Cited by 103Ocular Surface and Contact LensFatty Acid Research and HealthErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders

Oral omega-3 fatty acids treatment in computer vision syndrome related dry eye

Bhargava, Rahul, Kumar, Prachi, Phogat, Hemant, Kaur, Avinash, Kumar, Manjushri·2015·Contact Lens and Anterior Eye

Abstract

Purpose To assess the efficacy of dietary consumption of omega-3 fatty acids (O3FAs) on dry eye symptoms, Schirmer test, tear film break up time (TBUT) and conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) in patients with computer vision syndrome. Setting and design Interventional, randomized, double blind, multi-centric study. Methods Four hundred and seventy eight symptomatic patients using computers for more than 3h per day for minimum 1 year were randomized into two groups: 220 patients received two capsules of omega-3 fatty acids each containing 180mg eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and 120mg docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) daily (O3FA group) and 236 patients received two capsules of a placebo containing olive oil daily for 3 months (placebo group). The primary outcome measure was improvement in dry eye symptoms and secondary outcome measures were improvement in Nelson grade and an increase in Schirmer and TBUT scores at 3 months. Results In the placebo group, before dietary intervention, the mean symptom score, Schirmer, TBUT and CIC scores were 7.5±2, 19.9±4.7mm, 11.5±2s and 1±0.9 respectively, and 3 months later were 6.8±2.2, 20.5±4.7mm, 12±2.2s and 0.9±0.9 respectively. In the O3FA group, these values were 8.0±2.6, 20.1±4.2mm, 11.7±1.6s and 1.2±0.8 before dietary intervention and 3.9±2.2, 21.4±4mm, 15±1.7s, 0.5±0.6 after 3 months of intervention, respectively. Conclusion This study demonstrates the beneficial effect of orally administered O3FAs in alleviating dry eye symptoms, decreasing tear evaporation rate and improving Nelson grade in patients suffering from computer vision syndrome related dry eye.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clae.2015.01.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aside from several large trials conducted in India by Bhargava et al., previous clinical trials involved fewer than 125 total patients.

    “Aside from several large trials that were conducted in India by Bhargava et al.,15–18 the previous clinical trials involved fewer than 125 total patients.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhargava, R., Kumar, P., Phogat, H., Kaur, A., & Kumar, M.
Affiliations
Santosh University (IN)
Corresponding author
Bhargava, Rahul
Venue
Contact Lens and Anterior Eye
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
206-210
ISSN
1367-0484 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105498002
Cited by
103
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
FWCI
11.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contact Lens and Anterior Eye (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, dry eye, computer vision syndrome, eicosapentaenoic acid, docosahexaenoic acid, Schirmer test, tear film break-up time, conjunctival impression cytology, dietary supplementation, tear film evaporation
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Computers, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Syndrome, Tears, Dry Eye Syndromes, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review