Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase II Trial of Saracatinib (AZD0530), an Oral SRC-inhibitor for the Treatment of Patients with Hormone Receptor-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

Open access
Gucalp, Ayca, Sparano, Joseph A., Caravelli, James, Santamauro, Jean, Patil, Sujata, Abbruzzi, Alyson, Pellegrino, Christine, Bromberg, Jackie, Dang, Chau, Theodoulou, Maria, Massague, Joan, Norton, Larry, Hudis, Clifford, Traina, Tiffany A.·2011·Clinical Breast Cancer

Abstract

Background Src activation is associated with cell migration, proliferation and metastasis. Saracatinib is an oral, tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) selective for Src. We performed this trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of saracatinib monotherapy in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)- and progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with ≤1 prior chemotherapy regimen for measurable, ER- and PR-negative metastatic breast cancer received saracatinib 175 mg orally daily. The primary endpoint was disease control defined as complete response (CR) + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD) >6 months. Secondary endpoints included toxicity and progression-free survival. Levels of circulating tumor cells in response to therapy were measured over time. Results Nine patients were treated on study. After a median of 2 cycles (range 1–3), no patients achieved CR, PR, or SD >6 months. The median time to treatment failure was 82 days (12–109).The majority (89%) of patients discontinued saracatinib because of disease progression. One patient developed potentially treatment-related grade 4 hypoxia with interstitial infiltrates and was removed from study. Common adverse events included fatigue, elevated liver chemistries, nausea, hyponatremia, dyspnea, cough, and adrenal insufficiency. Conclusions These efficacy results were not sufficiently promising to justify continued accrual to this study. Based on this series, saracatinib does not appear to have significant single-agent activity for the treatment of patients with ER(−)/PR(−) metastatic breast cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clbc.2011.03.021

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Gucalp, A., Sparano, J. A., Caravelli, J., Santamauro, J., Patil, S., Abbruzzi, A., Pellegrino, C., Bromberg, J., Dang, C., Theodoulou, M., Massague, J., Norton, L., Hudis, C., & Traina, T. A.
Venue
Clinical Breast Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
306-311
ISSN
1526-8209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000596607
Cited by
159
References
4
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.