Cited by 62Prostate Cancer Treatment and ResearchCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research

Phase 1 Study of Safety and Preliminary Clinical Activity of JNJ-63898081, a PSMA and CD3 Bispecific Antibody, for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Open access
Lim, Emerson A., Schweizer, Michael T., Chi, Kim N., Aggarwal, Rahul, Agarwal, Neeraj, Gulley, James, Attiyeh, Edward, Greger, James +6 more·2023·Clinical Genitourinary Cancer

Abstract

Introduction Cancer immunotherapies have limited efficacy in prostate cancer due to the immunosuppressive prostate microenvironment. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression is prevalent in prostate cancer, preserved during malignant transformation, and increases in response to anti-androgen therapies, making it a commonly targeted tumor associated antigen for prostate cancer. JNJ-63898081 (JNJ-081) is a bispecific antibody targeting PSMA-expressing tumor cells and CD3-expressing T cells, aiming to overcome immunosuppression and promoting antitumor activity. Patients and methods We conducted a phase 1 dose escalation study of JNJ-081 in patients with metastatic castration-resistance prostate cancer (mCRPC). Eligible patients included those receiving ≥1 prior line treatment with either novel androgen receptor targeted therapy or taxane for mCRPC. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of JNJ-081, and preliminary antitumor response to treatment were evaluated. JNJ-081 was administered initially by intravenous (IV) then by subcutaneous (SC) route. Results Thirty-nine patients in 10 dosing cohorts received JNJ-081 ranging from 0.3 µg/kg to 3.0 µg/kg IV and 3.0 µg/kg to 60 µg/kg SC (with step-up priming used at higher SC doses). All 39 patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent AE, and no treatment-related deaths were reported. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 4 patients. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was observed at higher doses with JNJ-081 IV or SC; however, CRS and infusion-related reaction (IRR) were reduced with SC dosing and step-up priming at higher doses. Treatment doses >30 µg/kg SC led to transient PSA decreases. No radiographic responses were observed. Anti-drug antibody responses were observed in 19 patients receiving JNJ-081 IV or SC. Conclusion JNJ-081 dosing led to transient declines in PSA in patients with mCRPC. CRS and IRR could be partially mitigated by SC dosing, step-up priming, and a combination of both strategies. T cell redirection for prostate cancer is feasible and PSMA is a potential therapeutic target for T cell redirection in prostate cancer.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.02.010

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a 2023 phase 1 study of 39 patients, JNJ-081 produced a PSA50 response of 7.7%.

    “JNJ- 081, an alternate BiTE targeting PSMA, was studied in a 2023 phase 1 study of 39 patients and showed a PSA50 response of 7.7%.”

    From PSMA-based Therapies and Novel Therapies in Advanced Prostate Cancer: The Now and the Future (2025) · cites this paper as [29]

    The Abstract (Results) confirms that 39 patients received JNJ-081 in this phase 1 study. The Results (Efficacy; page unavailable) report confirmed PSA declines greater than 50% in two patients, not a 7.7% PSA50 response rate; two of 39 is approximately 5.1%. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Every patient in the JNJ-081 phase 1 study experienced at least one TE-AE, and 19 patients developed TE-ADAs, ultimately resulting in early discontinuation of the trial.

    “Every patient in the study experienced at least one TE-AE, with 19 patients developing TE-ADAs ultimately resulting in early discontinuation of the trial”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. [1]Akaza H, Procopio G, Pripatnanont C, Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy: Treatment Patterns From the PROXIMA Prospective Registry. J Glob Oncol. 2018; 4: 1– 12. PMC6223517 30260754
  2. [2]Facchini G, Caffo O, Ortega C, Very Early PSA Response to Abiraterone in mCRPC Patients: A Novel Prognostic Factor Predicting Overall Survival. Front Pharmacol. 2016; 7: 123. 27242530 PMC4870277
  3. [3]Lin TT, Chen YH, Wu YP, Risk factors for progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer in metastatic prostate cancer patients. J Cancer. 2019; 10: 5608– 5613. 31632505 PMC6775699
  4. [4]de Wit R, de Bono J, Sternberg CN, Cabazitaxel versus Abiraterone or Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381: 2506– 2518. 31566937
  5. [5]de Bono J, Mateo J, Fizazi K, Olaparib for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 2091– 2102. 32343890
  6. [6]Sayegh N, Swami U, Agarwal N. Recent Advances in the Management of Metastatic Prostate Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022; 18: 45– 55. 34473525
  7. [7]Crawford ED, Heidenreich A, Lawrentschuk N, Androgen-targeted therapy in men with prostate cancer: evolving practice and future considerations. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019; 22: 24– 38. 30131604 PMC6370592
  8. [8]Hansen AR, Massard C, Ott PA, Pembrolizumab for advanced prostate adenocarcinoma: findings of the KEYNOTE-028 study. Ann Oncol. 2018; 29: 1807– 1813. 29992241
  9. [9]Slovin SF, Higano CS, Hamid O, Ipilimumab alone or in combination with radiotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from an open-label, multicenter phase I/II study. Ann Oncol. 2013; 24: 1813– 1821. 23535954 PMC3707423
  10. [11]Boudadi K, Suzman DL, Anagnostou V, Ipilimumab plus nivolumab and DNA-repair defects in AR-V7-expressing metastatic prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2018; 9: 28561– 28571. 29983880 PMC6033362
  11. [12]Stultz J, Fong L. How to turn up the heat on the cold immune microenvironment of metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021; 24: 697– 717. 33820953 PMC8384622
  12. [13]Heitmann JS, Pfluegler M, Jung G, Salih HR. Bispecific Antibodies in Prostate Cancer Therapy: Current Status and Perspectives. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13. PMC7867165 33535627
  13. [14]Kinoshita Y, Kuratsukuri K, Landas S, Expression of prostate-specific membrane antigen in normal and malignant human tissues. World J Surg. 2006; 30: 628– 636. 16555021
  14. [15]Queisser A, Hagedorn SA, Braun M, Vogel W, Duensing S, Perner S. Comparison of different prostatic markers in lymph node and distant metastases of prostate cancer. Mod Pathol. 2015; 28: 138– 145. 24925052
  15. [16]Ross JS, Sheehan CE, Fisher HA, Correlation of primary tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen expression with disease recurrence in prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2003; 9: 6357– 6362. 14695135
  16. [17]Silver DA, Pellicer I, Fair WR, Heston WD, Cordon-Cardo C. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin Cancer Res. 1997; 3: 81– 85. 9815541
  17. [18]Wright GL Jr., Grob BM, Haley C, Upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen after androgen-deprivation therapy. Urology. 1996; 48: 326– 334. 8753752
  18. [19]Hernandez-Hoyos G, Sewell T, Bader R, MOR209/ES414, a Novel Bispecific Antibody Targeting PSMA for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016; 15: 2155– 2165. 27406985
  19. [20]Klinger M, Benjamin J, Kischel R, Stienen S, Zugmaier G. Harnessing T cells to fight cancer with BiTE(R) antibody constructs--past developments and future directions. Immunol Rev. 2016; 270: 193– 208. 26864113
  20. [21]Haber L, Olson K, Kelly MP, Generation of T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibodies with differentiated profiles of cytokine release and biodistribution by CD3 affinity tuning. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 14397. 34257348 PMC8277787
  21. [22]Klinger M, Brandl C, Zugmaier G, Immunopharmacologic response of patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia to continuous infusion of T cell-engaging CD19/CD3-bispecific BiTE antibody blinatumomab. Blood. 2012; 119: 6226– 6233. 22592608
  22. [23]Burt R, Warcel D, Fielding AK. Blinatumomab, a bispecific B-cell and T-cell engaging antibody, in the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019; 15: 594– 602. 30380973 PMC6605719
  23. [24]Budde LE, Sehn LH, Matasar M, Safety and efficacy of mosunetuzumab, a bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022; 23: 1055– 1065. 35803286
  24. [25]Hutchings M, Morschhauser F, Iacoboni G, Glofitamab, a Novel, Bivalent CD20-Targeting T-Cell-Engaging Bispecific Antibody, Induces Durable Complete Remissions in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Lymphoma: A Phase I Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021; 39: 1959– 1970. 33739857 PMC8210975
  25. [27]Verkleij CPM, Broekmans MEC, van Duin M, Preclinical activity and determinants of response of the GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody talquetamab in multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2021; 5: 2196– 2215. 33890981 PMC8095149
  26. [29]Beer TM, Kwon ED, Drake CG, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Trial of Ipilimumab Versus Placebo in Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Chemotherapy-Naive Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35: 40– 47. 28034081
  27. [30]Kwon ED, Drake CG, Scher HI, Ipilimumab versus placebo after radiotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer that had progressed after docetaxel chemotherapy (CA184–043): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15: 700– 712. 24831977 PMC4418935
  28. [31]Hummel HD, Kufer P, Grullich C, Pasotuxizumab, a BiTE((R)) immune therapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer: Phase I, dose-escalation study findings. Immunotherapy. 2021; 13: 125– 141. 33172323
  29. [32]Deegen P, Thomas O, Nolan-Stevaux O, The PSMA-targeting Half-life Extended BiTE Therapy AMG 160 has Potent Antitumor Activity in Preclinical Models of Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021; 27: 2928– 2937. 33504551
  30. [33]De Bono JS, Fong L Beer TM,. Results of an ongoing phase 1/2a dose escalation study of HPN424, a tri-specific half-life extended PSMA-targeting T-cell engager, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Journal of Clinical Oncology 39, no. 15_suppl (May 20, 2021) 5013..
  31. [34]Tran B, Horvath L, Rettig M, Phase I study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T-cell engager (HLE BiTE immune therapy) targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Journal of Clinical Oncology. 38, no. 15_suppl.
  32. [35]Yanez JA, Remsberg CM, Sayre CL, Forrest ML, Davies NM. Flip-flop pharmacokinetics--delivering a reversal of disposition: challenges and opportunities during drug development. Ther Deliv. 2011; 2: 643– 672. 21837267 PMC3152312
  33. [36]Chen X, Kamperschroer C, Wong G, Xuan D. A Modeling Framework to Characterize Cytokine Release upon T-Cell-Engaging Bispecific Antibody Treatment: Methodology and Opportunities. Clin Transl Sci. 2019; 12: 600– 608. 31268236 PMC6853151
  34. [37]Lee SC, Ma JSY, Kim MS, A PSMA-targeted bispecific antibody for prostate cancer driven by a small-molecule targeting ligand. Sci Adv. 2021; 7. PMC8357232 34380625
  35. [38]Jarvi NL, Balu-Iyer SV. Immunogenicity Challenges Associated with Subcutaneous Delivery of Therapeutic Proteins. BioDrugs. 2021; 35: 125– 146. 33523413 PMC7848667

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lim, E. A., Schweizer, M. T., Chi, K. N., Aggarwal, R., Agarwal, N., Gulley, J., Attiyeh, E., Greger, J., Wu, S., Jaiprasart, P., Loffredo, J., Bandyopadhyay, N., Xie, H., & Hansen, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • BC Cancer Agency (CA)
  • UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • Huntsman Cancer Institute (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Janssen Research & Development (United States) (US)
  • Queensland Health (AU)
Corresponding author
Hansen, Aaron R.
Venue
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
366-375
ISSN
1558-7673 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4328095977
Cited by
62
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 1
FWCI
11.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Genitourinary Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 CA999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Keywords
prostate-specific membrane antigen, CD3 bispecific antibody, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, T cell redirection, cytokine release syndrome, infusion reactions, subcutaneous dosing, anti-drug antibodies, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, dose-limiting toxicity, pharmacokinetics
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Male, Treatment Outcome, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Tumor Microenvironment, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review