The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Citizen Design Science: A strategy for crowd-creative urban design
Open accessAbstract
The last decades in urban design research are characterised by a focus on technological aspects of cities which is commonly known as the smart city strategy. The concerns and interests of citizens are coming to the forefront nowadays with the awareness that a liveable city does not only consist of good infrastructure and sustainable energy supply but also citizen input and feedback. In this paper, we present Citizen Design Science as a new strategy for cities to integrate citizens' ideas and wishes in the urban planning process. The approach is to combine the opportunity of crowdsourcing opinions and thoughts by citizens through modern information and communication technology (ICT) with active design tools. The active design feedback from a city's inhabitants is identified as a yet missing but essential way towards a responsive city. We therefore propose a system to merge Citizen Science and Citizen Design, which requires a structured evaluation process to integrate Design Science methods for urban design. We show examples of existing approaches of Citizen Design Science and present the Quick Urban Analysis Kit (qua-kit) as an application of this methodology. The toolkit allows users to move geometries in given environments and provides the opportunity for non-experts to express their ideas for their neighbourhood or city.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Co-creation and the new landscapes of design
Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710880701875068 · Cited by 5,561
Concept of Interactive Machine Learning in Urban Design Problems
Chirkin, A. M., & König, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the SEACHI 2016 on Smart Cities for Better Living with HCI and UX · doi:10.1145/2898365.2899795 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Cited by
Smart Infrastructure: A Vision for the Role of the Civil Engineering Profession in Smart Cities
Berglund, E. Z., Monroe, J. G., Ahmed, I., Noghabaei, M., Do, J., Pesantez, J. E., Khaksar Fasaee, M. A., Bardaka, E., Han, K., Proestos, G. T., et al. (2020) · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · doi:10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000549 · Cited by 185
Smart governance in institutional context: an in-depth analysis of Glasgow, Utrecht, and Curitiba
Tomor, Z., Przeybilovicz, E., & Leleux, C. (2021) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103195 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Mueller, J., Lu, H., Chirkin, A., Klein, B., & Schmitt, G.
- Venue
- Cities
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 181-188
- ISSN
- 0264-2751 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2753903507
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Citizen Design Science: A strategy for crowd-creative urban design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.018
- The paper
- Mueller, J., Lu, H., Chirkin, A., Klein, B., & Schmitt, G. (2018). Citizen Design Science: A strategy for crowd-creative urban design. Cities. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.