Cited by 1,063Pickering emulsions and particle stabilizationMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesProteins in Food Systems

The role of particles in stabilising foams and emulsions

Hunter, Timothy N., Pugh, Robert J., Franks, George V., Jameson, Graeme J.·2008·Advances in Colloid and Interface Science

Abstract

The use of particles as foam and emulsion stabilising species, with or without surfactants, has received great interest in recent years. The majority of work has studied the effects of particles as stabilisers in emulsion systems, but recent successes has widened consideration into foams, where industries such as flotation and food processing have encountered the effects of particle stabilisation for many years. This review seeks to clarify studies into emulsions, highlighting new research in this area, and relate similarities and differences to foam systems. Past research has focused on defining the interaction mechanisms of stability, such as principles of attachment energies, particle-particle forces at the interface and changes to the interfilm, with a view to ascertain conditions giving optimum stability. Studied conditions include effects of particle contact angle, aggregation formations, concentration, size and interactions of other species (i.e. surfactant). Mechanisms can be complex, but overall the principle of particles creating a steric barrier to coalescence, is a straitforward basis of interaction. Much research in emulsions can be applied to foam systems, however evidence would suggest foam systems are under a number of additional constraints, and the stability 'window' for particles is smaller, in terms of size and contact angle ranges. Also, because of increased density differences and interfilm perturbations in foam systems, retardation of drainage is often as important to stability as inhibiting coalescence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cis.2007.07.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hunter, T. N., Pugh, R. J., Franks, G. V., & Jameson, G. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Institute for Surface Chemistry (SE)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Pugh, Robert J.
Venue
Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
137
Issue
2
Pages
57-81
ISSN
0001-8686 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965761122
Cited by
1,063
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 48
FWCI
13.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Colloid and Interface Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
foam stability, emulsion stability, surfactants, steric barrier, particle aggregation, interfacial forces, flotation, food processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review