Cited by 294Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchFluorine in Organic ChemistryToxic Organic Pollutants Impact

Per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFASs): Environmental challenges

Krafft, Marie Pierre, Riess, Jean G.·2015·Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cocis.2015.07.004

Cites

401 of 401 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 403 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krafft, M. P., & Riess, J. G.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Krafft, Marie Pierre
Venue
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
192-212
ISSN
1359-0294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2210333450
Cited by
294
References
403
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, perfluorinated carboxylic acids, environmental persistence, bioaccumulation, toxicity, human exposure, risk assessment, processing aids, fluorinated surfactants, fluorinated polymers, risk management, developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review