Cited by 42GDF15 and Related BiomarkersHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling

The Role of GDF-15 in Heart Failure Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Benes, Jan, Kotrc, Martin, Wohlfahrt, Peter, Conrad, Michael J., Franekova, Janka, Jabor, Antonin, Lupinek, Petr, Kautzner, Josef +2 more·2019·Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Background Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is a stress-inducible cytokine and member of the transforming growth factor-β cytokine superfamily that refines prognostic assessment in subgroups of patients with heart failure (HF). We evaluated its role in HF patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD, estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m 2).Methods A total of 358 patients with stable systolic HF were followed for a median of 1121 (interquartile range, 379-2600) days. Comprehensive evaluation including B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and GDF-15 testing was performed at study entry; the analysis was stratified according to kidney function.Results Patients with CKD (33.8%) were older, had more often diabetes, and were less often treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB). GDF-15 was associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate, whereas BNP was associated with left ventricular-end diastolic diameter and ejection fraction (P < 0.01). During follow-up, 244 patients (68.2%) experienced an adverse outcome (death, urgent transplantation, implantation of mechanical circulatory support). In patients with HF and CKD, the Cox proportional hazard model identified BNP, GDF-15, sex, systolic blood pressure, sodium, total cholesterol, and ACEi/ARB treatment as significant variables associated with an adverse outcome (P < 0.05). In multivariable analysis, BNP was replaced by GDF-15. Net reclassification improvement confirmed prognostic superiority of the model encompassing GDF-15 (GDF-15, sodium, total cholesterol, ACEi/ARB treatment) compared with the model without GDF-15 (BNP, sex, sodium, ACEi/ARB treatment), net reclassification improvement 0.62, P = 0.005. In contrast, in patients with HF and normal kidney function, BNP remained superior to GDF-15 in a multivariable model.Conclusions In patients with systolic HF and CKD, GDF-15 is more strongly associated with adverse outcomes than the conventionally used BNP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.12.027

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Elevated circulating GDF-15 levels are associated with more severe disease or higher mortality in people with DM2, insulin resistance, hemodialysis, cachexia, cardiovascular diseases, COPD, VTE, cancer, or obesity.

    “Elevated circulating GDF-15 levels have been associated with more severe disease or higher mortality in people with DM2, insulin resistance, hemodialysis, cachexia, cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), venous thromboembolism (VTE), cancer, or obesity (28–34).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benes, J., Kotrc, M., Wohlfahrt, P., Conrad, M. J., Franekova, J., Jabor, A., Lupinek, P., Kautzner, J., Melenovsky, V., & Jarolim, P.
Affiliations
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CZ)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
462-470
ISSN
0828-282X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2906550469
Cited by
42
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Health (IN 00023001, 17-28784A)
  • Czech Republic (15-14200)
  • Biomarker Research and Clinical Trials Laboratory (103517)
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Amgen
  • AstraZeneca LP
  • Beckman Coulter
  • Daiichi Sankyo
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Merck
  • Roche Diagnostics Corporation
  • Takeda Global Research and Development Center
  • Waters Technologies Corporation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › GDF15 and Related Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
Keywords
growth differentiation factor 15, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, chronic kidney disease, brain natriuretic peptide, prognostic factors, adverse outcomes, ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers, net reclassification improvement, estimated glomerular filtration rate
MeSH terms
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Blood Pressure, Cholesterol, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Heart-Assist Devices, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Sodium, Systole, Biomarkers, Proportional Hazards Models, Heart Transplantation, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Heart Failure, Systolic, Growth Differentiation Factor 15, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review