Online use of error-related potentials in healthy users and people with severe motor impairment increases performance of a P300-BCI
Abstract
Objective To investigate whether error-related potentials can be used to increase information transfer rate of a P3 brain-computer interface (BCI) in healthy and motor-impaired individuals. Methods Extraction and classification of the error-related potential was performed offline on data recorded from six amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. An online study with 17 healthy and six motor impaired participants followed, using a modified P3 speller to provide explicit feedback of spelled letters. On recognition of error-related potentials, the interface informed users that the incorrect letter was automatically deleted. Results The offline cross-validation estimate of P3 speller data of six ALS patients increased bit rate by 0.44 bit/trial. During online copy spelling, the participants increased their bit rate by 0.52 bit/trial with the error correction system (ECS). Some participants performed free spelling and were able to increase their bit rate. Finally, we demonstrated that healthy participants could increase their bit rate by using a classifier pre-trained on other users' data. Conclusions Error-related potentials as a secondary source of information can be used to increase overall bit rate in a P3 BCI. Significance The method should be made available to any patient using the P3 BCI for communication.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Cedarbaum, J. M., Stambler, N., Malta, E., Fuller, C., Hilt, D., Thurmond, B., & Nakanishi, A. (1999) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00210-5 · Cited by 3,307 · see citing works
A P300-based brain–computer interface for people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Nijboer, F., Sellers, E. W., Mellinger, J., Jordan, M. A., Matuz, T., Furdea, A., Halder, S., Mochty, U., Krusienski, D. J., Vaughan, T. M., et al. (2008) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.03.034 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
Self-citationKübler, A., & Birbaumer, N. (2008) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.06.019 · Cited by 441 · see citing works
Self-citationBCI demographics: how many (and what kinds of) people can use an SSVEP BCI?
Allison, B., Luth, T., Valbuena, D., Teymourian, A., Volosyak, I., & Graser, A. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2009.2039495 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Nijboer (2010) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2010.00055 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces
Lawhern, V. J., Solon, A. J., Waytowich, N. R., Gordon, S. M., Hung, C. P., & Lance, B. J. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aace8c · Cited by 5,115 · see citing works
Teaching brain-machine interfaces as an alternative paradigm to neuroprosthetics control
Iturrate, I., Chavarriaga, R., Montesano, L., Minguez, J., & Millán, J. D. R. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep13893 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
McCane, L. M., Heckman, S. M., McFarland, D. J., Townsend, G., Mak, J. N., Sellers, E. W., Zeitlin, D., Tenteromano, L. M., Wolpaw, J. R., & Vaughan, T. M. (2015) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.01.013 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
A Generic Transferable EEG Decoder for Online Detection of Error Potential in Target Selection
Bhattacharyya, S., Konar, A., Tibarewala, D. N., & Hayashibe, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00226 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“Spüler et al. (2012) performed an online study on ErrP detection from 17 normal and 6 motor impaired participants.”
Background
- Authors
- Spüler, M., Bensch, M., Kleih, S., Rosenstiel, W., Bogdan, M., & Kübler, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Spüler, Martin
- Venue
- Clinical Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1328-1337
- ISSN
- 1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141840333
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- error-related potentials, information transfer rate, motor impairment, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, error correction, online feedback
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Brain Mapping, Communication Devices for People with Disabilities, Electrodes, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Online Systems, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Case-Control Studies, Event-Related Potentials, P300, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Motor Skills Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review