulewicz–Kaczmarek, M., & Gola, A. (2019) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.10.005 · Cited by 175
Smart Maintenance: an empirically grounded conceptualization
Bokrantz, J., Skoogh, A., Berlin, C., Wuest, T., & Stahre, J. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107534 · Cited by 201
Development capabilities for smart products
Tomiyama, T., Lutters, E., Stark, R., & Abramovici, M. (2019) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2019.05.010 · Cited by 179
Self-citationBasic research on machinery fault diagnostics: Past, present, and future trends
Chen, X., Wang, S., Qiao, B., & Chen, Q. (2017) · Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11465-018-0472-3 · Cited by 162
Digital Twins in Product Lifecycle for Sustainability in Manufacturing and Maintenance
Rojek, I., Mikołajewski, D., & Dostatni, E. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app11010031 · Cited by 166
Maintenance for Sustainability in the Industry 4.0 context: a Scoping Literature Review
Franciosi, C., Iung, B., Miranda, S., & Riemma, S. (2018) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.459 · Cited by 159
Smart Maintenance: a research agenda for industrial maintenance management
Bokrantz, J., Skoogh, A., Berlin, C., Wuest, T., & Stahre, J. (2019) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107547 · Cited by 186
Cui, Y., Liu, W., Rani, P., & Alrasheedi, M. A. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120951 · Cited by 145
A procedural approach for realizing prescriptive maintenance planning in manufacturing industries
Matyas, K., Nemeth, T., Kovács, K., & Glawar, R. (2017) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.007 · Cited by 126
Data-driven failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to enhance maintenance planning
Filz, M.-A., Langner, J. E. B., Herrmann, C. A., & Thiede, S. (2021) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2021.103451 · Cited by 126
Saniuk, S., Cagáňová, D., & Saniuk, A. (2021) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-021-01788-4 · Cited by 124
Implementing circular economy activities in manufacturing for environmental sustainability
Sakao, T., Bocken, N. M. P., Nasr, N., & Umeda, Y. (2024) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2024.06.002 · Cited by 142
Tirabeni, L., Bernardi, P. D., Forliano, C., & Franco, M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11226363 · Cited by 119
Data mining in battery production chains towards multi-criterial quality prediction
Thiede, S., Turetskyy, A., Kwade, A., Kara, S., & Herrmann, C. A. (2019) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.066 · Cited by 110
Erkoyuncu, J. A., del Amo, I. F., Mura, M. D., Roy, R., & Dini, G. (2017) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.006 · Cited by 99
Self-citationDesigning value-driven solutions: The evolution of industrial product-service systems
Brissaud, D., Sakao, T., Riel, A., & Erkoyuncu, J. A. (2022) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2022.05.006 · Cited by 107
A comprehensive survey of ubiquitous manufacturing research
Wang, X., Ong, S. K., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2017) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1413259 · Cited by 91
Bad Smell Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review
Al-Shaaby, A., Aljamaan, H., & Alshayeb, M. (2020) · Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s13369-019-04311-w · Cited by 89
Approaches and Challenges in Product Disassembly Planning for Sustainability
Chang, M. M. L., Ong, S. K., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2017) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2017.01.013 · Cited by 82
Nemeth, T., Ansari, F., Sihn, W., Haslhofer, B., & Schindler, A. (2018) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.280 · Cited by 77
Intelligent decision support for maintenance: an overview and future trends
Turner, C. J., Emmanouilidis, C., Tomiyama, T., Tiwari, A., & Roy, R. (2019) · International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1080/0951192x.2019.1667033 · Cited by 75
Self-citationRECLAIM: Toward a New Era of Refurbishment and Remanufacturing of Industrial Equipment
Zacharaki, A., Vafeiadis, T., Kolokas, N., Vaxevani, A., Xu, Y.-C., Peschl, M., Ioannidis, D., & Tzovaras, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2020.570562 · Cited by 56
Jasiulewicz–Kaczmarek, M., Antosz, K., Wyczółkowski, R., Mazurkiewicz, D., Sun, B., Qian, C., & Ren, Y. (2021) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en14051436 · Cited by 68
Piron, M., Wu, J., Fedele, A., & Manzardo, A. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170263 · Cited by 69
Shifting value stream patterns along the product lifecycle with digital twins
Schleich, B., Dittrich, M., Clausmeyer, T., Damgrave, R., Erkoyuncu, J., Haefner, B., Lange, J. D., Plakhotnik, D., Scheidel, W., & Wuest, T. (2019) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.049 · Cited by 56
Geometrical Variations Management 4.0: towards next Generation Geometry Assurance
Schleich, B., Wärmefjord, K., Söderberg, R., & Wartzack, S. (2018) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.078 · Cited by 63
Zhao, Y., Mehnen, J., Sirikham, A., & Roy, R. (2016) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.08.033 · Cited by 56
Self-citationIndustry 4.0 and human factor: How is technology changing the role of the maintenance operator?
Gallo, T., & Santolamazza, A. (2021) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.364 · Cited by 58
A quantitative framework for Industry 4.0 enabled Circular Economy
Spaltini, M., Poletti, A., Acerbi, F., & Taisch, M. (2021) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.015 · Cited by 55
Maintenance – identification and analysis of the competency gap
Antosz, K. (2018) · Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability · doi:10.17531/ein.2018.3.19 · Cited by 53
Jasiulewicz–Kaczmarek, M., & Żywica, P. (2018) · Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc - Maintenance and Reliability · doi:10.17531/ein.2018.4.16 · Cited by 52
On Digital Twin Condition Monitoring Approach for Drivetrains in Marine Applications
Johansen, S., & Nejad, A. (2019) · Volume 10: Ocean Renewable Energy · doi:10.1115/omae2019-95152 · Cited by 42
Taxonomy of Industry 4.0 research: Mapping scholarship and industry insights
Nazarov, D., & Klarin, A. (2020) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.2700 · Cited by 39
Building a Total Cost of Ownership model to support manufacturing asset lifecycle management
Roda, I., Macchi, M., & Albanese, S. (2019) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1625079 · Cited by 53
Data-driven machine criticality assessment – maintenance decision support for increased productivity
Gopalakrishnan, M., Subramaniyan, M., & Skoogh, A. (2020) · Production Planning & Control · doi:10.1080/09537287.2020.1817601 · Cited by 48
Digitalization for sustainable maintenance services: A systematic literature review
Karki, B. R., & Porras, J. (2021) · Digital Business · doi:10.1016/j.digbus.2021.100011 · Cited by 48
A framework for cost evaluation in product service system configuration
Shen, J., Erkoyuncu, J. A., Roy, R., & Wu, B. (2017) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1325528 · Cited by 47
Self-citationSmart maintenance: instrument development, content validation and an empirical pilot
Bokrantz, J., Skoogh, A., Berlin, C., & Stahre, J. (2020) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-11-2019-0746 · Cited by 46
Machine learning and AI for long-term fault prognosis in complex manufacturing systems
Bukkapatnam, S., Afrin, K., Dave, D., & Kumara, S. R. T. (2019) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2019.04.104 · Cited by 44
Abubakr, M., Hassan, M. A., Królczyk, G., Khanna, N., & Hegab, H. A. (2020) · CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology · doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.12.002 · Cited by 43
Generative mechanisms of AI implementation: A critical realist perspective on predictive maintenance
Stohr, A., Ollig, P., Keller, R., & Rieger, A. (2024) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2024.100503 · Cited by 45
Industry 4.0: tools and implementation
Sanghavi, D., Parikh, S., & Raj, S. A. (2019) · Management and Production Engineering Review · doi:10.24425/mper.2019.129593 · Cited by 42
Human-oriented maintenance and disassembly in sustainable manufacturing
Siew, C. Y., Chang, M. M. L., Ong, S. K., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2020) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106903 · Cited by 42
Lundgren, C., Berlin, C., Skoogh, A., & Källström, A. (2022) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2022.2101031 · Cited by 41
Benedetti, M., Bonfà, F., Introna, V., Santolamazza, A., & Ubertini, S. (2019) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en12203935 · Cited by 41
Huynh, K. T. (2019) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.007 · Cited by 38
Enabling technology for maintenance in a smart factory: A literature review
Forcina, A., Introna, V., & Silvestri, A. (2021) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.259 · Cited by 38
An Advanced Operation Mode with Product-Service System Using Lifecycle Big Data and Deep Learning
Ren, S., Zhang, Y., Sakao, T., Liu, Y., & Cai, R. (2021) · International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology · doi:10.1007/s40684-021-00354-3 · Cited by 39
Managing system obsolescence via multicriteria decision making
Adetunji, O., Bischoff, J. E., & Willy, C. J. (2018) · Systems Engineering · doi:10.1002/sys.21436 · Cited by 37
An overview of self-engineering systems
Brooks, S., & Roy, R. (2021) · Journal of Engineering Design · doi:10.1080/09544828.2021.1914323 · Cited by 38
Self-citationA strategy development process for Smart Maintenance implementation
Lundgren, C., Bokrantz, J., & Skoogh, A. (2021) · Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management · doi:10.1108/jmtm-06-2020-0222 · Cited by 37
Biologicalisation in manufacturing – Current state and future trends
Wegener, K., Damm, O., Harst, S., Ihlenfeldt, S., Monostori, L., Teti, R., Wertheim, R., & Byrne, G. (2023) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2023.05.005 · Cited by 38
Okita, T., Kawabata, T., Murayama, H., Nishino, N., & Aichi, M. (2019) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.048 · Cited by 35
A survey on new trends of digital twin technology for power systems
Moghadam, H. M., Foroozan, H., Gheisarnejad, M., & Khooban, M. (2021) · Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.3233/jifs-201885 · Cited by 36
Digital twins in healthcare: Applications, technologies, simulations, and future trends
Elaziz, M. A., Al‐qaness, M. A. A., Dahou, A., Al‐Betar, M. A., Mohamed, M. M., El‐Shinawi, M., Ali, A., & Ewees, A. A. (2024) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1559 · Cited by 37
Bousdekis, A., Lepenioti, K., Ntalaperas, D., Vergeti, D., Apostolou, D., & Boursinos, V. (2019) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20948-3_9 · Cited by 35
A generic asset model for implementing product digital twins in smart remanufacturing
Kerin, M., Pham, D. T., Huang, J., & Hadall, J. (2022) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-022-09295-w · Cited by 35
Machine criticality assessment for productivity improvement
Gopalakrishnan, M., Skoogh, A., Salonen, A., & Asp, M. (2019) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-03-2018-0091 · Cited by 38
Value-based contract for smart operation and maintenance service based on equitable entropy
Huang, F., Chen, J., Sun, L., Zhang, Y., & Yao, S. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1617450 · Cited by 34
del Amo, I. F., Erkoyuncu, J. A., Vrabič, R., Frayssinet, R., Reynel, C. V., & Roy, R. (2020) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2020.101096 · Cited by 34
Self-citationAugmented Virtuality for maintenance training simulation under various stress conditions
Neges, M., Adwernat, S., & Abramovici, M. (2018) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.01.024 · Cited by 34
Unsupervised Learning Based Diagnosis Model for Anomaly Detection of Motor Bearing with Current Data
Hiruta, T., Maki, K., Kato, T., & Umeda, Y. (2021) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.113 · Cited by 33
Text mining for AI enhanced failure detection and availability optimization in production systems
Ansari, F., Kohl, L., Giner, J., & Meier, H. (2021) · CIRP Annals · doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2021.04.045 · Cited by 33
Machine criticality based maintenance prioritization
Gopalakrishnan, M., & Skoogh, A. (2018) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/ijppm-07-2017-0168 · Cited by 32
Franciosi, C., Voisin, A., Miranda, S., & Iung, B. (2020) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.11.001 · Cited by 31
Carou, D., Rubio, E. M., de Agustina, B., & Marín, M. M. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.095 · Cited by 32
Wolfartsberger, J., Zenisek, J., & Wild, N. (2020) · Procedia Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.022 · Cited by 31
Factors influencing lean-sustainable maintenance using TISM approach
Ramiya, S., & Suresh, M. (2021) · International Journal of Systems Assurance Engineering and Management · doi:10.1007/s13198-021-01304-7 · Cited by 31
Integrating Industry 4.0 and 5.0 Innovations for Enhanced Energy Management Systems
Introna, V., Santolamazza, A., & Cesarotti, V. (2024) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en17051222 · Cited by 32
Nonlinear Squeezing Time-Frequency Transform and Application in Rotor Rub-Impact Fault Diagnosis
Wang, S., Yang, L., Chen, X., Tong, C., Ding, B., & Xiang, J. (2017) · Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.4036993 · Cited by 30
Industry 4.0: Latent Dirichlet Allocation and clustering based theme identification of bibliography
Janmaijaya, M., Shukla, A. K., Muhuri, P. K., & Abraham, A. (2021) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104280 · Cited by 31
Innovative smart scheduling and predictive maintenance techniques
Wang, J., & Gao, R. X. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-823657-4.00007-5 · Cited by 30
Maintenance 4.0: implementation challenges and its analysis
James, A. T., Kumar, G., Khan, A. Q., & Asjad, M. (2022) · International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management · doi:10.1108/ijqrm-04-2021-0097 · Cited by 30
Chang, F., Zhou, G., Xiao, X., Tian, C., & Zhang, C. (2018) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.09.043 · Cited by 28
Adoption patterns and performance implications of Smart Maintenance
Bokrantz, J., & Skoogh, A. (2022) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108746 · Cited by 28
Tsai, W.-H., Chu, P.-Y., & Lee, H.-L. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11030756 · Cited by 27
A Mapping Analysis of Maintenance in Industry 4.0
Nardo, M. D., Madonna, M., Addonizio, P., & Gallab, M. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research and Technology · doi:10.22201/icat.24486736e.2021.19.6.1460 · Cited by 28
Industrial Control via Application Containers: Migrating from Bare-Metal to IAAS
Hofer, F., Sehr, M. A., Iannopollo, A., Ugalde, I., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. L., & Russo, B. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science · doi:10.1109/cloudcom.2019.00021 · Cited by 27
Tran, L. V., Huynh, B. H., & Akhtar, H. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9224815 · Cited by 26
Jasiulewicz–Kaczmarek, M. (2018) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/400/6/062014 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, R., Stark, R., Tracht, K., Takata, S., & Mori, M.
- Affiliations
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GB)
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- University of Bremen (DE)
- Waseda University (JP)
- DMG Mori (Japan) (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Roy, R.
- Venue
- CIRP Annals
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 667-688
- ISSN
- 0007-8506 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2463378445
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 196
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 61.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- CIRP Annals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
- DepositOnce (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- CERES (Cranfield University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Technische Universität Berlin – Universitätsbibliothek (cc-by)
- Funders
- EPSRC
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Transportation Systems and Infrastructure
- Keywords
- degradation modeling, deterioration assessment, big data analytics, life cycle cost, maintenance services, Industry 4.0, Internet of Things, cybersecurity, maintenance standards, advanced computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
