Cited by 383Muscle activation and electromyography studiesPeripheral Nerve DisordersMuscle Physiology and Disorders

Decoding the neural drive to muscles from the surface electromyogram

Open access
Farina, Dario, Holobar, Aleš, Merletti, Roberto, Enoka, Roger M.·2010·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

This brief review discusses the methods used to estimate the neural drive to muscles from the surface electromyogram (EMG). Surface EMG has been classically used to infer the neural activation of muscle by associating its amplitude with the number of action potentials discharged by a population of motor neurons. Although this approach is valuable in some applications, the amplitude of the surface EMG is only a crude indicator of the neural drive to muscle. More advanced methods are now available to estimate the neural drive to muscle from the surface EMG. These approaches identify the discharge times of a few motor units by decomposing the EMG signal to determine the relative changes in neural activation. This approach is reliable in several conditions and muscles for isometric contractions of moderate force, but is limited to the few superficial units that can be identified in the recordings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.040

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farina, D., Holobar, A., Merletti, R., & Enoka, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Aalborg University (DK)
  • Politecnico di Torino (IT)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Farina, Dario
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
121
Issue
10
Pages
1616-1623
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043240362
Cited by
383
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondazione CRT
  • Compagnia di San Paolo
  • Aalborg Universitet
  • National Institute on Aging (AG009000, R01AG009000)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Peripheral Nerve Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
Keywords
surface electromyography, neural drive, motor unit discharge, EMG decomposition, motor unit identification, isometric contraction
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Electric Stimulation, Electromyography, Humans, Muscle Contraction, Muscles, Nervous System Physiological Phenomena, Numerical Analysis, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review