The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gait retraining to reduce lower extremity loading in runners
Open accessAbstract
Background tibial stress fractures, which are among the most common running related injuries, have been associated with increased lower extremity loading (i.e., peak positive acceleration of the tibia, vertical force impact peak, and average and instantaneous vertical force loading rates) during initial contact. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of a gait retraining program designed to reduce this loading during running and to assess the short-term persistence of these reductions.Methods ten runners (six females and four males) with peak positive tibial acceleration greater than 8g, measured in an initial screening, participated in the retraining program. During the retraining sessions, subjects ran on a treadmill and received real-time visual feedback from an accelerometer attached to their distal tibias. Tibial acceleration and vertical ground reaction force data were collected from subjects during overground data collection sessions held pre-training, post-training, and at a 1-month follow-up.Findings peak positive acceleration of the tibia, vertical force impact peak, and average and instantaneous vertical force loading rates were all reduced immediately following the gait retraining. The decrease in tibial acceleration was nearly 50%. The reductions in vertical force loading rates and vertical force impact peak were approximately 30% and 20%, respectively. These reductions were maintained at the 1-month follow-up.Interpretation subjects were able to run with reduced tibial acceleration and vertical force loading immediately following completion of the gait retraining program and at the 1-month follow-up evaluation. This may reduce their risk of stress fractures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This mode of control engages automatic and implicit motor strategies that operate more efficiently and effectively than deliberate, explicitly conscious control of movement28–37, which yields fast, robust learning, leading to high retention and transfer38–43.”
From Injury Risk Factors Integrated Into Self-Guided Real-Time Biofeedback Improves High-Risk Biomechanics (2019) · cites this paper as [33]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“No-feedback trials are needed to develop a persistent internal movement representation, which can be recalled in retention tests when augmented feedback is withdrawn (Crowell & Davis, 2011;Kovacs & Shea, 2011;Winstein, 1991).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Crowell & Davis, 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Fading feedback-that is, reduced feedback frequency over time-has been shown to be effective (Crowell & Davis, 2011;Kovacs & Shea, 2011).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Crowell & Davis, 2011
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Reduced feedback frequency-that is, fading feedbackseems beneficial for both terminal feedback and concurrent feedback, as was shown in studies on training running technique (Crowell & Davis, 2011) and interlimb out-ofphase coordination (Kovacs & Shea, 2011).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Crowell & Davis, 2011
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Accelerationtime plots taught runners how to reduce excessive impact forces (Crowell & Davis, 2011).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Crowell & Davis, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,600
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,415
A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries
Taunton, J. E., Ryan, M., Clement, D. B., McKenzie, D. C., Lloyd-Smith, D. R., & Zumbo, B. D. (2002) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsm.36.2.95 · Cited by 1,660
Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal.
Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355 · Cited by 1,438
Distinct contribution of the cortico-striatal and cortico-cerebellar systems to motor skill learning
Doyon, J., Penhune, V. B., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00158-6 · Cited by 885
Biomechanical Factors Associated with Tibial Stress Fracture in Female Runners
Milner, C. E., Ferber, R., Pollard, C. D., Hamill, J., & Davis, I. S. (2006) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000183477.75808.92 · Cited by 838
Self-citationLearning and memory : a comprehensive reference
Byrne, J. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-1-03733-2 · Cited by 779
Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning.
Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.677 · Cited by 708
Korman, M., Raz, N., Flash, T., & Karni, A. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2035019100 · Cited by 378
Knowledge of Results and Motor Learning—Implications for Physical Therapy
Winstein, C. J. (1991) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/71.2.140 · Cited by 372
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review
Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8 · Cited by 1,416
Shull, P. B., Jirattigalachote, W., Hunt, M. A., Cutkosky, M. R., & Delp, S. L. (2014) · Gait & Posture · doi:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.189 · Cited by 384
Moore, I. S. (2016) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0474-4 · Cited by 382
van der Worp, H., Vrielink, J. W., & Bredeweg, S. W. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-094924 · Cited by 259
Management and Prevention of Bone Stress Injuries in Long-Distance Runners
Warden, S. J., Davis, I. S., & Fredericson, M. (2014) · Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy · doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.5334 · Cited by 277
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Crowell, H. P., & Davis, I. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Delaware (US)
- Corresponding author
- Crowell, Harrison Philip
- Venue
- Clinical Biomechanics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-83
- ISSN
- 0268-0033 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3014399
- OpenAlex
- W2129442430
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1s10rr022396-01)
- National Center for Research Resources (S10 RR-022396, 1S10 RR022396)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD050679)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
- Keywords
- gait retraining, tibial stress fracture, running injuries, lower limb loading, tibial acceleration, vertical ground reaction force, real-time visual feedback, accelerometer, treadmill running, overground running, injury prevention
- MeSH terms
- Acceleration, Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Gait, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Running, Stress, Mechanical, Tibia, Tibial Fractures, Time Factors, Fractures, Stress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
