Cognitive tasks augment gamma EEG power
Abstract
Objective Gamma EEG oscillations are low amplitude rhythms in the 30-100 Hz range that correlate with cognitive task execution. They are usually reported using time-locked averaging of EEG during repetitive tasks. We tested the hypothesis that continuous gamma EEG would be measurable during mental tasks. Methods We investigated sustained human gamma EEG oscillations induced by 8 cognitive tasks (Visual Checkerboard, Expectancy, Reading, Subtraction, Music, Expectancy, Word learning, Word recall, and a Video Segment) in 20 subjects using standard digital EEG recording and power spectral analysis. Results All of the cognitive tasks augmented gamma power relative to a control condition (eyes open watching a blank computer screen). This enhancement was statistically significant at more than one scalp site for all tasks except checkerboard. The Expectancy, Learning, Reading and Subtraction tasks expressed the most impressive gamma response, up to 5 fold above the control condition and there was some task-related specificity of the distribution of increased gamma power, especially in posterior cortex with visual tasks. Conclusions Widespread gamma activation of cortical EEG can easily be demonstrated during mental activity. Significance These results establish the feasibility of measuring high frequency EEG rhythms with trans-cranial recordings, demonstrate that sustained gamma EEG activity correlates with mentation, and provides evidence consistent with the temporal binding model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A plausible reason for the discrepancy is that breath counting was an active task that required the participants' full attention, which was related to gamma activity.
“As we mentioned in the spectral power discussion, a plausible reason was that breath counting was an active task that required the participants' full attention, which was related to gamma activity (Fitzgibbon et al., 2004).”
From Frontal Electroencephalography Asymmetry and Desynchronized Functional Connectivity Associated with Long-Term and Short-Term Breathing Training (2026) · cites this paper as Fitzgibbon et al., 2004
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 33 · Cited by 228
- Authors
- Fitzgibbon, S. P., Pope, K. J., Mackenzie, L., Clark, C. R., & Willoughby, J. O.
- Affiliations
- Flinders University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Willoughby, J.O
- Venue
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1802-1809
- ISSN
- 1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047850237
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- National Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- gamma oscillations, cognitive tasks, high-frequency EEG, mental activity, expectancy, reading, word learning, word recall, posterior cortex
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reading, Mental Recall, Statistics, Nonparametric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review