The DOI matches its Crossref record; 111 of the 114 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current methods and new directions in resting state fMRI
Open accessAbstract
Resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (rsfcMRI) has become a key component of investigations of neurocognitive and psychiatric behaviors. Over the past two decades, several methods and paradigms have been adopted to utilize and interpret data from resting-state fluctuations in the brain. These findings have increased our understanding of changes in many disease states. As the amount of resting state data available for research increases with big datasets and data-sharing projects, it is important to review the established traditional analysis methods and recognize areas where research methodology can be adapted to better accommodate the scale and complexity of rsfcMRI analysis. In this paper, we review established methods of analysis as well as areas that have been receiving increasing attention such as dynamic rsfcMRI, independent vector analysis, multiband rsfcMRI and network of networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“both immediate and distant changes in synaptic density and synaptic fidelity can impact fMRI measurments reliant on the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal and arterial spin labeling”
From Challenges and rewards of in vivo synaptic density imaging, and its application to the study of depression (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190
Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2575 · Cited by 11,820
Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations
Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 · Cited by 11,522
Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri
Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 · Cited by 9,812
Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control
Seeley, W. W., Menon, V., Schatzberg, A. F., Keller, J., Glover, G. H., Kenna, H., Reiss, A. L., & Greicius, M. D. (2007) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5587-06.2007 · Cited by 7,426
Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Fox, M. D., & Raichle, M. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2201 · Cited by 6,700
The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: An overview
Van Essen, D. C., Smith, S. M., Barch, D. M., Behrens, T. E. J., Yacoub, E., & Ugurbil, K. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.041 · Cited by 5,651
Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis
Beckmann, C. F., DeLuca, M., Devlin, J. T., & Smith, S. M. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1634 · Cited by 3,398
Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity
van den Heuvel, M. P., & Hulshoff Pol, H. E. (2010) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2010.03.008 · Cited by 3,326
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–110 of 110
Neuroimaging techniques in the study of type 2 diabetes
Rai, M. K. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-32848-0.00019-4
Tringale, K. R., Jenabi, M., Kohli, J. S., Jackson, C. B., Hattangadi-Gluth, J. A., McDonald, C., Fahy, T., Ramjan, S., Sands, S. A., Holodny, A. I., et al. (2026) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noag072
Self-citationJiang, Y., Zhao, L., Zhang, Y. P., Yang, Y., Wang, N., & Liu, X. (2026) · Journal of Integrative Neuroscience · doi:10.31083/jin49400
Xu, L., Tang, L., 征安吉, Li, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2026.1866063
Zhang, C., Zhang, W., Bai, J., Deng, X., Zhao, J., Cui, J., Ji, J., Li, T., Wang, Y., Li, K. E., et al. (2026) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-026-08332-2
Resting fMRI functional connectivity reflects fluctuations in inhibitory interneuron activityPreprint
Zaldivar, D., Ives, L., Koyano, K., Bhik‐Ghanie, R., Russ, B., Ye, F., & Leopold, D. A. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.25.734567
Xu, H., Xing, Y., & Guo, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Bioinformatics · doi:10.3389/fbinf.2026.1902380
Li, Y., Li, H., Peng, S., Chen, X., Yang, C., Tu, Y., Fan, Y., & Liu, N. (2026) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2026.117348
Neural Alterations in Chronic Pain: MRI AnalysisPreprint
Cohen-Blum, L., Eizman, S., Tétreault, P., & Duek, O. A. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.08.05.26359702
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, J., Gohel, S., & Vachha, B.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vachha, Behroze
- Venue
- Clinical Imaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-09
- Volume
- 65
- Pages
- 47-53
- ISSN
- 0899-7071 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7365764
- OpenAlex
- W3015866295
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Imaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- resting-state fMRI, functional connectivity, dynamic functional connectivity, independent vector analysis, network of networks, brain network analysis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Rest
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
