Cited by 26Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Revolutionizing teledermatology: exploring the integration of artificial intelligence, including Generative Pre-trained Transformer chatbots for artificial intelligence-driven anamnesis, diagnosis, and treatment plans

Shapiro, Jonathan, Lyakhovitsky, Anna·2024·Clinics in Dermatology

Abstract

The integration of teledermatology and artificial intelligence (AI) marks a significant advancement in dermatologic care. This study examines the synergistic interplay between these two domains, highlighting their collective impact on enhancing the accuracy, accessibility, and efficiency of teledermatologic services. Teledermatology expands dermatologic care to remote and underserved areas, and AI technologies show considerable potential in analyzing dermatologic images and performing various tasks involved in teledermatology consultations. Such integration facilitates rapid, precise diagnoses, personalized treatment plans, and data-driven insights. Our explorative study involved designing a GPT-based chatbot named "Dr. DermBot" and exploring its performance in a teledermatologic consultation process. The design phase focused on the chatbot's ability to conduct consultations autonomously. The subsequent testing phase assessed its performance against the backdrop of current teledermatologic practices, exploring the potential of AI and chatbots to simulate and potentially enhance teledermatologic health care. Our study demonstrates the promising future of combining teledermatology with AI. It also brings to light ethical and legal concerns, including the protection of patient data privacy and adherence to regulatory standards. The union of teledermatology and AI not only aims to enhance the precision of teledermatologic diagnoses but also broadens the accessibility of dermatolo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2024.06.020

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shapiro, J., & Lyakhovitsky, A.
Affiliations
  • Maccabi Healthcare Services (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
Shapiro, Jonathan
Venue
Clinics in Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
492-497
ISSN
0738-081X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400096012
Cited by
26
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinics in Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
teledermatology, artificial intelligence, GPT chatbots, remote diagnosis, treatment planning, medical history, underserved populations, patient data privacy
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Dermatology, Humans, Skin Diseases, Telemedicine, Remote Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review