The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Comparison of reactive magnesia- and carbide slag-activated ground granulated blastfurnace slag and Portland cement for stabilisation of a natural soil
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 143
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- Al-Tabbaa, 2003, Soil mixing in the UK 1991–2001: state of practice report, Ground Improv., 7, 117, 10.1680/grim.2003.7.3.117 · DOI
- Al-Tabbaa, 2011, Soil mix technology for land remediation: recent innovations, Ground Improv., 164, 127, 10.1680/grim.2011.164.3.127 · DOI
- Bruce, 2001, Practitioner's guide to the deep mixing method, Ground Improv., 5, 95, 10.1680/grim.2001.5.3.95 · DOI
- Cardoso, 2009, Carbide lime and industrial hydrated lime characterization, Powder Technol., 195, 143, 10.1016/j.powtec.2009.05.017 · DOI
- Celik, 2013, Effects of ground granulated blastfurnace slag (GGBS) on the swelling properties of lime-stabilised sulfate-bearing soils, Eng. Geol., 163, 20, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.05.016 · DOI
- Higgins, 2007, GGBS and sustainability, Constr. Mater., 160, 99, 10.1680/coma.2007.160.3.99 · DOI · Paper page
- Hughes, 2004, Deep dry mix ground improvement of a soft peaty clay using blast furnace slag and red gypsum, Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol., 37, 205, 10.1144/1470-9236/04-003 · DOI
- Hughes, 2011, Use of red gypsum in soil mixing engineering applications, Geotech. Eng., 164, 223, 10.1680/geng.10.00061 · DOI
- Islam, 2014, Effects of curing environment on the strength and mineralogy of lime-GGBS-treated acid sulphate soils, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 26, 1003, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000887 · DOI
- Islam, 2014, Improvement of acid sulphate soils using lime activated slag, Ground Improv., 167, 235, 10.1680/grim.12.00033 · DOI
- James, 2008, Behaviour of lime-slag-treated clay, Ground Improv., 161, 207, 10.1680/grim.2008.161.4.207 · DOI
- Jegandan, 2010, Sustainable binders for soil stabilisation, Ground Improv., 163, 53, 10.1680/grim.2010.163.1.53 · DOI
- Kinuthia, 2012, Designed non-fired clay mixes for sustainable and low carbon use, Appl. Clay Sci., 59–60, 131, 10.1016/j.clay.2012.02.021 · DOI
- Nidzam, 2010, Sustainable soil stabilisation with blast furnace slag—a review, Constr. Mater., 163, 157, 10.1680/coma.2010.163.3.157 · DOI
- Obuzor, 2011, Enhancing the durability of flooded low-capacity soils by utilizing lime-activated ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS), Eng. Geol., 123, 179, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.07.009 · DOI
- Obuzor, 2011, Utilisation of lime activated GGBS to reduce the deleterious effect of flooding on stabilised road structural materials: a laboratory simulation, Eng. Geol., 122, 334, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.06.010 · DOI
- Obuzor, 2012, Soil stabilisation with lime-activated-GGBS—a mitigation to flooding effects on road structural layers/embankments constructed on floodplains, Eng. Geol., 151, 112, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.09.010 · DOI
- Osinubik, 2006, Influence of compacting efforts on lime-slag treated tropical black clay, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 18, 175, 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:2(175) · DOI
- Oti, 2008, Developing unfired stabilised building materials in the UK, Eng. Sustain., 161, 211, 10.1680/ensu.2008.161.4.211 · DOI
- Oti, 2008, Using slag for unfired clay masonry-bricks, Constr. Mater., 161, 147, 10.1680/coma.2008.161.4.147 · DOI
- Oti, 2009, Compressive strength and microstructural analysis of unfired clay masonry bricks, Eng. Geol., 109, 230, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.08.010 · DOI
- Oti, 2009, Engineering properties of unfired clay masonry bricks, Eng. Geol., 107, 130, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.05.002 · DOI
- Oti, 2009, Unfired clay bricks: from laboratory to industrial production, Eng. Sustain., 162, 229, 10.1680/ensu.2009.162.4.229 · DOI
- Oti, 2010, Unfired clay masonry bricks incorporating slate waste, Waste Resour. Manag., 163, 17
- Puppala, 2003, Experimental evaluations of stabilisation methods for sulfate-rich expansive soils, Ground Improv., 7, 25, 10.1680/grim.2003.7.1.25 · DOI
- Tasong, 1999, Mechanism by which ground granulated blast furnace slag prevents sulphate attack of lime-stabilised kaolinite, Cem. Concr. Res., 29, 975, 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00007-1 · DOI
- Terashi, 2011, QA/QC for deep-mixed ground: current practice and future research needs, Ground Improv., 164, 161, 10.1680/grim.2011.164.3.161 · DOI
- Wild, 1996, Effects of ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) on strength and swelling properties of lime stabilised kaolinite in the presence of sulphates, Clay Miner., 31, 423, 10.1180/claymin.1996.031.3.12 · DOI
- Wild, 1998, Effects of partial substitution of lime with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) on the strength properties of lime stabilised sulphate-bearing clay soils, Eng. Geol., 51, 37, 10.1016/S0013-7952(98)00039-8 · DOI
- Wild, 1999, Suppression of swelling associated with ettringite formation in lime stabilised sulphate bearing clay soils by partial substitution of lime with granulated blast furnace slag, Eng. Geol., 51, 257, 10.1016/S0013-7952(98)00069-6 · DOI
- Wilkinson, 2010, Stabilisation of clayey soils with industrial by-products: part A, Ground Improv., 163, 149, 10.1680/grim.2010.163.3.149 · DOI
- Wilkinson, 2010, Stabilisation of clayey soils with industrial by-products: part B, Ground Improv., 163, 165, 10.1680/grim.2010.163.3.165 · DOI
- Yi, 2014, Properties of two model soils stabilised with different blends and contents of GGBS, MgO, lime and PC, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 26, 267, 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000806 · DOI
- Yi, 2015, Microstructural and mechanical properties of marine soft clay stabilized by lime-activated ground granulated blastfurnace slag, Appl. Clay Sci., 103, 71, 10.1016/j.clay.2014.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Yi, Y., Zheng, X., Liu, S., & Al-Tabbaa, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Alberta (CA)
- Southeast University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yi, Yaolin
- Venue
- Applied Clay Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 111
- Pages
- 21-26
- ISSN
- 0169-1317 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072060927
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Applied Clay Science (publishedVersion)
- Apollo (University of Cambridge) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (41330641)
- Jiangsu Province (BY2014120)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
- Keywords
- ground granulated blast furnace slag, reactive magnesia, carbide slag, soil stabilization, Portland cement, hydration products, calcium silicate hydrate, calcium aluminate hydrate, ettringite, unconfined compressive strength, microstructure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review