Viewpoints: Improving cities' implementation of sustainability objectives
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Integrating embodied carbon with existing practices builds on evidence for strategies to buttress capacity including building relationships between departments, involving practitioners as local experts, building intermunicipal linkages, engaging with city networks, and relying on proxy data.
“Integrating embodied carbon with existing practices builds on evidence for strategies to buttress capacity including building relationships between departments, involving practitioners as local experts, building intermunicipal linkages, engaging with city networks, and relying on proxy data (Alm et al. 2021;Caldwell et al. 2021;Krause and Hawkins 2021;Lesnikowski et al. 2021;Oke et al. 2022).”
From Making embodied carbon mainstream: a framework for cities to leverage waste, equity, and preservation policy to reduce embodied emissions in buildings (2023) · cites this paper as Krause and Hawkins 2021
These strategies are ripe for greater uptake by local governments through mechanisms that have been shown to enhance sustainability capacity such as building relationships between departments, involving practitioners as local experts, building intermunicipal linkages, engaging with city networks, and relying on proxy data.
“These strategies are ripe for greater uptake by local governments through mechanisms that have been shown to enhance sustainability capacity such as building relationships between departments, involving practitioners as local experts, building intermunicipal linkages, engaging with city networks, and relying on proxy data (Alm et al. 2021;Caldwell et al. 2021;Krause and Hawkins 2021;Lesnikowski et”
From Making embodied carbon mainstream: a framework for cities to leverage waste, equity, and preservation policy to reduce embodied emissions in buildings (2023) · cites this paper as Krause and Hawkins 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teicher, H. M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-023-00836-7 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Krause, R. M., & Hawkins, C. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas (US)
- University of Central Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Krause, Rachel M.
- Venue
- Cities
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 113
- Pages
- 103167
- ISSN
- 0264-2751 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3134113245
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 274 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Cities (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation Division of Administrative Services
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Local Governance and Planning
- Keywords
- urban sustainability, sustainability policy implementation, local government, organizational structure, inter-agency cooperation, cross-border governance, administration arrangement, American cities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review