Cited by 25Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionSodium Intake and Health

The Impact of Cardiovascular Risk-Factor Profiles on Blood Pressure Control Rates in Adults From Canada and the United States

Open access
McAlister, Finlay A., Robitaille, Cynthia, Gillespie, Cathleen, Yuan, Keming, Rao, Deepa P., Grover, Steven, Dai, Sulan, Johansen, Helen +3 more·2013·Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background It is unclear whether blood pressure control varies across the spectrum of atherosclerotic risk.Methods We used data from nonpregnant adults who had fasted laboratory samples drawn for the 2007-2009 cycle of the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) or the 2005-2008 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).Results The 1692 CHMS subjects and 3541 NHANES participants were demographically similar (aged a mean of 45 years), although NHANES participants exhibited higher obesity rates (33.8% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.001). Over 80% of CHMS and NHANES subjects with hypertension had at least 1 other cardiovascular risk factor. As the number of atherosclerotic risk factors increased, hypertension prevalence increased, but blood pressure control rates improved (from 48% among hypertensives with no other risk factors in CHMS to 77% among those with 3 or more risk factors, and from 35% to 53% in NHANES). However, the converse was not true: The distribution of Framingham risk scores for those subjects with "controlled hypertension" was nearly identical to the distribution among those adults with uncontrolled hypertension in both CHMS and NHANES and substantially higher than scores in normotensive subjects.Conclusions Although control of blood pressure was better in patients with multiple atherosclerotic risk factors, hypertensives with controlled blood pressures exhibited risk-factor profiles similar to those of participants with uncontrolled blood pressures. This suggests the need, in educational messaging and therapy decision making, for an increased focus on total atherosclerotic risk rather than just blood pressure control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.12.004

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the United States, Canada, and Finland, over 80% of people with hypertension have other cardiovascular risks and/or evidence of blood pressure-related damage (heart disease, stroke, and/or kidney damage).

    “In the United States, Canada, and Finland, over 80% of people with hypertension have other cardiovascular risks and/or evidence of blood pressure-related damage (heart disease, stroke, and/or kidney damage).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11]Centers for Disease Control and Prevension . National Health and Nutrition Examination survey data. US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; Hyattsville, MD: [Accessed December 2, 2011]. 2010. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm. [Google Scholar]
  2. [18]MacDonald S, Joffres MR, Stachenko S, Horlick L, Fodor G. Multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors in Canadian adults. CMAJ. 1992;146:2021–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McAlister, F. A., Robitaille, C., Gillespie, C., Yuan, K., Rao, D. P., Grover, S., Dai, S., Johansen, H., Joffres, M., Loustalot, F., & Campbell, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Public Health Agency of Canada (CA)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
McAlister, Finlay A.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
598-605
ISSN
0828-282X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051696650
Cited by
25
References
35
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Public Health Agency of Canada
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
Keywords
blood pressure control, hypertension, cardiovascular risk factors, atherosclerosis risk, Framingham risk score, multiple risk factors, hypertension prevalence, Canadian Health Measures Survey, NHANES, obesity
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Canada, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Obesity, Risk Factors, United States, Prevalence, Atherosclerosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review