CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 99Housing Market and EconomicsChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

Access to homeownership in urban China: A comparison between skilled migrants and skilled locals in Nanjing

Open access
Cui, Can, Geertman, Stan, Hooimeijer, Pieter·2016·Cities
DOI 10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.008

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Females in China receive less intergenerational transfers than males.

    “An often overlooked reason for women to own less housing property lies in the fact that females receive less intergenerational transfers than males (see also Cui etal. 2016).”

    From Why women own less housing assets in China? The role of intergenerational transfers (2019) · cites this paper as Cui et al. 2016

    The Descriptive analysis (§5.1, page not provided) reports fewer homeowners among single females than among single males. It discusses family support by migrant status, not by gender, so it does not establish that females receive less intergenerational transfers than males or that this explains the ownership difference. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Baxter, J., & McDonald, P. (2004). Home ownership among young people in Australia: In de- cline or just delayed? Paper prepared for the NLC Workshop, university of Queensland, 29-30 June.
  2. Liang, B. (2013). Housing inequality under market transition in urban China: Evidence from the 2005 mini census. The University of Utah: Doctoral dissertation.
  3. Mayer, C.J., & Engelhardt, G.V. (1996). Gifts, down payments, and housing affordability. Journal of Housing Research, 7(1), 59-77.
  4. Wang, C.G. (2010). Study on social integration of new generation migrant workers in cit- ies. Population Research, 34(2), 31-34 (in Chinese).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Cui, C., Geertman, S., & Hooimeijer, P.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Cui, Can
ORCID
Venue
Cities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
50
Pages
188-196
ISSN
0264-2751 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.008
OpenAlex
W1879921880
Cited by
99
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5
FWCI
17.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Cities (publishedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Housing Market and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Keywords
homeownership, skilled migrants, urban migration, housing market, Nanjing, life course, intergenerational wealth transfer, assimilation, housing finance, marriage timing, financial resources, Chinese cities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review