Cited by 149EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesMuscle activation and electromyography studiesMotor Control and Adaptation

Teaching brain-machine interfaces as an alternative paradigm to neuroprosthetics control

Open access
Iturrate, Iñaki, Chavarriaga, Ricardo, Montesano, Luis, Minguez, Javier, Millán, José del R.·2015·Scientific Reports

Abstract

Brain-machine interfaces (BMI) usually decode movement parameters from cortical activity to control neuroprostheses. This requires subjects to learn to modulate their brain activity to convey all necessary information, thus imposing natural limits on the complexity of tasks that can be performed. Here we demonstrate an alternative and complementary BMI paradigm that overcomes that limitation by decoding cognitive brain signals associated with monitoring processes relevant for achieving goals. In our approach the neuroprosthesis executes actions that the subject evaluates as erroneous or correct, and exploits the brain correlates of this assessment to learn suitable motor behaviours. Results show that, after a short user's training period, this teaching BMI paradigm operated three different neuroprostheses and generalized across several targets. Our results further support that these error-related signals reflect a task-independent monitoring mechanism in the brain, making this teaching paradigm scalable. We anticipate this BMI approach to become a key component of any neuroprosthesis that mimics natural motor control as it enables continuous adaptation in the absence of explicit information about goals. Furthermore, our paradigm can seamlessly incorporate other cognitive signals and conventional neuroprosthetic approaches, invasive or non-invasive, to enlarge the range and complexity of tasks that can be accomplished.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/srep13893

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because of reinforcement learning, the BMI system can potentially store single to several control policies, allowing patient personalization.

    “Because of this “reinforcement learning,” the system can potentially store single to several control “policies,” which allow for patient personalization [48].”
  • Recent advances in brain machine interfaces have shown that a system can store and learn a subject's intended voluntary goal-directed wishes (EEG) when the user trains an intelligent controller.

    “The recent advances in brain machine interfaces (BMIs) have shown that a system can be employed where the subjects’ intended and voluntary goal-directed wishes (electroencephalogram, EEG) can be stored and learned when a user “trains” an intelligent controller (an AI).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Iturrate I., Montesano L., Chavarriaga R., Millán J. d. R. & Minguez J. Spatiotemporal filtering for EEG error related potentials. Proc. 5th Int Brain-Computer Interface Conf., Graz (Austria), 12– 15. Graz: Graz: Verlag der TU Graz (2011, September).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iturrate, I., Chavarriaga, R., Montesano, L., Minguez, J., & Millán, J. D. R.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Millán, José del R.
Venue
Scientific Reports
Published
2015-09-10
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
13893-13893
ISSN
2045-2322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109065101
Cited by
149
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scientific Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Zaguan (University of Zaragoza Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
brain-computer interface, neural prostheses, cognitive monitoring, motor learning, adaptive control
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Movement, Psychomotor Performance, Young Adult, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review