Cited by 52Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesMotor Control and AdaptationNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Surround inhibition is modulated by task difficulty

Open access
Beck, S., Hallett, M.·2010·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to further characterize surround inhibition (SI) in the primary motor cortex (M1) by comparing its magnitude and time course during a simple reaction time task (SRT) and a choice reaction time task (CRT). Methods In both the SRT and the CRT, subjects performed the same right index finger flexion in response to an acoustic signal. For CRT, the alternative choice was a similar movement using the left index finger, as distinguished by a different tone. In both tasks, single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied at rest, 75ms (T1) and 25ms before EMG onset (T2), and during the first peak of EMG (T3) in the right first dorsal interosseous muscle (FDI). Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from both FDIs, which act as synergists in the task, and the right surrounding, relaxed abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB). Results For right hand movement, SI started earlier and was more pronounced for CRT compared to SRT. For left hand movement in the CRT, SI was similar to that of right hand movement. Conclusions We conclude that SI occurs earlier and stronger with increasing task difficulty. Significance The timing as well as the bilateral effect of the inhibition suggests that motor areas involved in motor planning, proximate to the motor cortex, contribute to the genesis of surround inhibition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.09.010

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attention and task difficulty are known non-specific modulators of corticospinal excitability and plasticity.

    “Indeed, non-specific factors such as attention and task difficulty are known to modulate corticospinal excitability and plasticity (Beck and Hallett, 2010; Conte et al., 2007; Pearce and Kidgell, 2009; Stefan et al., 2004).”

    From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as Beck and Hallett, 2010

    The Results (Movement of the right hand, SRT versus CRT; page unavailable) show that the more demanding choice task produced greater surround inhibition, measured with motor-evoked potentials. The Discussion (Mechanism of SI; page unavailable) says attention may explain that difference and reports evidence that attention influences rTMS-induced MEP facilitation. It does not establish that both attention and task difficulty are known modulators of corticospinal plasticity in general. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Angelucci A Levitt JB Lund JS 2002 Anatomical origins of the classical receptive field and modulatory surround field of single neurons in macaque visual cortical area V1 Prog Brain Res 136 373 388 12143395
  2. Aron AR Robbins TW Poldrack RA Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex Trends Cogn Sci 2004 8 4 170 7 15050513
  3. Beck S Richardson SP Shamim EA Dang N Schubert M Hallett M 2008 Short intracortical and surround inhibition are selectively reduced during movement initiation in focal hand dystonia J Neurosci 28 10363 10369 18842895 PMC4757491
  4. Beck S Shamim EA Richardson SP Schubert M Hallett M Inter-hemispheric inhibition is impaired in mirror dystonia Eur J Neurosci 2009 Apr 29 8 1634 40 19419426 PMC2770695
  5. Beck S Houdayer E Richardson SP Hallett M The role of inhibition from the left dorsal premotor cortex in right-sided focal hand dystonia Brain Stimulation Uncorrected Proof 04 May 2009 PMC3787900 20633420
  6. Brass M von Cramon DY The role of the frontal cortex in task preparation Cereb Cortex 2002 Sep 12 9 908 14 12183390
  7. Chen R 2004 Interactions between inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex Exp Brain Res 154 1 10 14579004
  8. Civardi C Cantello R Asselman P Rothwell JC 2001 Transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used to test connections to primary motor areas from frontal and medial cortex in humans Neuroimage 14 1444 1453 11707100
  9. Conover WJ Iman RL 1982 Analysis of covariance using the rank transformation Biometrics 38 715 724 7171697
  10. Daskalakis ZJ Christensen BK Fitzgerald PB Roshan L Chen R 2002 The mechanisms of interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortex J Physiol 543 317 326 12181302 PMC2290496
  11. Day BL Rothwell JC Thompson PD Maertens DN Nakashima K Shannon K Marsden CD 1989 Delay in the execution of voluntary movement by electrical or magnetic brain stimulation in intact man. Evidence for the storage of motor programs in the brain Brain 112 Pt 3 649 663 2731025
  12. Di Lazzaro V Restuccia D Oliviero A Profice P Ferrara L Insola A Mazzone P Tonali P Rothwell JC 1998 Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits Exp Brain Res 119 265 268 9535577
  13. Evarts EV 1966 Pyramidal tract activity associated with a conditioned hand movement in the monkey J Neurophysiol 29 1011 1027 4961643
  14. Ferbert A Priori A Rothwell JC Day BL Colebatch JG Marsden CD 1992 Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex J Physiol 453 525 546 1464843 PMC1175572
  15. Fetz EE Finocchio DV 1972 Operant conditioning of isolated activity in specific muscles and precentral cells Brain Res 40 19 23 4624487
  16. Hallett M 2004 Dystonia: abnormal movements result from loss of inhibition Adv Neurol 94 1 9 14509648
  17. Hoshiyama M Kitamura Y Koyama S Watanabe S Shimojo M Kakigi R 1996 Reciprocal change of motor evoked potentials preceding voluntary movement in humans Muscle Nerve 19 125 131 8559159
  18. Koch G Schneider S Baümer T Franca M Münchau A Cheeran B Fernandez Del Olmo M Cordivari C Rounis E Caltagirone C Bhatia K Rothwell JC 2008 Altered Dorsal Premotor–Motor Interhemispheric Pathway Activity in Focal Arm Dystonia Movement Disorders 23 5 2008 660 668 18175342
  19. Kujirai T Caramia MD Rothwell JC Day BL Thompson PD Ferbert A Wroe S Asselman P Marsden CD 1993 Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex J Physiol 471 501 519 8120818 PMC1143973
  20. Leocani L Cohen LG Wassermann EM Ikoma K Hallett M 2000 Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms Brain 123 Pt 6 1161 1173 10825355
  21. Liepert J Classen J Cohen LG Hallett M 1998 Task-dependent changes of intracortical inhibition Exp Brain Res 118 421 426 9497149
  22. Oldfield RC 1971 The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory Neuropsychologia 9 97 113 5146491
  23. Pascual-Leone A Brasil-Neto JP Valls-Sole J Cohen LG Hallett M 1992 Simple reaction time to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Comparison with reaction time to acoustic, visual and somatosensory stimuli Brain 115 Pt 1 109 122 1559148
  24. Perez MA Cohen LG 2008 Mechanisms underlying functional changes in the primary motor cortex ipsilateral to an active hand J Neurosci 28 5631 5640 18509024 PMC2440822
  25. Rossini PM Zarola F Stalberg E Caramia M 1988 Pre-movement facilitation of motor-evoked potentials in man during transcranial stimulation of the central motor pathways Brain Res 458 20 30 3208099
  26. Rushworth MF Johansen-Berg H Gobel SM Devlin JT The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection Neuroimage 2003 20 Suppl 1 S89 100 14597301
  27. Schluter ND Krams M Rushworth MF Passingham RE Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: the selection of actions Neuropsychologia 2001 39 105 113 11163368
  28. Schluter ND Rushworth MF Passingham RE Mills KR 1998 Temporary interference in human lateral premotor cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation Brain 121 Pt 5 785 799 9619185
  29. Sohn YH Hallett M 2004a Disturbed surround inhibition in focal hand dystonia Ann Neurol 56 595 599 15455393
  30. Sohn YH Hallett M 2004b Surround inhibition in human motor system Exp Brain Res 158 397 404 15146307
  31. Sohn YH Jung HY Kaelin-Lang A Hallett M 2003 Excitability of the ipsilateral motor cortex during phasic voluntary hand movement Exp Brain Res 148 176 185 12520405
  32. Sohn YH Wiltz K Hallett M 2002 Effect of volitional inhibition on cortical inhibitory mechanisms J Neurophysiol 88 333 338 12091558
  33. Stinear CM Byblow WD 2004 Impaired modulation of intracortical inhibition in focal hand dystonia Cereb Cortex 14 555 561 15054071
  34. Taylor PC Nobre AC Rushworth MF Subsecond changes in top down control exerted by human medial frontal cortex during conflict and action selection: a combined transcranial magnetic stimulation electroencephalography study J Neurosci 2007 Oct 17 27 42 11343 53 17942729 PMC6673042
  35. Tomberg C 1995 Differential voluntary programming of fingers extensor commands revealed by non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain Neurosci Lett 185 41 43 7731550
  36. Tomberg C Caramia MD 1991 Prime mover muscle in finger lift or finger flexion reaction times: identification with transcranial magnetic stimulation Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 81 319 322 1714827

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beck, S., & Hallett, M.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Hallett, M.
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
121
Issue
1
Pages
98-103
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968790992
Cited by
52
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (Z01NS002669, ZIANS002669)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
surround inhibition, primary motor cortex, task difficulty, choice reaction time task, motor evoked potentials, first dorsal interosseous muscle, abductor pollicis brevis, motor planning, intermanual transfer
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Aged, Choice Behavior, Electromyography, Female, Fingers, Humans, Functional Laterality, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Motor Skills, Muscle Contraction, Reaction Time, Reflex, Acoustic, Task Performance and Analysis, Muscle, Skeletal, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review