Cited by 1Face Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ID 28 – Approach–attitude and rTMs on left DLPFC affect emotional face recognition and facial feedback (EMG)

Balconi, M., Canavesio, Y., Campanella, S.·2016·Clinical Neurophysiology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.11.263

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Balconi, M., Canavesio, Y., & Campanella, S.
Affiliations
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
127
Issue
3
Pages
e79
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346125085
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
facial emotion recognition, affective attitudes, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, facial feedback, corrugator supercilii, happiness, anger, fear, laterality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review